Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 1629–1640 | Cite as

Hard turning: Parametric optimization using genetic algorithm for rough/finish machining and study of surface morphology

  • Ajay Batish
  • Anirban Bhattacharya
  • Manwinder Kaur
  • Manjot Singh Cheema
Article

Abstract

The present study reports the effect of different process parameters on machining forces, surface roughness, dimensional deviation and material removal rate during hard turning of EN31, SAE8620 and EN9 tool steels. Feed rate followed by hardness, cutting speed and nose radius-depth of cut significantly affected machining forces whereas feed rate had the largest effect on surface roughness. The four responses were subsequently optimized for both rough and finish machining using genetic algorithm to determine the optimum combination of input parameters. Machined surfaces were subsequently analyzed using XRD followed by analysis of grain size and crystallite size of the machined samples and SEM analysis. Higher chromium content was observed at the machined surface as manganese dissolves in cementite and may replace iron atoms in the cementite lattice after machining. High heat is generated when machining at higher cutting speeds causing severe strain. The depth of the white layer decreases with increasing tool nose radius and increases at larger feeds because of greater heat generation. The SEM observations showed a smooth pattern with very low undulations with almost no crack damage.

Keywords

Genetic algorithms Hard turning EN 31 EN 9 SAE 8620 SEM XRD analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    http://www.hardinge.com/usr/pdf/hardturn/ASME.pdf accessed on 20th November (2010).
  2. [2]
    V. N. Gaitonde, S. R. Karnik, L. Figueira and J. P. Davim, Analysis of machinability during hard turning of cold work tool steel (type: AISI D2), Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 24(12) (2009) 1373–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. Singh and P. V. Rao, A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 32 (2007) 1115–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Singh and P. V. Rao, Optimization of tool geometry and cutting parameters for hard turning, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 22(1) (2007) 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    S. Z. Chavoshi and M. Tajdari, Surface roughness modelling in hard turning operation of AISI 4140 using CBN cutting tool, International Journal of Material Forming, 3(4) (2010) 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Y. Zhang and S. Y. Liang, Process optimization of finish turning of hardened steels, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 22(1) (2007) 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Ozel, T. K. Hsu and E. Zeren, Effects of cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, feed rate and cutting speed on surface roughness and forces in finish turning of hardened AISI H13 steel, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25 (2005) 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. Qian and M. R. Hossan, Effect on cutting force in turning hardened tool steels with cubic boron nitride inserts, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 191 (2007) 274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Sieben, T. Wagner and D. Biermann, Empirical modeling of hard turning of AISI 6150 steel using design and analysis of computer experiments, Production Engineering Research Development, 4 (2010) 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Lalwani, N. K. Mehta and P. K. Jain, Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel, Journal of materials processing technology, 206 (2008) 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. A. Yallese, K. Chaoui, N. Zeghib, L. Boulanouar and J. F. Rigal, Hard machining of hardened bearing steel using cubic boron nitride tool, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209 (2009) 1092–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Thamizhmanii, K. Kamarudin, K. Badrul, A. Saparudin and S. Hassan, Study of surface roughness on induction hardened steel using CBN cutting tool, In Proceedings of International Conference on Mechanical & Manufacturing Engineering, Johor Bahru, Malaysia (2008) ISBN: 97-98-2963-59-2.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. A. Yallese, J. F. Rigal, K. Chaoui and L. Boulanour, The effects of cutting conditions on mixed ceramic and cubic boron nitride tool wear and on surface roughness during machining of X200Cr12 steel (60 HRC), Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering, 219(1) (2005) 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    B. Pytlak, Multicriteria optimization of hard turning operation of the hardened 18HGT steel, International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technology, 49 (2010) 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. J. Ross, Taguchi technique for quality engineering, 2ndedn. McGraw Hill, New York (1995).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    D. E. Goldberg, Genetic Algorithm in search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Pearson Education Asia, New Delhi (2003).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Affenzeller, S. Winkler, S. Wagner and A. Beham, Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming, CRC Press, New York (2009).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Math Works inc. http://www.mathworks.com/
  19. [19]
    Y. Lakhtin, Engineering physical metallurgy and heattreatment, 4th printing, Mir Publishers, Moscow (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajay Batish
    • 1
  • Anirban Bhattacharya
    • 1
  • Manwinder Kaur
    • 1
  • Manjot Singh Cheema
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations