Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 5785–5796 | Cite as

Prediction of ship fuel consumption by using an artificial neural network

  • Miyeon Jeon
  • Yoojeong Noh
  • Yongwoo Shin
  • O-Kaung Lim
  • Inwon Lee
  • Daeseung Cho
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

A smart ship collects various data with large volume, such as voyage, machinery, and weather data. Thus, big data analysis for smart ships is an important technology that can be widely applied to improve ship maintenance, operational efficiency, and equipment life management. In this study, an accurate regression model for the fuel consumption of the main engine by using an artificial neural network (ANN) was proposed by big data analysis including data collection, clustering, compression, and expansion. To obtain an accurate regression model, various numbers of hidden layers and neurons and different types of activation functions were tested in the ANN, and their effects on the accuracy and efficiency of the regression analysis were studied. The proposed regression model using ANN is a more accurate and efficient model to predict the fuel consumption of the main engine than polynomial regression and support vector machine.

Keywords

Artificial neural network Big data analysis Ship fuel consumption Smart ship Regression analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Haranen, P. Pakkanen, R. Kariranta and J. Salo, White, grey and black–box modeling in ship performance evaluation, Hull Performance and Insight Conference, Pavone Canavese, Torino, Italy (2016).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. P. Perera and B. Mo, Machine intelligence based data handling framework for ship energy efficiency, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66 (10) (2017) 8659–8666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Jonge, Data–driven analysis of vessel performance, Master Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2017).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Zhang, Q. Meng, Z. Xiao and X. Fu, A novel ship trajectory reconstruction approach using AIS data, Ocean Engineering, 159 (1) (2018) 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. R. A. Morillas, I. C. Garcia and U. Zolzer, Ship detection based on SVM using color and texture features, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligence Systems, 15 (4) (2015) 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Ban, J. Yang, P. Chen, J. Xiong and Q. Wang, Ship track regression based on support vector machine, IEEE Access, 5 (2017) 18836–18846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. Kawan, H. Wang, G. Li and K. Chhantyal, Data–driven modeling of ship motion prediction based on support vector regression, Proc. of the 58th Conference on Simulation and Modelling (SIMS 58), Reykjavik, Iceland (2017) 350–354.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. S. Aisjah and S. Arifin, Maritime weather prediction using fuzzy logic in java sea for shipping feasibility, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10 (S13) (2013) 112–122.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. S. Sarle, Neural networks and statistical models, Proc. of the Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC, USA (1994) 1538–1550.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. E. Smith and A. K. Mason, Cost estimation predictive modeling: Regression versus neural network, The Engineering Economist, 42 (2) (2010) 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. Hong, Q. Ren, X. Hu, T. Lin, L. Shi, G. Zhang and X. Li, Modeling energy–related CO2 emissions from office buildings using general regression neural network, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129 (2018) 168–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    N. Mishra, H. K. Soni, S. Sharma and Y. K. Upadhyay, Development and analysis of artificial neural network models for rainfall prediction by using time–series data, International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 10 (1) (2018) 16–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. M. Al–Ghobari, M. S. EI–Marazky, A. Z. Dewidar and M. A. Mattar, Prediction of wind drift and evaporation losses from sprinkler irrigation using neural network and multiple regression techniques, Agricultural Water Management, 195 (1) (2018) 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. P. Petersen, D. J. Jacobsen and O. Winther, Statistical modelling for ship propulsion efficiency, Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 17 (1) (2012) 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G. Li, H. Zhang, B. Kawan, H. Wang, O. L. Osen and A. Styve, Analysis and modeling of sensor data for ship motion prediction, Proc. of the Oceans Conference, Shanghai, China (2016) 10–13.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    L. P. Perera and B. Mo, Marine engine operating regions under principal component analysis to evaluate ship performance and navigation behavior, IFAC–PapersOnLine, 49 (23) (2016a) 512–517.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    L. P. Perera and B. Mo, Data compression of ship performance and navigation information under deep learning, Proc. of the 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016), Busan, Korea (2016b) OMAE2016–54093.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Jeon, J. Lim and Y. Noh, A study on big data technology and collection, processing and analysis method for ship, The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers Annual Conference, Korea, 3083–3085.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    P. J. Green and B. W. Silverman, Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: A roughness penalty approach, Chapman and Hall, London, UK (1994).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. Sridharan, Gaussian mixture models and the EM algorithm, https://people.csail.mit.edu/rameshvs/content/gmm–em. pdf (2018).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. C. de Amorim and C. Hennig, Recovering the number of clusters in data sets with noise features using feature rescaling factors, Information Sciences, 324 (2015) 126–145.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. H. Hassoun, Fundamentals of artificial neural networks, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1995).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A. L. Maas, A. Y. Hannun and A. Y. Ng, Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models, International Conference on Machine Learning, 30 (1) (2013) 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miyeon Jeon
    • 1
  • Yoojeong Noh
    • 1
  • Yongwoo Shin
    • 1
  • O-Kaung Lim
    • 1
  • Inwon Lee
    • 2
  • Daeseung Cho
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringPusan National UniversityBusanKorea
  2. 2.Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean EngineeringPusan National UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations