Advertisement

Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 4, Issue 3–4, pp 235–244 | Cite as

The Psychological Consultative Examination for Social Security Disability

  • Michael D. ChafetzEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Social Security Administration (SSA) provides for federal disability insurance for disabled workers and their families through the Social Security Disability Insurance program and the social safety net for low-income disabled individuals through the Supplemental Security Income program. For the Mental Disorders (12.0) listings in the SSA Blue Book, psychologists provide consultative examinations, a form of medicolegal consultation (Chafetz; The Clinical Neuropsychologist 24:1,045–1,063, 2010). Psychologists also provide consultation directly to the Administrative Law Judges for cases going on appeal, or they might work directly for a Disability Determinations Services facility as an examiner for cases with mental disorders. This article describes the role of the psychologist in the Psychological Consultative Examination and its medicolegal context. Problems with non-credible behavior, particularly malingering, must be accounted for by the psychologist, which ultimately can help SSA with the validity of its decisions.

Keywords

Social security Disability Malingering Monetary impact Psychologists 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the editors of this journal for inviting this article based upon an address delivered to the American Psychological Association, 2011, in Washington, DC, invited by Division 40. I am grateful to Dr. Glenn Larrabee for being an early advocate of this work, to Dr. Paul Green for promoting discussions of these topics on his list, and to Dr. Julie Nelson for championing this work more recently. Moreover, I am grateful to the leadership in our professional organizations—AACN, NAN, and Division 40—for advocacy efforts concerning these issues. I would like to thank the many students who have provided me with much help and insight over the years: Jesse Lambert, Eileen Bibbins, Aparna Rao, Erika Prentkowski, Christina Binder, and Alex Biondolillo. I would especially like to thank Alex Biondolillo for a critical reading. This paper is dedicated to the Psychological Consultants working within and for DDSs all over the country. Several of these psychologists have contacted and advised this author about many aspects of this research, but specifically asked not to be named so as to avoid reprisal. They have given me much of their valuable time and many insights.

References

  1. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN). (2007). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) Practice Guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—text revision (4th ed.). Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H.,…Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426Google Scholar
  4. Carone, D. (2009). Test review of the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 309–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chafetz, M. D. (2008). Malingering on the Social Security disability consultative examination: Predictors and base rates. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 529–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chafetz, M. D. (2010). Symptom validity issues in the Psychological Consultative Examination for Social Security Disability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24, 1045–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chafetz, M. D. (2011). Reducing the probability of false positives in malingering detection of Social Security disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25, 1239–1252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chafetz, M.D. The A-Test: A symptom validity indicator embedded within a mental status examination for Social Security Disability. Applied Neuropsychology, in press.Google Scholar
  9. Chafetz, M. D., Abrahams, J. P. & Kohlmaier, J. (2007). Malingering on the Social Security disability consultative examination: A new rating scale. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 1–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chafetz, M. D. & Prentkowski, E. (2011). A case of malingering by proxy in a Social Security disability psychological consultative examination. Applied Neuropsychology, 18, 143–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chafetz, M. D., Prentkowski, E. & Rao, A. (2011). To work or not to work: Motivation (not low IQ) determines SVT findings. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26, 306–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colker, R. (2005). The disability pendulum: The first decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, F. L., Jr. & Callahan, J. L. (2011). Alternatives to a core curriculum to accomplish broad and general training: A scientist-practitioner perspective. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 5, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delis, D. C. & Wetter, S. R. (2007). Cogniform disorder and cogniform condition: Proposed diagnoses for excessive cognitive symptoms. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 589–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drob, S. L. & Meehan, K. B. (2000). The diagnosis of Ganser syndrome in the practice of forensic psychology. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 18(3), 37–62.Google Scholar
  16. Faust, D., Hart, K. & Guilmette, T. J. (1988). Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 578–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frazier, T. W. & Youngstrom, E. A. (2006). Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Using multiple sources of information. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(5), 614–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green, P. (2004). Manual for the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Edmonton: Green's Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg, S. A. & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg, S. A. & Shuman, D. W. (2007). When worlds collide: Therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greiffenstein, M. F. (2009). Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 286–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J. & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6, 218–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greve, K. W. & Bianchini, K. J. (2004). Setting empirical cut-offs on psychometric indicators of negative response bias: A methodological commentary with recommendations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 533–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffin, G. A., Normington, J., May, R. & Glassmire, D. (1996). Assessing dissimulation among Social Security disability income claimants. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1425–1430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammond, J. (2006). Symptom validity and cognition among claimants for social security disability benefits: Utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptoms (SIMS) and effect of warning. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Neuropsychology, October 15, 2006, San Antonio, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R. & Conference Participants (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howe, L. L. S. & Loring, D. W. (2009). Classification accuracy and predictive ability of the Medical Symptom Validity Test's Dementia Profile and General Memory Impairment Profile. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 329–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Iverson, G. L. & Lange, R. T. (2011). Mild traumatic brain injury. In M. R. Schoenberg & J. G. Scott (Eds.), The little black book of neuropsychology: a syndrome based approach (pp. 697–720). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaufmann, P. M. (2009). Protecting raw data and psychological tests from wrongful disclosure: A primer on the law and other persuasive strategies. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1130–1159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larrabee, G. J. (2005). Assessment of malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. LeBourgeois, H. W., Foreman, T. A. & Thompson, J. W. (2002). Novel cases: Malingering by animal proxy. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30, 520–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu, P. H. & Boone, K. B. (2002). Suspect cognitive symptoms in a 9-year-old child: Malingering by proxy. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 90–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCrea, M. (2008). Mild traumatic brain injury and post-concussion syndrome: The new evidence base for diagnosis and treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Merten, T., Bossink, L. & Schmand, B. (2007). On the limits of effort testing. Symptom validity tests and the severity of neurocognitive symptoms in nonlitigant patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 308–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller, L. S., Boyd, M. C., Cohn, A., Wilson, J. S., & McFarland, M. (2006). Prevalence of sub-optimal effort in disability applicants. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Millis, S. R. (2009). What clinicians really need to know about symptom exaggeration, insufficient effort, and malingering: Statistical and measurement matters. In J. E. Morgan & J. J. Sweet (Eds.), Neuropsychology of malingering casebook (pp. 488–493). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Milner, J. (1986). The child abuse potential inventory manual. DeKalb: Psytec, Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M. & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morton, D. A., III. (2010). Nolo's guide to social security disability (5th ed.). Berkeley: Nolo.Google Scholar
  40. Office of the Inspector General (2007). Audit report: Disability insurance beneficiaries convicted of crimes against the Social Security Administration's programs (no. A-06-06-16132), Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  41. Ohlemacher, S. (2010). Social Security disability system bogged down with requests. Retrieved from http://www.oneidadispatch.com/articles/2010/05/09/news/doc4be763e825022593194203.txt?viewmode=fullstory
  42. Pankratz, L. & Erickson, R. D. (1990). Two views of malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pratico, D. (2001). Eisenhower and social security: The origins of the disability program. New York: Writers Club Press.Google Scholar
  44. Richman, J., Green, P., Gervais, R., Flaro, L., Merten, T., Brockhaus, R. & Ranks, D. (2006). Objective tests of symptom exaggeration in independent medical examinations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Salekin, K. L. & Doane, B. M. (2009). Malingered intellectual disability: The value of available measures and methods. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 105–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singhal, A., Green, P., Ashaye, K., Shankar, K. & Gill, D. (2009). High specificity of the Medical Symptom Validity Test in patients with very severe memory impairment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 721–728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S. & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Social Security Administration (2008). Disability evaluation under social security (Blue Book). (SSA Publication No. 64–039). Retrieved from http://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/
  50. Social Security Advisory Board (2003). The social security definition of disability. Washington: Social Security Advisory Board.Google Scholar
  51. Stapleton, D., & Livermore, G. (2011). Costs, cuts, and consequences: Charting a new course for working-age people with disabilities. Center for Studying Disability Policy, Mathematica Policy Research, 11–03: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/disability/working-agepeople_ib.pdf
  52. Stevens, J. (1986). Is it organic or is it functional: Is it hysterical or is it malingering? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 9, 241–254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Strasburger, L. H., Gutheil, T. G. & Brodsky, A. (1997). On wearing two hats: Role conflict in serving as both psychotherapist and expert witness. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 448–456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Strub, R. L. & Black, F. W. (1993). The mental status examination in neurology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Co.Google Scholar
  55. Suhr, J. A. & Gunstad, J. (2002). “Diagnosis threat”: The effect of negative expectations on cognitive performance in head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 448–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sweet, J. J., Wolfe, P., Sattleberger, E., Numan, B., Rosenfeld, J. P., Clingerman, S. & Nies, K. (2000). Further investigation of traumatic brain injury versus insufficient effort with the California Verbal Learning Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 105–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Teichner, G. & Wagner, M. T. (2004). The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 455–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM. Test of memory malingering. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  59. United States (1990). Americans With Disabilities Act. Title 42, Chapter 126, Section 12101 (see: http://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm)
  60. Victor, T. L. & Boone, K. B. (2007). Identification of feigned mental retardation. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment (pp. 310–345). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations