Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 297–316 | Cite as

Clinical and Forensic Standards for the Psychological Assessment of Patients with Chronic Pain

Article

Abstract

Pain is a subjective psychological experience that is experienced from time to time by virtually everyone. Despite pain’s subjective nature, litigation for pain and suffering has been recognized by the courts for centuries, and currently accounts for the majority of damages awarded in medical malpractice cases. Advances in technology notwithstanding, the experience of pain cannot be objectively assessed by medical imaging and must instead be assessed by psychological methods. Conducting a psychological assessment of a patient with chronic pain requires knowledge of the nature of pain and factors that might influence pain reports. Clinical and forensic examiners can benefit from knowledge of standards regarding which patients should be referred for psychological assessment, for who can perform psychological assessments, for determining which variables to assess, about psychological test selection, for test security, for interviewing the patient with chronic pain, for allowing third party observers, and for other matters. To this end, this article reviews relevant laws, case law, regulations, professional standards, clinical practice guidelines, professional practice guidelines, professional consensus statements pertaining to psychological testing and assessment methods, and presurgical psychological assessment methods. The conclusion addresses the application of these findings to the psychological assessment of patients with chronic pain.

Keywords

Chronic pain Forensic settings Psychological testing 

References

  1. Aguerrevere, L., Greve, K., & Bianchini, K. (2013). Multivariate cluster analysis of the MMPI-2-RF in pain patients with financial compensation: Characterization of subgroups based on demographics, medico-legal and predictive outcome variables. The Journal of Pain, 14, S22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., … Zanoli, G. (2006). Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. European Spine Journal, 15(Supplement 2), s192–s300.Google Scholar
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2001). Policy statement on the presence of third party observers in neuropsychological assessments. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. (2008). Chronic pain treatment guidelines (2nd ed.). Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press.Google Scholar
  6. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  7. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual on mental disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5 (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved on February 12, 2014, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf
  10. American Psychological Association. (2012). APA dictionary of clinical psychology [Kindle Edition] (pp. 64968–64974). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  11. American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Anciano, D. (1986). The Pain Behaviour Checklist: Factor analysis and validation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 301–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. APA Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. (1996). Statement on the disclosure of test data. American Psychologist, 51, 644–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. APA Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. (2007). Recent developments affecting the disclosure of test data and materials: Comments regarding the 1996 statement on the disclosure of test data. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/test-disclosure-statement.pdf
  15. Apkarian, A. V., Baliki, M. N., & Geha, P. Y. (2009). Towards a theory of chronic pain. Progress in Neurobiology, 87, 81–97.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Attix, D. K., Donders, J., Johnson-Greene, D., Grote, C. L., Harris, J. G., & Bauer, R. M. (2007). Disclosure of neuropsychological test data: Official position of division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association, Association of Postdoctoral Programs in Clinical Neuropsychology, and American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 232–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Avraham, R. (2006). Putting a price on pain-and-suffering damages: A critique of the current approaches and a preliminary proposal for change. Northwestern University Law Review, 100, 87–120.Google Scholar
  18. Axelrod, B., Heilbronner, R., Barth, J., Larrabee, G., Faust, D., Pliskin, N., … Planning and Policy Committee, National Academy of Neuropsychology. (2000). Test security: Official position statement of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 383–386.Google Scholar
  19. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2011). MMPI-2-RF, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bianchini, K. J., Curtis, K. L., & Greve, K. W. (2006). Compensation and malingering in traumatic brain injury: A dose-response relationship? Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 831–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Block, A. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Marek, R. J. (2013). Psychological risk factors for poor outcome of spine surgery and spinal cord stimulator implant: A review of the literature and their assessment with the MMPI-2-RF. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 81–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Block, A. R., Gatchel, R. J., Deardorff, W. W., & Guyer, R. D. (2003). The psychology of spine surgery. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Block, A. R., Kremer, E. F., & Gaylor, M. (1980). Behavioral treatment of chronic pain: The spouse as a discriminative cue for pain behavior. Pain, 9, 243–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Block, A. R., Ohnmeiss, D. D., Guyer, R. D., Rashbaum, R. F., & Hochschuler, S. H. (2001). The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine Journal, 1, 274–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Boomershine, C. S. (2012). A comprehensive evaluation of standardized assessment tools in the diagnosis of fibromyalgia and in the assessment of fibromyalgia severity. Pain Research and Treatment, 2012, Article ID 653714. doi:10.1155/2012/653714
  26. Borkosky, B. G. (2014). Who is the client and who controls release of records in a forensic evaluation? A review of ethics codes and practice guidelines. Psychological Injury and Law, 7, 264–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bovbjerg, R. R., Sloan, F. A., & Blumstein, J. F. (1988). Valuing life and limb in tort: Scheduling pain and suffering. Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 919–924.Google Scholar
  28. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2003). Battery for health improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  29. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2005). Chronic pain and biopsychosocial disorders. Practical Pain Management, 5, 52–61.Google Scholar
  30. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2009). Assessment of biopsychosocial risk factors for medical treatment: A collaborative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 16, 127–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2013). The psychological assessment of patients with chronic pain. In T. R. Deer (Ed.), Comprehensive treatment of chronic pain: Medical, interventional, and behavioral approaches (pp. 805–826). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Bruns, D., & Disorbio, J. M. (2014) The psychological evaluation of patients with chronic pain: A review of BHI 2 clinical and forensic interpretive considerations. Psychological Injury and Law, 7. doi:10.1007/s12207-014-9206-y
  33. Bruns, D., Mueller, K., & Warren, P. A. (2010). A review of evidence-based biopsychosocial laws governing the treatment of pain and injury. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Bruns, D., Mueller, K., & Warren, P. A. (2012). Biopsychosocial law, health care reform, and the control of medical inflation in Colorado. Rehabilitation Psychology, 57, 81–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Bruns, D., & Warren, P. A. (2011). The assessment of psychosocial contributions to disability. In P. A. Warren (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral health disability (pp. 73–104). New York: Springer-Verlag New York Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Buros Center for Testing. (2014). Buros Center for Testing. Retrieved on February 10, 2014, from http://buros.org
  37. Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory–2 (MMPI–2): Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  38. Butcher, J. N., Hamilton, C. K., Rouse, S. V., & Cumella, E. J. (2006). The deconstruction of the Hy Scale of MMPI-2: Failure of RC3 in measuring somatic symptom expression. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 186–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. California Division of Workers’ Compensation. (2009). Medical treatment utilization schedule. Retrieved on October 15, 2013, from http://www.dir.ca.gov/dwc/MTUS/MTUS_RegulationsGuidelines.html
  40. Canadian Psychological Association. (2009). Policy & position statements: The presence of involved third party observer in neuropsychological assessments. Retrieved on October 5, 2014, from http://www.cpa.ca/aboutcpa/policystatements/#Thirdparty
  41. Carragee, E. J., Alamin, T. F., Miller, J. L., & Carragee, J. M. (2005). Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: A prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain. Spine Journal, 5, 24–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Carragee, E. J., Barcohana, B., Alamin, T., & van den Haak, E. (2004). Prospective controlled study of the development of lower back pain in previously asymptomatic subjects undergoing experimental discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29, 1112–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Celestin, J., Edwards, R. R., & Jamison, R. N. (2009). Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: A systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Medicine, 10, 639–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2008). CMS Manual System: Pub 100-02 Medicare Benefit Policy - Transmittal 85. Psychological and Neuropsychological Tests. Retrieved from http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/downloads/R85BP.pdf
  45. Chafetz, M. (2011). Reducing the probability of false positives in malingering detection of social security disability claimants. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 1239–1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence of others on people’s reactions to norm violations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Chou, R., Loeser, J. D., Owens, D. K., Rosenquist, R. W., Atlas, S. J., Baisden, J., … American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guideline Panel. (2009). Interventional therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain: An evidence-based clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34, 1066–1077.Google Scholar
  48. Colorado Division of Worker Compensation. (2012). Psychological tests commonly used in the assessment of chronic pain. Retrieved from http://www.healthpsych.com/testing/psychtests.pdf
  49. Colorado Division of Workers’ Compensation. (2012). Rule 17, Exhibit 9: Chronic pain disorder medical treatment guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.coworkforce.com/dwc/Rules/Rules2007/New MTG/EX_9_Chronic_Pain.pdf
  50. Colorado Division of Workers’ Compensation. (2010). Rule 8: Authorized treating physician. Google Scholar
  51. Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment & American Psychological Association. (2007). Statement on third party observers in psychological testing and assessment: A framework for decision making. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/third-party-observers.pdf
  52. Constantinou, M., Ashendorf, L., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2002). When the third party observer of a neuropsychological evaluation is an audio-recorder. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 407–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Craig, K. D. (2009). The social communication model of pain. Canadian Psychology, 50, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).Google Scholar
  55. den Boer, J. J., Oostendorp, R. A., Beems, T., Munneke, M., Oerlemans, M., & Evers, A. W. (2006). A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery. European Spine Journal, 15, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Deyo, R. A., Battie, M., Beurskens, A. J., Bombardier, C., Croft, P., Koes, B., … Waddell, G. (1998). Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 23, 2003–2013.Google Scholar
  57. Dirks, J. F., Wunder, J., Kinsman, R., McElhinny, J., & Jones, N. F. (1993). A pain rating scale and a pain behavior checklist for clinical use: Development, norms, and the consistency score. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 59, 41–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Disorbio, J. M., & Bruns, D. (2002). Brief battery for health improvement 2 manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  59. Disorbio, J. M., Bruns, D, & Bruns, A. (2012a). The reliability of a standardized method for assessing Block’s criteria for psychosocial risk in patients being treated for pain and injury. American Academy of Pain Medicine’s 2012 Annual Meeting. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://www.painmed.org/2012posters/poster188.pdf
  60. Disorbio, J. M., Bruns, D, & Bruns, A. (2012b). Standardized norms for Block’s criteria for psychosocial risk in patients being treated for pain and injury. American Academy of Pain Medicine’s 2012 Annual Meeting. Retrieved June 10, 2012, from http://www.painmed.org/2012posters/poster187.pdf
  61. Dreyfuss, P., Dryer, S., Griffin, J., Hoffman, J., & Walsh, N. (1994). Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 19, 1138–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Eastvold, A. D., Belanger, H. G., & Vanderploeg, R. D. (2012). Does a third party observer affect neuropsychological test performance? It depends. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 520–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Eck, J. C., Sharan, A., Ghogawala, Z., Resnick, D. K., Watters, W. C., III, Mummaneni, P. V., … Kaiser, M. G. (2014). Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: Lumbar fusion for intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21, 42–47.Google Scholar
  64. Epker, J. (2013). Psychometric methods for measuring pain. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 30–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Epker, J., & Block, A. R. (2001). Presurgical psychological screening in back pain patients: A review. Clinical Journal of Pain, 17, 200–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Federal Bureau of Prisons. (2008). Forensic and other mental health evaluations. Retrieved on April 20, 2014, from http://www.bop.gov/PublicInfo/execute/policysearch?todo=query
  67. Federation of State Medical Boards. (2013). Model policy for the use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of chronic pain. Retrieved on February 8, 2014, from http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/pain_policy_july2013.pdf
  68. Fishbain, D. A., Cole, B., Cutler, R. B., Lewis, J., Rosomoff, H. L., & Rosomoff, R. S. (2003). A structured evidence-based review on the meaning of nonorganic physical signs: Waddell signs. Pain Medicine, 4, 141–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Fisher, M. A. (2009). Replacing “who is the client?” with a different ethical question. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Flor, H., Breitenstein, C., Birbaumer, N., & Furst, M. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of spouse solicitousness towards pain behaviors, spouse interaction, and pain perception. Behavior Therapy, 26, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Fordyce, W. E. (1988). Pain and suffering. A reappraisal. American Psychologist, 43, 276–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 34 ALR 145 (D. C. Cir. 1923).Google Scholar
  73. Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2014). Psychometrics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Gaskin, D. J., & Richard, P. (2012). The economic costs of pain in the United States. The Journal of Pain: Official Journal of the American Pain Society, 13, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Gatchel, R. J., Peng, Y. B., Fuchs, P. N., Peters, M. L., & Turk, D. C. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 581–624.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ghogawala, Z., Resnick, D. K., Watters, W. C. III, Mummaneni, P. V., Dailey, A. T., Choudhri, T. F., … Kaiser, M. G. (2014). Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21, 7–13.Google Scholar
  77. Greiffenstein, M., Gervais, R., Baker, W. J., Artiola, L., & Smith, H. (2013). Symptom validity testing in medically unexplained pain: A chronic regional pain syndrome type 1 case series. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 138–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Brewer, S. T. (2013). The assessment of performance and self-report validity in persons claiming pain-related disability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27, 108–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hanssen, M. M., Peters, M. L., Vlaeyen, J. W., Meevissen, Y. M., & Vancleef, L. M. (2013). Optimism lowers pain: Evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms. Pain, 154, 53–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Hill, G., & Hill, K. (2014a). Damages. The People’s Law Dictionary. Retrieved on October 3, 2014, from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=423
  81. Hill, G., & Hill, K. (2014b). General damages. The People’s Law Dictionary. Retrieved on April 12, 2014, from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1985
  82. Hill, G., & Hill, K. (2014c). Pain and suffering. The People’s Law Dictionary. Retrieved on April 12, 2014, from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1433
  83. Hill, G., & Hill, K. (2014d). Special damages. The People’s Law Dictionary. Retrieved on April 12, 2014, from http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1985
  84. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. (2013). Health care guideline: Assessment and management of chronic pain. Retrieved on October 3, 2014, from http://www.icsi.org/_asset/bw798b/ChronicPain.pdf
  85. Jensen, M. P. (2010). A neuropsychological model of pain: Research and clinical implications. Journal of Pain, 11, 2–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jensen, M. P., & Turk, D. C. (2014). Contributions of psychology to the understanding and treatment of people with chronic pain: Why it matters to ALL psychologists. American Psychologist, 69, 105–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kane, A. W. (2006). Psychology, causality and court. In G. Young, A. W. Kane, & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI (pp. 13–51). New York: SpringerSBM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kane, R. L., Bershadsky, B., Rockwood, T., Saleh, K., & Islam, N. C. (2005). Visual analog scale pain reporting was standardized. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 618–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2013). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, & issues (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  90. Karjalainen, K., Malmivaara, A., van Tulder, M., Roine, R., Jauhiainen, M., Hurri, H., & Koes, B. (2001). Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain in working-age adults: A systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 26, 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Kaufmann, P. M. (2009). Protecting raw data and psychological tests from wrongful disclosure: A primer on the law and other persuasive strategies. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1130–1159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kerns, R. D., Haythornthwaite, J., Rosenberg, R., Southwick, S., Giller, E. L., & Jacob, M. C. (1991). The Pain Behavior Check List (PBCL): Factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 155–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kohl, A., Rief, W., & Glombiewski, J. A. (2013). Acceptance, cognitive restructuring, and distraction as coping strategies for acute pain. Journal of Pain, 14, 305–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2008). Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: Standards and cases (3rd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Kreiner, D. S., Hwang, S. W., Easa, J. E., Resnick, D. K., Baisden, J. L., Bess, S., … North American Spine Society. (2014). An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The Spine Journal: Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 14, 180–191.Google Scholar
  96. Lousberg, R., Schmidt, A. J., & Groenman, N. H. (1992). The relationship between spouse solicitousness and pain behavior: Searching for more experimental evidence. Pain, 51, 75–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. (2004). Neuropsychological assessments in the presence of third parties: Ethical issues and literature review. NYS Psychologist (May/June).Google Scholar
  98. Main, C. J., & Waddell, G. (1987). Psychometric construction and validity of the Pilowsky Illness Behaviour Questionnaire in British patients with chronic low back pain. Pain, 28, 13–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. McCord, D. M., & Drerup, L. C. (2011). Relative practical utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 restructured clinical scales versus the clinical scales in a chronic pain patient sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33, 140–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McSweeny, A. J., Becker, B. C., Naugle, R., Snow, W., Binder, L. M., & Thompson, L. L. (1998). Ethical issues related to the presence of third party observers in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 552–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Melton, G. B. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  102. Melzack, R., & Katz, J. (2006). Pain in the 21st century: The neuromatirx and beyond. In G. Young, A. W. Kane, & K. Nicholson (Eds.), Psychological knowledge in court: PTSD, pain, and TBI (pp. 129–148). New York: SpringerSBM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Merskey, H., & Bogduk, N. (1994). Classification of chronic pain (2nd ed.). Seattle, WA: IASP Press.Google Scholar
  104. Meyer, L. J., Bruns, D., Disorbio, J. M., & Bruns, A. (2012a). Reliability of den Boer’s criteria. Pain Practice, 12(s1), 50.Google Scholar
  105. Meyer, L. J., Bruns, D., Disorbio, J. M., & Bruns, A. (2012b). Standardizing den Boer’s criteria for presurgical psychological assessment. Pain Practice, 12(s1), 134.Google Scholar
  106. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., … Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165.Google Scholar
  107. Millon, T., Antoni, M., Millon, C., Meagher, S., & Grossman, S. (2001). Millon behavioral medicine diagnostic manual. Minnealpolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  108. Millon, T., Antoni, M., Millon, C., Minor, S., & Grossman, S. (2010). Millon behavioral medicine diagnostic manual supplement: Pain patient reports. Minnealpolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  109. Millon, T., & Davis, R. D. (1996). Disorders of personality: DSM-IV and beyond (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  110. Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  111. Montana Utilization and Treatment Guidelines, ARM 24.29.1591 C.F.R. (2011).Google Scholar
  112. Morel, K. R. (2009). Test security in medicolegal cases: Proposed guidelines for attorneys utilizing neuropsychology practice. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 635–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality assessment inventory (PAI): Professional manual (2nd ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  114. Mummaneni, P. V., Dhall, S. S., Eck, J. C., Groff, M. W., Ghogawala, Z., Watters, W. C., III, … Kaiser, M. G. (2014). Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: Interbody techniques for lumbar fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21, 67–74.Google Scholar
  115. Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., & Velasquez, R. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet: New problems, old issues. American Psychologist, 59, 150–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Nuckols, T. K., Anderson, L., Popescu, I., Diamant, A. L., Doyle, B., Di Capua, P., & Chou, R. (2014). Opioid prescribing: A systematic review and critical appraisal of guidelines for chronic pain. Annals of Internal Medicine, 160, 38–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Pearson Assessments. (2014). HIPAA. Retrieved on February 12, 2014, from http://www.pearsonclinical.com/psychology/legal/HIPAAfaqs.html
  118. Phillips, L. J. (1977). The origins of treatment demands. The influence of third parties. Journal of the American College of Dentists, 44, 64–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Podmore, D., Chaney, D., & Golder, P. (1975). Third parties in the interview situation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Social Psychology, 95, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Robinson, M. E., Staud, R., & Price, D. D. (2013). Pain measurement and brain activity: Will neuroimages replace pain ratings? Journal of Pain, 14, 323–327.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rodgers, G. B. (1993). Estimating jury compensation for pain and suffering in product liability cases involving nonfatal personal injury. Journal of Forensic Economics, 6, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Rohling, M. L., Binder, L. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1995). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychology, 14, 537–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Romano, J. M., Turner, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Friedman, L. S., Bulcroft, R. A., Hops, H., & Wright, S. F. (1995). Chronic pain patient-spouse behavioral interactions predict patient disability. Pain, 63, 353–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: J.M. Sattler.Google Scholar
  125. The Joint Commission. (2011). The fifth ‘vital sign.’ Complying with pain mangement standard PC.01.02.07. The Source, 9(11).Google Scholar
  126. The Joint Commission. (2014). Facts about pain management. Retrieved on February 10, 2014, from http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/Pain_Management1.PDF
  127. Tollison, D., & Langley, J. C. (1995). Pain patient profile manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  128. Turk, D. C., Swanson, K. S., & Gatchel, R. J. (2008). Predicting opioid misuse by chronic pain patients: A systematic review and literature synthesis. Clinical Journal of Pain, 24, 497–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Turner, S. M., DeMers, S. T., Fox, H. R., & Reed, G. (2001). APA’s guidelines for test user qualifications: An executive summary. American Psychologist, 56, 1099–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Guidance on standards, assessments, and accountability. Retrieved on July 22, 2013, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/standardsassessment/index.html
  131. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2007). Guidance for industry and FDA staff—Recognition and use of consensus standards. Retrieved on February 8, 2014, from http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm077274.htm
  132. van der Putten, A., & Vlaskamp, C. (2011). Pain assessment in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A pilot study into the use of the Pain Behaviour Checklist in everyday practice. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1677–1684.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Vidmar, N., Gross, F., & Rose, M. (1998). Jury awards for medical malpractice and post-verdict adjustments of those awards. DePaul Law Review, 48, 265.Google Scholar
  134. Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229. (1976).Google Scholar
  135. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust, 487 U.S. 977. (1988).Google Scholar
  136. Wells, N., Paseo, C., & McCaffrey, M. (2008). Improving the quality of care through pain assessment and management. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/resources/nursing/resources/nurseshdbk/WellsN_SMTEP.pdf
  137. Wertli, M. M., Rasmussen-Barr, E., Held, U., Weiser, S., Bachmann, L. M., & Brunner, F. (2014). Fear-avoidance beliefs-a moderator of treatment efficacy in patients with low back pain: A systematic review. Spine Journal. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.033 Google Scholar
  138. Wessels, T., van Tulder, M., Sigl, T., Ewert, T., Limm, H., & Stucki, G. (2006). What predicts outcome in non-operative treatments of chronic low back pain? A systematic review. European Spine Journal, 15, 1633–1644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Williams, A. C. (2002). Facial expression of pain: An evolutionary account. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 439–455. discussion 455-488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Williamson, D., Robinson, M. E., & Melamed, B. (1997). Pain behavior, spouse responsiveness, and marital satisfaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Behavior Modification, 21, 97–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wilson, S. J., Martire, L. M., Keefe, F. J., Mogle, J. A., Stephens, M. A., & Schulz, R. (2013). Daily verbal and nonverbal expression of osteoarthritis pain and spouse responses. Pain, 154, 2045–2053.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wisniewski, S. R., Rush, A. J., Nierenberg, A. A., Gaynes, B. N., Warden, D., Luther, J. F., … Trivedi, M. H. (2009). Can phase III trial results of antidepressant medications be generalized to clinical practice? A STAR*D report. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 599–607.Google Scholar
  143. Work Loss Data Institute. (2009). Official disability guidelines. Encinitas, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  144. World Health Organization. (2014). International classification of diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Psychology AssociatesGreeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations