Functioning Well in a Dysfunctional System: Recommendations for Clinical Psychologists in Workers’ Compensation Settings
- 113 Downloads
Clinical psychologists working in workers’ compensation (WC) settings face unique and complex professional and ethical challenges. The present paper provides recommendations to clinical psychologists for avoiding the largely unintentional harm to clients and unethical practices that can occur within the realm of WC. Although the psychologists working in WC settings more often than not act in ethical ways grounded in years of academic and professional training, the unique tasks required of psychologists in WC settings (e.g., rating injuries; determinations of causality) and the pressures inherent in the system can potentially lead even the most well-intentioned mental health professionals into unsavory ethical and professional scenarios. The authors examine the (un)witting contributions of psychologists to the current dysfunction in the WC system and provide recommendations for traversing the oft-serpentine terrain of mental health evaluations and treatment in WC settings. Specifically, the authors discuss, among the many possible potential pitfalls, (1) bringing personal bias into the evaluative setting, (2) engaging in unsavory advertising practices, (3) cherry-picking and other missteps in record review, (4) engaging in cursory consenting, (5) failure to engage in evidence-based assessment and report writing, and (6) role challenges.
KeywordsWorkers’ compensation Psychological injury Ethics QME
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional). No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- American Medical Association. (2005). Standards for independent medical examinations. Available at: http://www.aimehi.com/PDFs/IME%20standards%20for%20AIMEHI%20web%20site.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2016.
- American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8, § 153Google Scholar
- Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8, § 35Google Scholar
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar
- First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J.B.W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition with psychotic screen (SCID-I/ PW/PSY SCREEN). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
- Fisher, C. B. (2003). Decoding the ethics code. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C., 293 F. 1013 (1923).Google Scholar
- Gold, L. H., Anfang, S. A., Drukteinis, A. M., Metzner, J. L., Price, M., Wall, B. W., & Zonana, H. V. (2008). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic evaluation of psychiatric disability. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 36, S3–S50.Google Scholar
- Green, A. R., Carney, D. R., Pallin, D. J., Ngo, L. H., Raymond, K. L., Iezzoni, L. I., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1231–1238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Groth-Marnat, G. (2009). Introduction. In Handbook of psychological assessment (5th ed., pp. 9–23). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gutheil, T. G., & Bursztajn, H. (2003). Avoiding ipse dixit mislabeling: Post-Daubert approaches to expert clinical opinions. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 31, 205–210.Google Scholar
- Jordan, J. (2016). The battle over reliable expert testimony: Florida courts may stop using Daubert, but not in workers’ compensation. LexisNexis Legal Newsroom Workers’ Compensation Law, [Web post]. Retrieved June 07, 2016, from https://www.lexisnexis.com/legalnewsroom/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/archive/2016/02/02/the-battle-over-reliable-expert-testimony-florida-courts-may-stop-using-daubert-but-not-in-workers-compensation.aspx
- Kirsch, I., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstat, A. (1993). Adult Literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the national adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Kubany, E. S., Leisen, M. B., Kaplan, A. S., Watson, S. B., Haynes, S. N., Owens, J. A., & Burns, K. (2000). Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of trauma exposure: The traumatic life events questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 12, 210–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto, A. (1994). Reforming the reform: Mental stress claims under California’s workers’ compensation system. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 27, 1327–1366.Google Scholar
- Schatman, M. E. (2012). Workers’ compensation and its potential for perpetuation of disability. In Handbook of occupational health and wellness (pp. 341–361). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N., & Scheuring, B. (1992). Selbstberichtete Verhaltens-und Symptomhäufigkeiten: Was Befragte aus Antwortvorgaben des Fragebogens lernen. Frequency reports of psychosomatic symptoms: What respondents learn from response alternatives. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 22, 197–208.Google Scholar
- Shuman, D. W. (1997). What should we permit mental health professionals to say about “the best interests of the child”?: An essay on common sense, “Daubert”, and the rules of evidence. Family Law Quarterly, 31, 551–569.Google Scholar
- Stallworth v. Shuler, 777 F.2d 1431 (11th Cir. 1985).Google Scholar
- Underwager, R., & Wakefield, H. (1995). Psychological evaluations you need at trial: What they can and cannot do. Institute for Psychological Therapies, 7, 1–32.Google Scholar
- Wise, E. A. (2016). Psychological injuries, workers’ compensation insurance, and mental health policy issues. Psychological Injury and Law. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s12207-016-9274-2.