Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 29, Issue 7, pp 2579–2585 | Cite as

Order reduction in time integration caused by velocity projection

Article

Abstract

Holonomic constraints restrict the configuration of a multibody system to a subset of the configuration space. They imply so called hidden constraints at the level of velocity coordinates that may formally be obtained from time derivatives of the original holonomic constraints. A numerical solution that satisfies hidden constraints as well as the original constraint equations may be obtained considering both types of constraints simultaneously in each time step (Stabilized index-2 formulation) or using projection techniques. Both approaches are well established in the time integration of differential-algebraic equations. Recently, we have introduced a generalized-α Lie group time integration method for the stabilized index-2 formulation that achieves second order convergence for all solution components. In the present paper, we show that a separate velocity projection would be less favourable since it may result in an order reduction and in large transient errors after each projection step. This undesired numerical behaviour is analysed by a one-step error recursion that considers the coupled error propagation in differential and algebraic solution components. This one-step error recursion has been used before to prove second order convergence for the application of generalized-α methods to constrained systems.

Keywords

Generalized-α method Lie group time integration Velocity projection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M. Arnold, B. Burgermeister, C. Führer, G. Hippmann, and G. Rill, Numerical methods in vehicle system dynamics: State of the art and current developments, Vehicle Syst. Dyn., 49 (7) 2011) 1159–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. Géradin and A. Cardona, Flexible multibody dynamics: A finite element approach, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2001).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. E. Brenan, S. L. Campbell and L. R. Petzold, Numerical solution of initial-value problems in differential-algebraic equations, 2nd ed., SIAM, Philadelphia (1996).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Chung and G. Hulbert, A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-α method, ASME J. of Appl. Mech., 60 (2) 1993) 371–375.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Cardona and M. Géradin, Time integration of the equations of motion in mechanism analysis, Computers and Structures, 33 (3) 1989) 801–820.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Negrut, R. Rampalli, G. Ottarsson and A. Sajdak, On the use of the HHT method in the context of index 3 differential algebraic equations of multi-body dynamics, In J.M. Goicolea, J. Cuadrado, and J.C. García Orden, editors, Proc. of Multibody Dynamics 2005 (ECCOMAS), Madrid, Spain (2005).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. L. Bottasso, O. A. Bauchau and A. Cardona, Time-stepsize-independent conditioning and sensitivity to perturbations in the numerical solution of index three differential algebraic equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 29 (1) 2007) 397–414.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    C. Führer, Differential-algebraische Gleichungssysteme in mechanischen Mehrkörpersystemen, Theorie, numerische Ansätze und Anwendungen, Technical report, TU München (1988).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. W. Gear, B. Leimkuhler and G. K. Gupta, Automatic integration of Euler-Lagrange equations with constraints, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 12&13 (1985) 77–90.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L. O. Jay and D. Negrut, A second order extension of the generalized-a method for constrained systems in mechanics, C. Bottasso, editor, Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods and Applications, Springer, Dordrecht (2008) 143–158.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    C. Lunk and B. Simeon, Solving constrained mechanical systems by the family of Newmark and a-methods, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 86 (10) 2006) 772–784.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Arnold, O. Brüls and A. Cardona, Error analysis of generalized-a Lie group time integration methods for constrained mechanical systems, Numerische Mathematik, 129 (1) 2015) 149–179.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    O. Brüls and A. Cardona, On the use of Lie group time integrators in multibody dynamics, J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam., 5 (3) (2010) 031002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    E. Hairer and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, II. Stiff and Differential-Algebraic Problems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1996).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Brüls, M. Arnold and A. Cardona, Two Lie group formulations for dynamic multibody systems with large rotations, Proceedings of IDETC/MSNDC 2011, ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Washington, USA (2011).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Arnold, O. Brüls and A. Cardona, Improved stability and transient behaviour of generalized-a time integrators for constrained flexible systems, Fifth International Conference on Advanced Computational Methods in ENgineering (ACOMEN 2011), Liège, Belgium, 14-17 November (2011).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    O. Brüls, A. Cardona and M. Arnold, Lie group generalized- a time integration of constrained flexible multibody systems, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 48 (2012) 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    E. Eich, Convergence results for a coordinate projection method applied to mechanical systems with algebraic constraints, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 30 (5) 1993) 1467–1482.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Z. Terze, A. Müller and D. Zlatar, DAE index 1 formulation for multibody system dynamics in Lie-group setting, In P. Eberhard and P. Ziegler, eds., Proc. of The 2nd Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, Stuttgart, Germany, May 29- June 1 (2012).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    J. C. G. Orden, Energy considerations for the stabilization of constrained mechanical systems with velocity projection, Nonlinear Dynamics, 60 (1-2) (2010) 49–62.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Arnold
    • 1
  • Alberto Cardona
    • 2
  • Olivier Brüls
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of MathematicsMartin Luther University, Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
  2. 2.CIMECUniversidad Nacional Litoral - ConicetSanta FeArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (LTAS)University of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations