Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 5937–5945 | Cite as

An uncertainty analysis of the time-resolved fuel injection pressure wave based on BOSCH method for a common rail diesel injector with a varying current wave pattern

  • Youngju Lee
  • Choong Hoon LeeEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

A system capable of measuring the time-resolved fuel injection rate of an injector with a varying current pattern supplied to the injector was constructed. The control of the driving of a common rail diesel injector is achieved by controlling the current waveform supplied to the injector. In order to control various current waveforms flowing in the common rail injector, 80 V of power supplied to the injector was switched using a negative-positive-negative (NPN) 2N3055 transistor. The transistor-transistor logic (TTL) switching signal supplied to the base terminal of the NPN 2N3055 transistor was generated from the capture compare PWM (CCP) terminal of a microcontroller. The PWM signal generated from the CCP pin creates five patterns of waveforms by combining the peak-and-hold conditions. In the first part of the 1ms injection period, the duty ratio is 100 %, while the remaining part has a waveform with a greatly reduced duty ratio. The duty ratio used in this study was 10 % or 30 %. The time-resolved pressure wave caused by fuel injection in the Bosch method was repeatedly measured. For an uncertainty analysis, 39 repetitive measurements were taken per fuel injection condition. The rail pressures used in this study were 80, 110 and 140 MPa. With five pick-and-hold current waves supplied to the injector under a rail pressure condition, the time-resolved pressure waves caused by the fuel injection tended to be almost equal during the peak duration, whereas those during the hold duration differed. The duration of the pressure wave caused by the fuel injection is prolonged at a high hold current. When the common rail pressure is high, the slope of the pressure wave in the pick interval is steeper. A parameter that can effectively evaluate the optimal current control pattern for lower power consumption and thermal dissipation of the injector solenoid is also presented.

Keywords

Bosch method Current profile Duty ratio Injected fuel pressure wave Peak and hold Pulse width modulation (PWM) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. S. Graham, S. Crossley, T. Harcombe, N. Keeler and T. Williams, Beyond Euro VI–Development of a next generation fuel injector for commercial vehicles, SAE paper No. 2014–01–1435 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Matsumoto, C. Klose, J. Schneider, N. Nakane, D. Ueda and S. Kondo, 4th generation diesel common rail system: Realizing ideal structure function for diesel engine, SAE paper No. 2013–01–1590 (2013).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    V. Macian, R. Payri, S. Ruiz, M. Bardi and A. H. Plazas, Experimental study of the relationship between injection rate shape and Diesel ignition using a novel piezo–actuated direct–acting injector, Applied Energy, 118 (2017) 100–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Robert Bosch GmbH, Bosch automotive handbook, 7th ed., John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England (2007) 705–717.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. Schommers, F. Duvinage, M. Stotz, A. Peters, S. Ellwanger, K. Koyanagi and H. Gildein, Potential of common rail injection system for passenger car DI diesel engines, SAE paper No. 2000–01–0944 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Vanegas, H. Won, C. Felsch, M. Gauding and N. Peters, Experimental investigation of the effect of multiple injections on pollutant formation in a common–rail DI diesel engine, SAE paper No. 2008–01–1191 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Matsui, K. Shimoyama, S. Nonaka, I. Chiba and S. Hidaka, Development of high–performance diesel engine compliant with Euro–V, SAE paper No. 2008–01–1198 (2008).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y. Hotta, M. Inayoshi, K. Nakakita, K. Fujiwara and I. Sakata, Achieving lower exhaust emissions and better performance in an HSDI diesel engine with multiple injection, SAE paper No. 2005–01–0928 (2005).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Badami, F. Mallamo, F. Millo and E. E. Rossi, Influence of multiple injection strategies on emissions, combustion noise and BSFC of a DI common rail diesel engine, SAE Paper No. 2002–01–0503 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Kato, K. Matsuura, T. Hakozaki, O. Suzuki, S. Haraguchi, Y. Yoshimi, T. Katano and T. Hashimoto, Influence of a fast injection rate common rail injector for the spray and combustion characteristics of diesel engine, SAE paper No. 2011–01–0687 (2011).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Shundoh, M. Komori, K. Tsujimura and S. Kobayashi, NOx reduction from diesel combustion using pilot injection with high pressure fuel injection, SAE Technical Paper No. 920461 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    T. Minami, K. Takeuchi and N. Shimazaki, Reduction of diesel engine NOx using pilot injection, SAE Technical Paper No. 950611 (1995).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. O'Connor and M. Musculus, Post injections for soot reduction in diesel engines: A review of current understanding, SAE paper No. 2013–01–0917 (2013).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Y. S. Park and C. S. Bae, Effects of single and double post injections on diesel PCCI combustion, SAE paper No. 2013–01–0010 (2013).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    M. Bobba, M. Musculus and W. Neel, Effect of post injections on in–cylinder and exhaust soot for low–temperature combustion in a heavy–duty diesel engine, SAE paper No. 2010–01–0612 (2016).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    http://europe.autonews.com/article/20061113/ANE/61109031/injector–wars:–piezo–vs.–solenoid.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    http://www.china–balin.com/news–248.html.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    L. Postrioti, G. Buitoni, F. C. Pesce and C. Ciaravino, Zeuch method–based injection rate analysis of a commonrail system operated with advanced injection strategies, FUEL, 128 (2014) 188–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    W. Zeuch, Neue Verfahren zur Messung des Einspritzgesetzes und Einspritz–Regelmassigkeit von Diesel–Einspritzpumpen, MZT, 22 (9) (1961).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    K. R. Cho, Development of injector controller, Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Science Journal, 8 (2) (2018) 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Y. Roh and K. Cho, Development of multi–channel common rail diesel injector driver, KSAE Fall Conference (2004) 274–279.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. S. Graham, S. Crossley, T. Harcombe, N. Keeler and T. Williams, Beyond Euro VI–Development of a next generation fuel injector for commercial vehicles, SAE paper No. 2014–01–1435 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    G. Chiatti, O. Chiavola, M. Palazzoni and F. Palmieri, Diesel spray modeling under off–axis needle displacement, SAE paper No. 2015–01–922 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    W. Bosch, The fuel rate indicator: A new measuring in strument for display of the characteristics of individual injection, SAE Paper No. 660749 (1966).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    TI designs documents, Texas instruments, current controlled driver for AC solenoids, TIDU584A–November 2014–Revised February (2014).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    J. G. Kim, Driver for diesel common rail pressure control and injector using a micro–controller, M.S. Thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology (2015).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. J. Tennison, T. L. Georjon, P. V. Farrell and R. D. Rolf, An experimental and numerical study of sprays from a common rail injection system for use in an HSDI diesel engine, SAE Paper No. 980810 (1998).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    K. T. Kim and C. H. Lee, A study on characteristics of injected fuel pressure waves of a solenoid type injector diesel common rail injector with controlling current wave for driving the injector, ILASS–KOREA, 21 (3) (2016) 155–161.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    T. G. Beckwith, R. D. Marangoni and V. J. H. Lienhard, Mechanical measurements, 6th Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall (2007) 34–66.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    J. H. Zhao, P. Yue, L. Grekhov and X. Ma, Hold current effects on the power losses of high–speed solenoid valve for common–rail injector, Applied Thermal Engineering, 128 (2018) 1579–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Automotive EngineeringSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations