Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 11, pp 5251–5261 | Cite as

Comparative study of small crack growth behavior between specimens with and without machining-induced residual stress of alloy GH4169

  • Lei Zhu
  • Zhirong Wu
  • Xuteng Hu
  • Yingdong SongEmail author


We investigated the small fatigue crack behavior of alloy GH4169 by using single-edge-notch tension specimens. Residual stress introduced by machining process was taken into consideration, and two stress levels were selected. A comparison was made between the experimental results of specimens with and without machining-induced residual stress. The results indicated that fatigue cracks of the two types of specimens initiated from surface inclusions or grain boundaries. For both types of specimens, small cracks grew very slowly when the crack lengths were less than 500 μm. The small crack growth might decelerate and retard temporarily for the existence of grain boundaries. The residual stress effect on crack growth can be identified at σmax = 380 MPa, i.e., compressive residual stress might impede the crack growth. However, this phenomenon was indistinguishable at σmax = 410 MPa.


Small fatigue crack Machining-induced residual stress Crack growth Ni superalloy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie, Propagation of short fatigue cracks, International Metals Reviews, 29 (6) (1984) 445–475.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. J. Miller, The behavior of short fatigue cracks and their initiation Part II–a general summary, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 10 (2) (1987) 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. Okazaki, H. Yamada and S. Nohmi, Temperature dependence of the intrinsic small fatigue crack growth behavior in Ni–base superalloys based on measurement of crack closure, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 27A (4) (1996) 1021–1031.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Jiang, N. Karpasitis, N. Gao and P. A. S. Reed, Effect of microstructures on fatigue crack initiation and short crack propagation at room temperature in an advanced disc superalloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 641 (8) (2015) 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. D. Sangid, H. J. Maier and H. Sehitoglu, A physically based fatigue model for prediction of crack initiation from persistent slip bands in polycrystals, Acta Materialia, 59 (1) (2011) 328–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. L. McDowell and F. P. E. Dunne, Microstructuresensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation, International J. of Fatigue, 32 (9) (2010) 1521–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    X. R. Wu, J. C. Newman, W. Zhao, M. H. Swain, C. F. Ding and E. P. Phillips, Small crack growth and fatigue life predictions for high–strength aluminum alloys: Part I–experimental and fracture mechanics analysis, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 21 (11) (1998) 1289–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Suresh, Fatigue of materials, Cambridge University Press, London, UK (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Thomas, M. El–Wahabi, J. M. Cabrera and J. M. Prado, High temperature deformation of Inconel 718, J. of Materials Processing Technology, 177 (1) (2006) 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    N. Späth, V. Zerrouki, P. Poubanne and J. Y. Guedou, 718 superalloy forging simulation: a way to improve process and material potentialities, Superalloys 718, 625, 706 and Various Derivatives, TMS, Warrendale (2001) 173–183.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    F. Alexandre, S. Deyber and A. Pineau, Modelling the optimum grain size on the low cycle fatigue life of a Ni based superalloy in the presence of two possible crack initiation sites, Scripta Materialia, 50 (1) (2004) 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Goto, T. Yamomoto, N. Kawagoishi and H. Nisitani, Growth behavior of small surface cracks in Inconel 718 superalloy, International Conference on Temperature–Fatigue Interaction, Ninth International Spring Meeting, European Structural Integrity Society, Paris (2002) 237–246.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Connolley, P. A. S. Reed and M. J. Starink, Short crack initiation and growth at 600 °C in notched specimens of Inconel 718, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 340 (1) (2003) 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    X. Y. Huang, H. C. Yu, M. Q. Xu and Y. X. Zhao, Experimental investigation on microcrack initiation process in nickel–based superalloy DAGH4169, International J. of Fatigue, 42 (4) (2012) 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G. J. Deng, S. T. Tu, X. C. Zhang, Q. Q. Wang and C. H. Qin, Grain size effect on the small fatigue crack initiation and growth mechanisms of nickel–based superalloy GH4169, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 134 (2015) 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. H. Qin, X. C. Zhang, S. Ye and S. T. Tu, Grain size effect on multi–scale fatigue crack growth mechanism of Nickel–based alloy GH4169, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 142 (2015) 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    G. J. Deng, S. T. Tu, X. C. Zhang, J. Wang, C. C. Zhang, X. Y. Qian and Y. N. Wang, Small fatigue crack initiation and growth mechanisms of nickel–based superalloy GH4169 at 650 °C in air, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 153 (2016) 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Javidi, U. Rieger and W. Eichlseder, The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life, International J. of Fatigue, 30 (10) (2008) 2050–2055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. M. Abrao and D. K. Aspinwall, The surface integrity of turned and ground hardener bearing steel, Wear, 196 (1) (1996) 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. W. Schwach and Y. B. Guo, A fundamental study on the impact of surface integrity by hard turning on rolling contact fatigue, International J. of Fatigue, 28 (12) (2006) 1838–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    S. Smith, S. N. Melkote, E. Lara–Curzio, T. R. Watkins, L. Allard and L. Riester, Effect of surface integrity of hard turned AISI 52100 steel on fatigue performance, Materials Science and Engineering: A, 459 (1) (2007) 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    L. Zhu, Z. R. Wu, X. T. Hu and Y. D. Song, Investigation of small fatigue crack initiation and growth behavior of nickel base superalloy GH4169, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 39 (9) (2016) 1150–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    A. R. C. Sharman, J. I. Hughes and K. Ridgway, An analysis of the residual stresses generated in Inconel 718TM when turning, J. of Materials Processing Technology, 173 (3) (2006) 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Y. K. Gao and X. R. Wu, Experimental investigation and fatigue life prediction for 7475–T7351 aluminum alloy with and without shot peening–induced residual stresses, Acta Materialia, 59 (9) (2011) 3737–3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. B. Jordon, J. D. Bernard and J. C. Newman, Quantifying microstructurally small fatigue crack growth in an aluminum alloy using a silicon–rubber replica method, International J. of Fatigue, 36 (1) (2012) 206–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    U. Zerbst, M. Madia and D. Hellmann, An analytical fracture mechanics model for estimation of S–N curves of metallic alloys containing large second phase particles, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 82 (2012) 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    W. Elber, Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2 (1) (1970) 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    K. D. Singh, M. R. Parry and I. Sinclair, A short summary on finite element modelling of fatigue crack closure, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 25 (12) (2011) 3015–3024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Z. W. Gao, K. Y. Lee and Y. H. Zhou, Crack tip shielding and anti–shielding effects of parallel cracks for a superconductor slab under an electromagnetic force, J. of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26 (2) (2012) 353–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    R. Strubbia, S. Hereñú, A. Giertler, I. Alvarez–Armas and U. Krupp, Experimental characterization of short crack nucleation and growth during cycling in lean duplex stainless steels, International J. of Fatigue, 65 (2014) 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    U. Krupp and I. Alvarez–Armas, Short fatigue crack propagation during low–cycle, high cycle and very–high–cycle fatigue of duplex steel–An unified approach, International J. of Fatigue, 65 (2014) 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. C. Newman, The merging of fatigue and fracture mechanics concepts: A historical perspective, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 34 (5) (1998) 347–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    L. Zhang and X. R. Wu, Fatigue life prediction method based on small crack theory in GH4169 superalloy, J. of Aeronautical Materials, 34 (6) (2014) 75–83.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    C. J. Lammi and D. A. Lados, Effects of residual stresses on fatigue crack growth behavior of structural materials: Analytical corrections, International J. of Fatigue, 33 (7) (2011) 858–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. E. LaRue and S. R. Daniewicz, Predicting the effect of residual stress on fatigue crack growth, International J. of Fatigue, 29 (3) (2007) 508–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    J. Schijve, Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art, International J. of Fatigue, 25 (8) (2003) 679–702.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Y. S. Hong, Y. Qiao, N. Liu and X. Zheng, Effect of grain size on collective damage of short cracks and fatigue life estimation for a stainless steel, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 21 (11) (1998) 1317–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Zhu
    • 1
  • Zhirong Wu
    • 1
  • Xuteng Hu
    • 1
  • Yingdong Song
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Aerospace Power System, College of Energy and Power EngineeringNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical StructuresNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations