Advertisement

Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 4, Issue 3–4, pp 217–234 | Cite as

Military Service Records: Searching for the Truth

  • Robert G. Moering
Article

Abstract

In conducting Compensation and Pension (C&P) examinations, one of the most significant sources of evidence supporting a veteran’s claim for service connection are found in the veteran’s service medical records and service personnel records. Although specific numbers are unknown, a majority of mental health providers who conduct C&P examinations are not veterans and have limited knowledge and understanding of the records they are being asked to review. In cases of an initial posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) examination, the Federal Register requires C&P examiners to determine if the veteran’s claim is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the veteran’s service. This article reviews specific data within personnel records to help verify those elements. Additionally, perhaps one of the most difficult types of evaluations faced by any C&P examiner is a PTSD claim for personal assault (e.g., military sexual trauma). This article reviews the types of information within the records to help identify specific “Markers” associated with personal trauma.

Keywords

PTSD Disability examinations Forensic psychology Third party information Military psychology Military records 

References

  1. Avina, C. & O’Donohue, W. (2002). Sexual harassment and PTSD: Is sexual harassment diagnosable trauma? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 69–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R. & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 Sexual Harassment Survey. Arlington: Defense Manpower Data Center.Google Scholar
  3. Burkett, B. & Frueh, B. (2002). In reply to: Military records and veteran’s claim of combat exposure. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burkett, B. & Whitley, G. (1998). Stolen valor: How the Vietnam generation was robbed of its heroes and its history. Dallas: Verity.Google Scholar
  5. Cullen, K., Hall, M., and Golosinskiy, A. (2006). Ambulatory Surgery in the United States, 2006. National Health Statistic Report: US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 11, 23.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs (2008). Certification of clinicians performing compensation and pension examinations. VHA Directive 2008–005. Washington, D.C.: Department of Veterans Affairs.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs (2010). Rules and regulations. Federal Register, 75(133), 39843–39852.Google Scholar
  8. Doran v. Brown (1994). 6 Vet. App. 283, 290–91.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48, 1070–1076.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frueh, B. C., Elhai, J. D., Grubaugh, A. L., Monnier, J., Kashdan, T. B. & Sauvageot, J. A. (2005). Documented combat exposure of US veterans seeking treatment for combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 467–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg, S. A. & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington: Defense Manpower Data Center.Google Scholar
  13. McNally (2003). Progress and controversy in the study of posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 229–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Menegassi v. Shinseki (2011) U.S. App. LEXIS 8166 (Fed. Cir., Apr. 21, 2011).Google Scholar
  15. Moreau v. Brown (1996). 9 Vet. App. 389, 396.Google Scholar
  16. Patton v. West (1999). 12 Vet. App. 272, 282.Google Scholar
  17. Prins, A., Ouimette, P., Kimerling, R., Cameron, R. P., Hugelshofer, D. S., Shaw-Hegwer, … Sheikh, J. I. (2003). (PDF) The primary care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): Development and operating characteristics. Primary Care Psychiatry, 9, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, J. (2011). VA officials try to ease disability exam backlog. Washington DC: National Public Radio (Reporter).Google Scholar
  19. Ruff, R. (2009). Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(2), 131–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stender & Walker (1974). The National Personnel Records Center fire: A study in disaster. The American Archivist, 37(4), 521–549.Google Scholar
  21. United States Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (2005). Review of state variances in VA disability compensation payments. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  22. United States Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General (2007). Semiannual Report to Congress (Vol. 57). Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  23. VBA Office of Performance Analysis & Integrity (2011). 2011 Monday morning workload reports. http://www.vba.va.gov/REPORTS/mmwr/

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Compensation & Pension ServiceJames A. Haley VA Medical CenterTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations