Magnetic torque maximization in a camera shutter module by the topology optimization
- 162 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a stronger demand for the weight reduction of components of various portable electronic devices. This work is motivated by the need to reduce the weight of a camera shutter module without much decreasing the torque generated by its magnetic circuit. Because the camera shutter speed is most significantly affected by the torque, the magnitude of the generated torque should also be considered in the design for the weight reduction. Thus, we formulate the design problem as a torque maximization problem under various mass constraints. Specifically, we propose to formulate it as a topology optimization problem of magnetic circuits and find optimal shapes of yokes (and magnets) in the circuits. For the maximization formulation, the objective function is chosen as the average of clockwise and counterclockwise torques over a whole range of rotation angles of a magnet corresponding to the shutter opening angle. Limits on the mass of the yoke and magnet in a magnetic circuit are imposed as constraints. The torque generated by a magnetic circuit is calculated by the modified Maxwell stress tensor method. A series of mass constraint ratios is considered to investigate the effects of the mass usage on the magnitude of torque generated by optimized circuits. The region occupied by the yoke (and the magnet) is designated as a design domain, while coils are assumed to belong to a non-design domain. By demonstrating that the optimized magnetic circuits outperform a nominal circuit, the use of the average torque as an objective function including a corresponding treatment of a rotating magnet proposed in this work is shown to be effective for the topology optimization of magnetic circuits in a camera shutter module.
Keywords
Camera shutter module Magnetic torque maximization Topology optimization Weight reductionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]J. Jung, K. T. Lee, M. H. Lee, S. Hong and E. Ko, Camera module actuator and electromechanical shutter for mobile phone, Proc. of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering Annual Autumn Conference (2005) 740–743.Google Scholar
- [2]D. N. Dyck and D. A. Lowther, Automated design of magnetic devices by optimizing material distribution, IEEE Trans. Magn., 32 (1996) 1188–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]W. Kim and Y. Y. Kim, Design of a bias magnetic system of a magnetostrictive sensor for flexural wave measurement, IEEE Trans. Magn., 40 (2004) 3331–3338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]W. Kim, J. E. Kim and Y. Y. Kim, Coil configuration design for the Lorentz force maximization by the topology optimization method: applications to optical pickup coil design, Sens. Actuators A-Phys., 121 (2005) 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]J. Yoo, Reduction of vibration caused by magnetic force in a switched reluctance motor by topology optimization, J. Appl. Mech., 69 (2002) 380–387.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]J. Byun and S. Hahn, Application of topology optimization to electromagnetic system, Int. J. Appl. Electrom. Mech., 13 (2001) 25–33.Google Scholar
- [7]S. Wang, J. Kang and J. Noh, Topology optimization of a single-phase induction motor for rotary compressor, IEEE Trans. Magn., 40 (2004) 1591–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]S. Wang, D. Youn, H. Moon and J. Kang, Topology optimization of electromagnetic systems considering magnetization direction, IEEE Trans. Magn., 41 (2005) 1808–1811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]L. Chang, A. R. Eastham and G. E. Dawson, Permanent magnet synchronous motor: finite element torque calculations, Proc. of IEEE IAS Annu. Meeting, 1 (1989) 69–73.Google Scholar
- [10]S. J. Salon, Finite Element Analysis of Electrical Machines, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York (1995) 35–39.Google Scholar
- [11]E. S. Hamdi, Design of Small Electrical Machines, Wiley, New York (1994).Google Scholar
- [12]M. P. Bendsøe and O. Sigmund, Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization, Arch. Appl. Mech., 69 (1999) 635–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]K. K. Choi and N. Kim, Structural Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization 1: Linear Systems, Springer, New York (2004).Google Scholar
- [14]K. Svanberg, The method of moving asymptotes: a new model for structural optimization, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 24 (1987) 359–373.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar