Advertisement

Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 1897–1905 | Cite as

Using inlet guide vane to improve load following ability of solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid cycle

  • M. Boroumand
  • A. M. TousiEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

High efficiency and high reliability with low emission of solid oxide fuel cell make them one of the best choices for distributed generation systems. Furthermore, the gas turbine power generation systems are completely developed in recent decades. Hybrid cycle of SOFC and gas turbine gathers these points and introduces the highest possible efficient system for building heating and power. The behavior of this cycle can be studied from a model of fuel cell, gas turbine and balance of plant. For each component a model is developed and the performance of the overall system analyzed by integrating each model. Load variation for SOFC-GT hybrid cycle in residential application is very wide. To adjust the net power and choosing best operation point for SOFC-GT hybrid cycle, an inlet guide vane (IGV) is used in the inlet of the compressor. In this study by using a dynamic model, transient effect of IGV angle on performance of SOFC-GT hybrid cycle is investigated. Also this model can be used for designing a controller for safe operation of this cycle while satisfying constraints of the hybrid cycle. Results showed that by using IGV, the off-design performance of the SOFC-GT cycle is enhanced.

Keywords

Gas turbine Inlet guide vane Load following Solid oxide fuel cell Transient operation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T.-D. Chung et al., Efficiency analyses of solid oxide fuel cell power plant systems, Applied Thermal Engineering, 28(8–9) (2008) 933–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Thijssen, US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, and RDS, Report Number: R10204 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. A. Shaneb et al., Sizing of residential μCHP systems, Energy and Buildings, 43(8) (2011) 1991–2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Pfeiffer et al., Energy and building technology for the 2000 W society-Potential of residential buildings in Switzerland, Energy and Buildings, 37(11) (2005) 1158–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Elmer et al., Emission and economic performance assessment of a solid oxide fuel cell micro-combined heat and power system in a domestic building, Applied Thermal Engineering, 90 (2015) 1082–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. L. Willis and W. G. Scott, Distributed Power Generation: Planning and Evaluation, CRC Press (2014).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. C. Patel et al., Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell gas turbine systems operating with various biofuels, Fuel Cells, 12(6) (2012) 1115–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. P. Harvey and H. J. Richter, As turbine cycles with solid oxide fuel cells —Part I: Improved gas turbine power plant efficiency by use of recycled exhaust gases and fuel cell technology, ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol., 116(4) (1994) 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. P. Harvey and H. J. Richter, Gas turbine cycles with solid oxide fuel cells —Part II: A detailed study of a gas turbine cycle with an integrated internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell, Jourl of Energy Resources Technology, 116 (1994) 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. Facchinetti et al., Design and optimization of an innovative solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid cycle for small scale distributed generation, Fuel Cells, 14(4) (2014) 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Toonssen et al., System study on hydrothermal gasification combined with a hybrid solid oxide fuel cell gas turbine, Fuel Cells, 10(4) (2010) 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Zhao et al., The development and application of a novel optimisation strategy for solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid cycles, Fuel Cells, 10(1) (2010) 181–193.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E. Facchinetti et al., Design and optimization of an innovative solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid cycle for small scale distributed generation, Fuel Cells, 14(4) (2014) 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    X. Lv et al., Determination of safe operation zone for an intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid system, Energy, 99 (2016) 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S. H. Chan et al., Modeling for part-load operation of solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine hybrid power plant, Journal of Power Sources, 114 (2003) 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Stiller et al., Control strategy for a solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid system, Journal of Power Sources, 158(1) (2006) 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. Milewski et al., Off-design analysis of SOFC hybrid system, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (2007) 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. Mueller et al., Synergistic integration of a gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell for improved transient capability, Journal of Power Sources, 176(1) (2008) 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. A. Roberts et al., Fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system control for daily load profile and ambient condition variation, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 132(1) (2010) 012302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S.-R. Oh and J. Sun, Optimization and load-following characteristics of 5kw-class tubular solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid systems, American Control Conference (ACC) (2010).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    X.-J. Wu and X.-J. Zhu, Multi-loop control strategy of a solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system, Journal of Power Sources, 196(20) (2011) 8444–8449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    L. Barelli et al., Part load operation of a SOFC/GT hybrid system: Dynamic analysis, Applied Energy, 110 (2013) 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Y. Komatsu et al., Numerical analysis on dynamic behavior of solid oxide fuel cell with power output control scheme, Journal of Power Sources, 223 (2013) 232–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    S.-R. Oh et al., Dynamic characteristics and fast load following of 5-kW class tubular solid oxide fuel cell/micro-gas turbine hybrid systems, International Journal of Energy Research, 37(10) (2013) 1242–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. Kurzke, How to get component maps for aircraft gas turbine performance calculations, ASME Turbo Expo (2006).Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    L. E. Wallner and R. J. Lubick, Steady state and surge characteristics of a compressor equipped with variable inlet guide vanes operating in a turbojet engine, NACA RM-E54I28 (1955).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    M. Coppinger, Aerodynamic performance of an industrial centrifugal compressor variable inlet guide vane system, Doctoral Thesis, Loughborough University (1999).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    I. Kassens and M. Rautenberg, Flow measurements behind the inlet guide vane of a centrifugal compressor, ASME Paper No. 98-GT-86 (1998).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Y. H. Ho and B. Lakshminarayana, Computation of three-dimensional steady and unsteady flow through a compressor stage, ASME Paper 96-GT-70 (1996).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    C. Stiller, Design, operation and control modelling of SOFC/GT hybrid systems, Ph.D Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (2006) 310.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    V. Liso et al., Solid oxide fuel cell performance comparison fueled by methane, MeOH, EtOH and gasoline surrogate C8H18, Applied Thermal Engineering, 99 (2016) 1101–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. W. Kim, A. V. Virkar, K. Z. Fung, K. Mehta and S. C. Singhal, Polarization effects in intermediate temperature, anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 146 (1999) 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. Larminie and A. Dicks, Fuel Cell Systems Explained, Wiley (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    P.-W. Li and M. K. Chyu, Simulation of the chemical/electrochemical reactions and heat/mass transfer for a tubular SOFC in a stack, Journal of Power Sources, 124 (2003) 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. Xu and G. F. Froment, Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics, AIChE Journal, 35(1) (1989) 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    T. Aloui and K. Halouani, Analytical modeling of polarizations in a solid oxide fuel cell using biomass syngas product as fuel, Applied Thermal Eng., 27(4) (2007) 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Y. Qi, B. Huang and J. Luo, 1-D dynamic modeling of SOFC with analytical solution for reacting gas-flow problem, AIChE Journal, 54 (2008) 1537–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    X. Xue et al., Dynamic modeling of single tubular SOFC combining heat/mass transfer and electrochemical reaction effects, Journal of Power Sources, 142 (2005) 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    S. H. Chan et al., Energy and exergy analysis of simple solid-oxide fuel-cell power systems, Journal of Power Sources, 103 (2002) 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    S. Nagata et al., Numerical analysis of output characteristics of tubular SOFC with internal reformer, Journal of Power Sources, 101 (2001) 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    I. V. Derevich et al., Calculation of the reforming of oil gas by minimizing the gibbs free energy, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 40 (2006) 183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    C. Stiller et al., Finite-volume modeling and hybrid-cycle performance of planar and tubular solid oxide fuel cells, Journal of Power Sources, 141(2) (2005) 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    J. Jia et al., Effect of operation parameters on performance of tubular solid oxide fuel cell, AIChE Journal, 54(2) (2008) 554–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    S. Campanari and P. Iora, Definition and sensitivity analysis of a finite volume SOFC model for a tubular cell geometry, Journal of Power Sources, 132(1–2) (2004) 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    P.-W. Li and M. K. Chyu, Simulation of the chemical/electrochemical reactions and heat/mass transfer for a tubular SOFC in a stack, Journal of Power Sources, 124(2) (2003) 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    A. Hirano et al., Evaluation of a new solid oxide fuel cell system by non-isothermal modeling, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 139(10) (1992) 2744–2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    R. Suwanwarangkul et al., Modelling of a cathode-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cell operating with biomass-derived synthesis gas, Journal of Power Sources, 166(2) (2007) 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    R. Kandepu et al., Modeling and control of a SOFC-GT-based autonomous power system, Energy, 32(4) (2007) 406–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    R. Suwanwarangkul et al., Mechanistic modelling of a cathode-supported tubular solid oxide fuel cell, Journal of Power Sources, 154(1) (2006) 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    P.-W. Li and K. Suzuki, Numerical modeling and performance study of a tubular SOFC, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 151(4) (2004) A548–A557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    D. V. Demidov et al., Gibbs free energy minimization as a way to optimize the combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 5941–5950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSME & Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations