Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 2, Issue 3–4, pp 225–237 | Cite as

Perceived Justice of Compensation Process for Return-to-Work: Development and Validation of a Scale

  • Renée-Louise FrancheEmail author
  • Colette N. Severin
  • Hyunmi Lee
  • Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
  • C. Gail Hepburn
  • Marjan Vidmar
  • Ellen MacEachen


The experience of injured workers is influenced by multiple systems—the workplace, the healthcare system, and the workers’ compensation system. Little research has been conducted on the impact of the workers’ compensation system on injured workers’ personal experience and on the justice of the workers’ compensation process. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measure of the justice of the compensation process. Injured workers (n = 446) with musculoskeletal injuries, in Ontario, Canada, filing a lost-time claim, completed a telephone survey 6 months post-injury. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted with two separate samples, and concurrent validity was examined. The four hypothesized factors emerged: distributive justice, procedural justice, informational justice, and interpersonal justice factors accounted for 96.3% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analyses had satisfactory fit indices to confirm the initial model. Alpha coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.92. Concurrent validity of the scale was supported: relationships of distributive and procedural justice with claim status, claim processing delay, perception of going back to work too soon, duration of work accommodation, and satisfaction with work accommodation were in the expected direction. Workers’ experience of the justice of the compensation process can now be measured with a psychometrically sound and theoretically based instrument. This instrument offers researchers the opportunity to focus on the justice of the compensation process of injured workers. It can increase the attention that policy-makers, compensation management, healthcare providers, and other return-to-work stakeholders give to the impact of the compensation system and provide a broadened view of workers’ experience.


Instrumentation Justice Return-to-work Workers’ compensation 


  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In I. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analyses of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Brockner, J., DeWitt, R. L., Grover, S., & Reed, T. (1990). When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers’ explanations of a layoff and survivors’ reactions to the layoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bültmann, U., Franche, R., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Côté, P. (2007). Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Quality of Life Research, 16(7), 1167–1178.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Cassidy, J. D., Côté, P., Carroll, L. J., & Kristman, V. (2005). Incidence and course of low back pain episodes in the general population. Spine, 30(24), 2817–2823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, S., Tyrrell, D. A. J., & Smith, A. P. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England Journal of Medicine, 325(9), 606–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Colquitt, J. A. & Shaw, J. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113–152). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Conlon, D. E., Meyer, C. J., & Nowakowski, J. M. (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior? In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 301–327). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Cropanzano, R. & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 319–372). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. DeVogli, E., Ferrie, J. E., Chandola, T., Kivimaki, M., & Marmot, M. G. (2007). Unfairness and health: Evidence from the Whitehall II Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61, 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F., & Munson, L. J. (1998). The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 683–692.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M., & Helkama, K. (2001). Organizational justice evaluations, job control, and occupational strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 418–424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Elovainio, M., Kivimaki, M., & Vahtera, J. (2002). Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. American Journal of Public Health, 92(1), 105–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eskew, D. E. (1993). The role of organizational justice in organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Folger, R. & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 3, 141–183.Google Scholar
  21. Franche, R.-L., Cullen, K., Clarke, J., Irvin, E., Sinclair, S., & Frank, J. (2005). Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(4), 607–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Franche, R.-L., Severin, C. N., Hogg-Johnson, S., Côté, P., Vidmar, M., & Lee, H. (2007). The impact of early workplace-based return-to-work strategies on work absence duration: A 6-month longitudinal study following an occupational musculoskeletal injury. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 49(9), 960–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franche, R.-L., Carnide, N., Hogg-Johnson, S., Côté, P., Breslin, F. C., Bültmann, U., et al. (2009). Course, diagnosis and treatment of depressive symptomatology in workers following a workplace injury: A prospective cohort study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 534–546.Google Scholar
  24. Francis, L. & Barling, J. (2005). Organizational injustice and psychological strain. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 250–261.Google Scholar
  25. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Greenberg, J. (1996). How do people manage impressions of organizational justice? In J. Greenberg (Ed.), The quest for justice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Guthrie, R. & Jansz, J. (2006). Women’s experience in the workers’ compensation system. Journal of Occupational Rehabiliation, 16(3), 474–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofmann, R. (1995). Establishing factor validity using variable reduction in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 572–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jõreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Mooresville: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  30. Kausto, J., Elo, A.-L., Lipponen, J., & Elovainio, M. (2005). Moderating effects of job insecurity in the relationships between procedural justice and employee well-being: Gender difference. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. & Glaser, R. (1995). Psychoneuroimmunology and health consequence: Data and shared mechanisms. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 269–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Laaksonen, M., Rahkonen, O., Martikainene, P., & Lahelman, E. (2006). Associations of psychosocial working conditions with self-rated general health and mental health among municipal employees. Internal Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 79, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levanthal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 211–240). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  34. Lippel, K. (2007). Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: A Quebec study. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 30(4–5), 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacEachen, E., Ferrier, S., Kosny, A., & Chambers, L. (2007). A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 5(2), 41–62.Google Scholar
  36. MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., & Ferrier, S. (2007). Unexpected barriers in return to work: Lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work, 29(2), 155–164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts, K. & Young, W. (1997). Procedural fairness, return to work, and the decision to dispute in workers’ compensation. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 10(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts, K. & Markel, K. S. (2001). Claiming in the name of fairness: Organizational justice and the decision to file for workplace injury compensation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(4), 332–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts-Yates, C. (2003). The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: The need for new operational frameworks. Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(16), 898–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. SAS. (2004). SAS statistical software version 9.1 (computer software).Google Scholar
  43. Shain, M. (2001). Returning to work after illness or injury: The role of fairness. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(5), 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sinclair, S. J., Hogg-Johnson, S. A., Mondloch, M. V., & Shields, S. A. (1997). The effectiveness of an early active intervention program for workers with soft tissue injuries: the Early Claimant Cohort study. Spine, 22(24), 2919–2931.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Statistics Canada. (2006). Labour force survey microdata file (71M0001XCB). Canada, 2-1-0006.Google Scholar
  46. Steptoe, A., Evans, O., & Fieldman, G. (1997). Perceptions of control over work: Psychophysiological responses to self-paced and externally-paced tasks in an adult population sample. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(3), 211–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Strunin, L. & Boden, L. I. (2004). The workers’ compensation system: Worker friend or foe? American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 45(4), 338–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tepper, B. J. (2001). Health consequences of organizational injustice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Injured Worker Participatory Research Project. (2001). Making the system better: Injured workers speak out on compensation and return to work issues in Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Workplace & Safety Insurance Board.Google Scholar
  50. Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. van den Bos, K. & Lind, E. A. (2002). Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Workplace Safety & Insurance Board. (2006). Workplace safety and insurance board 2005 annual report (pp. 1–56). Canada: Workplace Safety & Insurance Board.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renée-Louise Franche
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  • Colette N. Severin
    • 2
  • Hyunmi Lee
    • 2
  • Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
    • 2
    • 4
  • C. Gail Hepburn
    • 2
    • 6
  • Marjan Vidmar
    • 2
  • Ellen MacEachen
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Occupational Health & Safety Agency for Healthcare in BC (OHSAH)VancouverCanada
  2. 2.Institute for Work & HealthTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
  4. 4.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  6. 6.University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations