Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 182–197

Inaccuracies About the MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale in the Reply by Ben-Porath, Greve, Bianchini, and Kaufman (2009)

  • Carolyn L. Williams
  • James N. Butcher
  • Carlton S. Gass
  • Edward Cumella
  • Zina Kally
Article

Abstract

Based on a focused review and careful analysis of a large amount of published research, Butcher et al. (Psychol Inj and Law 1(3):191–209, 2008) concluded that the Fake Bad Scale (FBS) does not appear to be a sufficiently reliable or valid measure of the construct “faking bad”. Butcher et al. (Psychol Inj and Law 1(3):191–209, 2008) pointed out examples of errors in some of the most widely cited studies (including meta-analytic) used to support the FBS and described potential biases if the FBS is used to impute the motivation to malinger in those reaching its variable and imprecise cutoff scores. In a response to this article, Ben-Porath et al. (Psychol Inj Law 2:62–85, 2009) dismissed all the concerns raised in it with suggestions that our conclusions were based on faulty premises, misunderstandings of basic concepts, misleading descriptions of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) research, flawed analyses, and so on. This reply corrects some of Ben-Porath and colleagues’ (Psychol Inj Law 2:62–85, 2009) multiple misrepresentations of the points made in Butcher et al. (Psychol Inj and Law 1(3):191–209, 2008) and identifies eight logical fallacies relevant to the FBS controversy. We end with a challenge to other psychologists to fully examine the underlying FBS research before adopting this scale in their clinical practice.

Keywords

Bias MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale FBS Symptom validity Malingering 

References

  1. Anderson, M. et al. v. E & S International Enterprises, Inc et al. (2008). Case #RG05-211076, California Superior Court for the County of Alameda. Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D. (2008, March 5). Personality check: Malingerer test roils personal-injury law. Wall Street Journal, p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Porath, Y.S. & Tellegen, A. (2007a). MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (FBS). Retrieved September 3, 2007, from http://www.upress.umn.edu/tests/mmpi2_fbs.html.
  4. Ben-Porath, Y.S. & Tellegen, A. (2007b). MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (FBS). Retrieved September 3, 2007, from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/resources/fbs.html.
  5. Ben-Porath, Y.S. & Tellegen, A. (2007c). MMPI-2 FBS (Symptom Validity Scale). Retrieved December 4, 2007, from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/resources/fbs.html
  6. Ben-Porath, Y.S. & Tellegen, A. (2007d). MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (FBS). Retrieved December 4, 2007, from http://www.upress.umn.edu/tests/mmpi2_fbs.html
  7. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Porath, Y. S., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Kaufman, P. M. (2009). The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) is an empirically validated measure of over-reporting in personal injury litigants and claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008). Psychological Injury and the Law, 2, 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butcher, J. N., & Williams, C. L. (2000). Essentials of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-A clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butcher, J. N., & Williams, C. L. (2009). Personality assessment with the MMPI-2: Historical roots, international adaptations, and current challenges. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, 1(1), 105–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butcher, J. N., Arbisi, P. A., Atlis, M. M., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). The construct validity of the Lees-Haley Fake Bad Scale: Does this scale measure somatic malingering and feigned emotional distress? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 473–485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butcher, J. N., Gass, C. S., Cumella, E., Kally, Z., & Williams, C. L. (2008). Potential for bias in MMPI-2 assessments using the Fake Bad Scale (FBS). Psychological Injury and the Law, 1(3), 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Cumella, E. J., Wall, A. D., & Kerr-Almeida, N. (2000). MMPI-2 in the inpatient assessment of women with eating disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 387–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davidson v Strawberry Petroleum & Haddle (2007). Case #05-4320, Florida 13th Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. Google Scholar
  16. Dikmen, S., & Reitan, R. M. (1974). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory correlates of dysphasic language disturbances. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 675–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dikmen, S., & Reitan, R. M. (1977). MMPI correlates of adaptive ability deficits in patients with brain lesions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 165, 247–254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahlstrom, W. G., & Welsh, G. S. (1956). Basic readings in the MMPI. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972). An MMPI handbook. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dean, A. C., Boone, K. R., Kim, M. S., Curiel, A. R., Martin, D. J., Victor, T. L. et al. (2008). Examination of the impact of ethnicity on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Fake Bad Scale. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
  21. Downing, S. K., Denney, R. L., Spray, B. J., Houston, C. M., & Halfaker, D. A. (2008). Examining the relationship between the Reconstructed Clinical Scales and the Fake Bad Scale of the MMPI-2. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 680–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gass, C. S. (2006). Use of the MMPI-2 in neuropsychological evaluations. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), MMPI-2: A practitioner’s guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Gass, C. S., & Ansley, J. (1994). MMPI correlates of poststroke neurobehavioral deficits. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 461–469.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gass, C. S., Luis, C. A., Rayls, K., & Mittenberg, W. B. (1999). Psychological status and its influences in acute traumatic brain injury: An MMPI-2 study [Abstract]. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, R. L. (2000). The MMPI-2: An interpretive manual (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  26. Greiffenstein, M. F., & Baker, W. J. (2001). Comparison of premorbid and postinjury MMPI-2 profiles in late post concussion claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15, 162–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., Gola, T., Donders, J., & Miller, L. J. (2002). The FBS in atypical and severe closed head injury litigants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1591–1600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Greiffenstein, M. F., Fox, D., & Lees-Haley, P. R. (2007). The MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale in detection of noncredible brain injury claims. In K. Boone (Ed.), Detection of noncredible cognitive performance, pp. 210–235. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Black, F. W., Heinly, M. T., Love, J. M., Swift, D. A. et al. (2006a). The prevalence of cognitive malingering in persons reporting exposure to occupational and environmental substances. NeuroToxicology, 27, 940–950.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., Brenna, A., & Heinley, M. T. (2006b). Sensitivity and specificity of the MMPI-2 validity indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 491–512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guez, M., Brannstrom, R., Nyberg, L., Toolanen, G., & Hildingsson, C. (2005). Neuropsychological functioning and MMPI-2 profiles in chronic neck pain: A comparison of whiplash and non-traumatic groups. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 151–163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota) III. The measurement of symptomatic depression. Journal of Psychology, 14, 73–84.Google Scholar
  33. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1942). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Schedule. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hsieh, S. (2008, May 19). Plaintiff turns tables on ‘Fake Bad Scale’. Lawyers USA, pp. 1, 29.Google Scholar
  35. James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  36. Lamberty, G. J. (2008). Understanding somatization in the practice of clinical neuropsychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Larrabee, G. J. (1998). Somatic malingering on the MMPI and MMPI-2 in personal injury litigants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 179–188.Google Scholar
  38. Larrabee, G. J. (2007). Evaluation of exaggerated health and injury symptomatology. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficit, pp. 264–286. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lees-Haley, P. R. (1992). Efficacy of MMPI-2 validity scales and MCMI-II modifier scales for detecting spurious PTSD claims: F, F-K, Fake Bad Scale, Ego Strength, Subtle-Obvious Subscales, DIS, and DEB. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48, 681–689.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lees-Haley, P. R., English, L. T., & Glenn, W. J. (1991). A Fake Bad Scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports, 68, 203–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Limbaugh-Kirker & Kirker v Dicosta (2009). Case #06-CA-00706, Florida 20th Circuit in and for Lee County, Florida. Google Scholar
  42. McCrae, M. A. (2008). Mild traumatic brain injury and post concussion syndrome. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Meehl, P. E., & Hathaway, S. R. (1946). The K factor as a suppressor variable. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 525–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., & Demakis, G. J. (2006). Meta-Analysis of the MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale: Utility in forensic practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 39–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Nichols, D. S., & Crowhurst, B. (2006). Use of the MMPI-2 in inpatient mental health settings. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), MMPI-2: A practitioner's guide, pp. 195–252. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearson Assessments. (2007a, January 11). MMPI-2 Fake Bad Scale (FBS): FBS added to the MMPI-2 standard scoring materials [Press Release]. Retrieved September 3, 2007, from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/news/pr011107.htm
  47. Pearson Assessments. (2007b, January 11). FBS (Symptom Validity Scale) added to MMPI-2 standard scoring materials: Scale helps identify non-credible reporting [Press Release]. Retrieved November 12, 2007, from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/news/pr011107.htm
  48. Pope, K. S. (2009) Logical fallacies in psychology: 21 types. Retrieved March 31, 2009 from http://kspope.com/fallacies/fallacies.php
  49. Putnam, S. H., & Millis, S. R. (1994). Psychosocial factors in the development and maintenance of chronic somatic and functional symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy, 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
  50. Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Society for Personality Assessment. (2006). Standards for education and training in psychological assessment : Position of the Society for Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 355–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solomon & Solomon v T. K. Power & Goodwin (2008). Case #06-CA-00388, Florida 4th Circuit, in and for Duval County, Florida. Google Scholar
  53. Stith & Stith v Williams & State Farm Mutual Insurance (2008). Case #2003 CA 010945 AG, Florida 15th Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. Google Scholar
  54. United States v Bitton (2008, July 1). Memorandum Decision and Order. Case #2:05-CR-661 TS. United States District Court of Utah Central Division.Google Scholar
  55. Upchurch v School Board of Broward Co. (2009). OJCC Case #98-024122KSP, Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, Judges of Compensation Claims, Broward District. Google Scholar
  56. Williams v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007). Case #04-CA-008892, Florida 13th Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. Google Scholar
  57. Vandergracht & Vandergracht v Progressive Express, USAA Insurance Company, & TIG Insurance Company (2005). Case #02-04552, Florida 13th Circuit in and for Hillsborough County, Florida. Google Scholar
  58. Young, G. L. (2008). Psychological injury and law: editorial introducing a journal and an association. Psychological Injury and Law, 1, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Youngjohn, J. R., Davis, D., & Wolf, I. (1997). Head injury and the MMPI-2: paradoxical severity effects and the influence of litigation. Psychological Assessment, 9, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn L. Williams
    • 1
  • James N. Butcher
    • 1
  • Carlton S. Gass
    • 2
  • Edward Cumella
    • 3
  • Zina Kally
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Miami Veterans Affairs Healthcare SystemMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Remuda Program for Eating DisordersWickenburgUSA

Personalised recommendations