Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 1477–1485 | Cite as

Experimental investigation on the heat transfer performance of evacuated tube solar collector using CuO nanofluid and water

  • Woobin Kang
  • Yunchan Shin
  • Honghyun ChoEmail author
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The efficiency of an evacuated tube solar collector was experimentally measured and analyzed according to the size of CuO nanoparticle and the concentration of the CuO nanofluid. In addition, the efficiency of the evacuated tube solar collector using CuO nanofluid as a working fluid was compared with that when water was used. As a result, the efficiency of the evacuated tube solar collector improved as the concentration of the CuO nanofluid increased at low concentration. Further, the efficiency of the evacuated tube solar collector was higher at a mass flux rate of 598 kg/s·m2 than at 420 kg/s·m2. The highest efficiency of the solar collector with 40 nm-CuO nanofluid was 69.1 %, an improvement of 2.0 % compared to 80 nm-CuO nanofluid. The most optimal concentration of the 40 nm-CuO nanofluid was 0.5 vol% and an improvement of thermal efficiency was 7.2 % compared to water. In addition, at this concentration, the efficiency improved by 4.4 %, 2.3 % and 0.3 % compared to that at concentrations of 0.1 vol%, 0.3 vol% and 0.7 vol%, respectively. The use of CuO nanofluid in the evacuated tube solar collector can improve the efficiency and can maintain the high efficiency for wide operating conditions compared to water.

Keywords

Evacuated tube solar collector Nanofluid Thermal efficiency CuO (copper oxide) Heat loss parameter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T. O. Ahmadu, C. O. Folayan and F. O. Anafi, Modeling, simulation and optimization of a solar absorption air conditioning system for an office block in Zaria, Nigeria, International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 24 (2016).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Khaldi, A. I. N. Korti and S. Abboudi, Improving the airflow distribution within an indirect solar dryer by modifications based on computational fluid dynamics, International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 25 (2017).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H. W. Chiam, W. H. Azmi, N. A. Usri, R. Mamat and N. M. Adam, Thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3 nanofluids for different based ratio of water and ethylene glycol mixture, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 81 (2017) 420–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. S. Sundar, M. H. Farooky, S. N. Sarada and M. K. Singh, Experimental thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol and water mixture based low volume concentration of Al2O3 and CuO nanofluids, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 41 (2013) 41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. A. Charab, S. Movahedirad and R. Norouzbeigi, Thermal conductivity of Al2O3+TiO2/water nanofluid: Model development and experimental validation, Applied Thermal Engineering, 119 (2017) 42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. I. Pryazhnikov, A. V. Minakov, V. Y. Rudyak and D. V. Guzei, Thermal conductivity measurements of nanofluids, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 104 (2017) 1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. G. P. M. B. Kim and C. Y. Park, Change of thermal conductivity and cooling performance for water based Al2O3-surfactant nanofluid with time lapse, International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 26 (2018).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Noghrehabadi, E. Hajidavaloo and M. Moravej, Experimental investigation of efficiency of square flat-plate solar collector using SiO2/water nanofluid, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 8 (2016) 378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Q. He, S. Zeng and S. Wang, Experimental investigation on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors with nanofluids, Applied Thermal Engineering, 88 (2015) 165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. K. Verma, A. K. Tiwari and D. S. Chauhan, Experimental evaluation of flat plate solar collector using nanofluids, Energy Conversion and Management, 134 (2017) 103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. J. Moghadam, M. Farzane-Gord, M. Sajadi and M. Hoseyn-Zadeh, Effects of CuO/water nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 58 (2014) 9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Z. Said, M. A. Sabiha, R. Saidur, A. Hepbasli, N. A. Rahim, S. Mekhilef and T. A. Ward, Performance enhancement of a flat plate solar collector using Titanium dioxide nanofluid and Polyethylene Glycol dispersant, Journal of Cleaner Production, 92 (2015) 343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Z. Said, R. Saidur and N. A. Rahim, Energy and exergy analysis of a flat plate solar collector using different sizes of aluminium oxide based nanofluid, Journal of Cleaner Production, 133 (2016) 518–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    T. Yousefi, E. Shojaeizadeh, F. Veysi and S. Zinadini, An experimental investigation on the effect of pH variation of MWCNT–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector, Solar Energy, 86 (2012) 771–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Faizal, R. Saidur, S. Mekhilef and M. A. Alim, Energy, economic and environmental analysis of metal oxides nanofluid for flat-plate solar collector, Energy Conversion and Management, 76 (2013) 162–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    L. Lu, Z.-H. Liu and H.-S. Xiao, Thermal performance of an open thermosyphon using nanofluids for hightemperature evacuated tubular solar collectors, Solar Energy, 85 (2011) 379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Z.-H. Liu, R.-L. Hu, L. Lu, F. Zhao and H.-s. Xiao, Thermal performance of an open thermosyphon using nanofluid for evacuated tubular high temperature air solar collector, Energy Conversion and Management, 73 (2013) 135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Rybár, M. Beer and M. Cehlár, Thermal power measurement of the novel evacuated tube solar collector and conventional solar collector during simultaneous operation, Measurement, 88 (2016) 153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. Ghaderian and N. A. C. Sidik, An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3/distilled water nanofluid on the energy efficiency of evacuated tube solar collector, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 108 (2017) 972–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Mahendran, G. C. Lee, K. V. Sharma and A. Shahrani, Performance of evacuated tube solar collector using waterbased titanium oxide nanofluid, Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 3 (2012) 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    M. A. Sabiha, R. Saidur, S. Hassani, Z. Said and S. Mekhilef, Energy performance of an evacuated tube solar collector using single walled carbon nanotubes nanofluids, Energy Conversion and Management, 105 (2015) 1377–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    H. Kim, J. Ham, C. Park and H. Cho, Theoretical investigation of the efficiency of a U-tube solar collector using various nanofluids, Energy, 94 (2016) 497–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    H. Kim, J. Kim and H. Cho, Experimental study on performance improvement of U-tube solar collector depending on nanoparticle size and concentration of Al2O3 nanofluid, Energy, 118 (2017) 1304–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Kim, J. Kim and H. Cho, Review of thermal performance and efficiency in evacuated tube solar collector with various nanofluids, International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 25 (2017).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. A. Ersöz, Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe, Renewable Energy, 96 (2016) 244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Q. J. Hashim, A. Hussain and K. F. Sultan, Experimental analysis on thermal efficiency of evacuated tube solar collector by using nanofluids, International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 4 (2015) 19–28Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Moffat, Using uncertainty analysis in the planning of an experiment, Fluids Engineering, 107 (1985) 173–182Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. Ghaderian, N. A. C. Sidik, A. Kasaeian, S. Ghaderian, A. Okhovat, A. Pakzadeh, S. Samion and W. J. Yahya, Performance of copper oxide/distilled water nanofluid in evacuated tube solar collector (ETSC) water heater with internal coil under thermosyphon system circulations, Applied Thermal Engineering, 121 (2017) 520–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate SchoolChosun UniversityGwangjuKorea
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChosun UniversityGwangjuKorea

Personalised recommendations