Advertisement

A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization

  • 362 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

This study proposes a weight reduction design approach for urban transit carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. First, the material selection method, which uses specific stiffness and strength indices to predict the weight reduction rate, is set up when the materials of the under-frame and roof structure are substituted. The CFRP was chosen as the best weight reduction material in terms of the material selection method but was not appropriate for application to an urban transit carbody as a thin panel because of out-of-plane deformation. Therefore, we applied CFRP-AL honeycomb sandwich composites to the under-frame and roof structures, and the size optimization method was subsequently applied to derive a lightweight composite hybrid carbody design. Finally, the proposed approach was applied to an urban transit carbody, i.e., a Korean electrical multiple units carbody made of aluminum extrusion profiles. The weight of the optimized composite hybrid carbody design was 29.0% lighter than that of the original K-EMU. The resulting composite hybrid carbody design satisfied the design guidelines of the Performance test standard for K-EMU according to the corresponding FE simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. [1]

    J. J. Carruthers, M. Calomfirescu, P. Ghys and J. Prockat, The application of a systematic approach to material selection for the lightweighting of metro vehicles, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 223 (5) (2009) 427–437.

  2. [2]

    S. I. Seo, J. S. Kim and S. H. Cho, Development of a hybrid composite bodyshell for tilting trains, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 222 (1) (2008) 1–13.

  3. [3]

    A. M. Harte, J. F. McNamara and I. D. Roddy, A multilevel approach to the optimisation of a composite light rail vehicle bodyshell, Composite Structure, 63 (3) (2004) 447–453.

  4. [4]

    J. S. Kim and W. G. Lee, Manufacturing and structural behavior evaluation of composite side beams using autoclave curing and resin transfer moulding method, International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13 (5) (2012) 723–730.

  5. [5]

    M. F. Ashby, Materials selection in mechanical design, Butterworth-Heinemann, OXFORD (2010).

  6. [6]

    S. W. Han and H. S. Jung, Weight reducing of aluminum extrusion profiles of a railway-car body based on topology and size optimization, Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. A, 35 (2) (2011) 213–221.

  7. [7]

    H. A. Lee, S. B. Jung, H. H. Jang, D. H. Shin, J. U. Lee, K. W. Kim and G. J. Park, Structural-optimization-based design process for the body of a railway vehicle made from extruded aluminum panels, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Doi:10.1177/0954409715593971 (2015).

  8. [8]

    D. Wennberg, S. Stichel and P. Wennberg, Substitution of corrugated sheets in a railway vehicle’s body structure by a multiple-requirement based selection process, Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228 (2) (2014) 143–157.

  9. [9]

    Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Performance Test Standard for Electrical Multiple Unit, Promulgation No. 22 (1998).

  10. [10]

    J. S. Arora, Introduction to optimum design, Academic Press (2004).

  11. [11]

    Optimization, Altair Engineering Inc. (2011).

  12. [12]

    P. Sirisalee, M. F. Ashby, G. T. Parks and P. J. Clarkson, Multi-criteria material selection in engineering design, Advanced Engineering Materials, 6 (1) (2004) 84–92.

  13. [13]

    J. G. Cho, J. S. Koo and H. S. Jung, Study on weight reduction of urban transit carbody based on material changes and structural optimization, Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng., 37 (9) (2013) 1101–1109.

  14. [14]

    J. G. Cho, J. S. Koo and H. S. Jung, A material selection method for a hybrid box-type bodyshell with cut-outs using an equivalent bodyshell model without cut-outs, Journal of Composite Materials, 48 (14) (2014) 1767–1785.

  15. [15]

    H. J. Jang, K. B. Shin, H. Y. Ko and T. H. Ko, A study on the standardized finite element models for carbody structures of railway vehicle made of sandwich composites, The Korea Society for Railway, 13 (4) (2010) 382–388.

  16. [16]

    S. W. Tsai and E. M. Wu, A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials, Journal of Composite Materials, 5 (1) (1971) 58–80.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Jeong Seo Koo.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Jin Weon Kim

Koo Jeong-Seo received his M.S. and Doctor Degrees in mechanical engineering from KAIST, Korea, in 1987 and 1995, respectively. Now he is a professor in graduate school of railway, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Korea. He is interested in the areas of crash safety & vehicle structural mechanics and so on.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, J.G., Koo, J.S. & Jung, H.S. A lightweight design approach for an EMU carbody using a material selection method and size optimization. J Mech Sci Technol 30, 673–681 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0123-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urban transit
  • Material selection method
  • Size optimization
  • CFRP sandwich composite
  • Composite hybrid carbody