Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 2565–2571 | Cite as

Investigation on the effect of hematocrit on unsteady hemodynamic characteristics in arteriovenous graft using the multiphase blood model

  • Yong Ki Choi
  • Hyun ju Shin
  • Ji Tae Kim
  • Hong Sun Ryou
Article

Abstract

The hematocrit is increased during hemodialysis and a stenosis is associated with the critical range of hemodynamic characteristics that are affected by the hematocrit. However, the effect of hematocrit on unsteady hemodynamic characteristics during hemodialysis is still unclear. Hence, a numerical research is performed on the effect of hematocrit on unsteady hemodynamic characteristics using a multiphase blood model during one cardiac cycle. The effect of hematocrit appears clearly on high wall shear stress (HWSS) at the floor of the vein vessel. At the peak systole velocity, the HWSS varies from about 1% to 2% when the hematocrit varies by about 1%. At the end distal velocity, the HWSS varies by about 1% when hematocrit varies by 1%. On the other hand, the hematocrit has a very small effect on HWSS at the top of vein anastomosis. Also, these effects of hematocrit are the same on low wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index. Consequently, the variation of hematocrit at the floor of the vein anastomosis should be considered before other anastomosis regions at peak systole velocity.

Keywords

Hematocrit Unsteady blood flow Multiphase blood model Hemodynamic characteristics CFD Arteriovenous graft Stenosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (Great Britain), and Royal College of Physicians, Chronic kidney disease: national clinical guideline for early identification and management in adults in primary and secondary care, Royal College of Physicians (2008).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. D. Woods, M. N. Turenne, R. L. Strawderman, E. W. Young, R. A. Hirth, F. K. Port and P. J. Held, Vascular access survival among incident hemodialysis patients in the United States, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 30 (1) (1997) 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. P. Archie Jr, S. Hyun, C. Kleinstreuer, P. W. Long-est, G. A. Truskey and J. R. Buchanan, Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels, Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering, 29 (1) (2001).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. V. Tricht, D. D. Wachter, J. Tordoir and P. Ver-donck, Comparison of the hemodynamics in 6 mm and 4-7 mm hemodialysis grafts by means of CFD, Journal of Biomechanics, 39 (2) (2006) 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J. D. Hellums and R. A. Hardwick, Response of platelets to shear stress-a review, The Rheology of Blood, Blood Vessels and Associated Tissues, Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Leiden (1981) 160–183.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. F. Donald, Certain histological and chemical responses of the vascular interface to acutely induced mechanical stress in the aorta of the dog, Circulation Research, 24 (1) (1969) 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. M. C. Pereira, J. S. Moura, A. R. Ervilha and J. C. F. Pereira, On the uncertainty quantification of blood flow viscosity models, Chemical Engineering Science, 101 (2013) 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. E. Wells Jr and W. M. Edward, Influence of flow properties of blood upon viscosity-hematocrit relationships, Journal of Clinical Investigation, 41 (8) (1962) 1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. H. Lee, A study on the measurement of blood viscosity for hemorheological analysis of blood flow, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of The 3rd medicine Professional Graduate school of Oriental Medicine Won kwang University (2009).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Jung and H. Ahmed, Three-phase CFD analytical modeling of blood flow, Medical Engineering & Physics, 30 (1) (2008) 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. T. Kim, H. S. Kun and S. R. Hong, A numerical study on the effect of hematocrit on hemodynamic characteristics in arteriovenous graft, Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, 26 (3) (2014) 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. P. Glor, Q. Long, A. D. Hughes, A. D. Augst, B. Ariff, S. M. Thom and X. Y. Xu, Reproducibility study of magnetic resonance image-based computational fluid dynamics prediction of carotid bifurcation flow, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 31 (2) (2003) 142–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Y. Taniyama and K. G. Kathy, Reactive oxygen species in the vasculature molecular and cellular mechanisms, Hypertension, 42 (6) (2003) 1075–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Ki Choi
    • 1
  • Hyun ju Shin
    • 1
  • Ji Tae Kim
    • 1
  • Hong Sun Ryou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChung-ang UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations