Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 32, Issue 7, pp 3161–3167 | Cite as

Investigation of low velocity impact behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites

  • Tolga Topkaya
  • Murat Yavuz SolmazEmail author


Honeycomb sandwich composites are used as significant structural members in advanced engineering applications. Thus, it is critical to determine how they behave under impact loading, in addition to other loads. In this study, low velocity impact loading behaviors of honeycomb sandwich composites were experimentally investigated. Almost all of the design parameters of honeycomb sandwich composites were investigated. The results indicated that the core thickness of honeycomb had no effect on the strength of the composite, and the parameter influencing the impact behavior of the specimen the most was the face sheet thickness. When the face sheet thickness of the specimen was increased, the most apparent strength increase was observed in the models using carbon fiber-reinforced composite face sheets. For all face sheet types subject to impact energy of 10 Joules, the upper face sheets of 0.5 mm-thick specimens were perforated.


Honeycomb sandwich composites Low velocity impact CFRP 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    S. Belouettar, A. Abbadi, Z. Azari, R. Belouettar and P. Freres, Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests, Compos. Struct., 87 (3) (2009) 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. H. Yoon, Y. W. Kwon and L. A. Clawson, Experimental investigation on low energy impact behavior of foam cored sandwich composites, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 11 (2) (1997) 136–142.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Q. He, W. Tang, J. Zhang and X. Wang, Effects of concentrated rigid inclusions defects on the in-plane impact behavior of hexagonal honeycombs, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 31 (10) (2017) 4691–4701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    H. Yin, G. Wen, S. Hou and Q. Qing, Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of functionally lateral graded foamfilled tubes, Mater. Des., 44 (2013) 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. J. Herup and A. N. Palazotto, Low-velocity impact damage initiation in graphite/epoxy/Nomex honeycombsandwich plates, Compos. Sci. Technol., 57 (12) (1998) 1581–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Y. Tan and H. M. Akil, Impact response of fiber metal laminate sandwich composite structure with polypropylene honeycomb core, Compos Part B-Eng., 43 (3) (2012) 1433–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Akatay, M. Ö. Bora, O. Çoban, S. Fidan and V. Tuna, The influence of low velocity repeated impacts on residual compressive properties of honeycomb sandwich structures, Compos Struct., 125 (2015) 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    P. M. Schubel, J. J. Luo and I. M. Daniel, Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels, Compos Part A-Appl S, 38 (3) (2007) 1051–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. A. Galehdari, M. Kadkhodayan and S. Hadidi-Moud, Low velocity impact and quasi-static in-plane loading on a graded honeycomb structure; experimental, analytical and numerical study, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 47 (2015) 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. O. Baba, Curved sandwich composites with layer-wise graded cores under impact loads, Compos. Struct., 159 (2017) 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Y. M. Jen, C. W. Ko and H. B. Lin, Effect of the amount of adhesive on the bending fatigue strength of adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb sandwich beams, Int. J. Fatigue, 31 (3) (2009) 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Gunes and K. Arslan, Development of numerical realis-tic model for predicting low-velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich structures, J. Sandw. Struct. Mater., 18 (1) (2016) 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. S. Sharma, V. P. Raghupathy and G. M. Priyamvada, Investigation of low velocity impact response of aluminium honeycomb sandwich panels, APRN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 6 (2011) 7–14.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. K. Paik, A. K. Thayamballi and G. S. Kim, The strength characteristics of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels, Thin Wall Struct., 35 (3) (1999) 205–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Mohammadiha and H. Beheshti, Optimization of functionally graded foam filled conical tubes under axial impact loading, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 28 (5) (2014) 1741–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentBatman UniversityBatmanTurkey
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentFırat UniversityElazığTurkey

Personalised recommendations