Comparison study on the accuracy of metamodeling technique for non-convex functions
- First Online:
- 222 Downloads
In order to increase the efficiency of design optimization, many efforts have been made on studying the metamodel techniques for effectively representing expensive and complex models. In this study, a comparison is conducted on the accuracy of several widely used meta-model techniques — moving least squares (MLS), Kriging, support vector regression (SVR) and radial basis functions (RBF) — which are able to approximate non-convex functions well. RMSE (root mean squared error) value is identified as a measure of the accuracy for this comparison. Each metamodel technique is used to approximate the six well-known mathematical functions and a resign of experiment (DOE) is generated by using the Latin hypercube design (LHD), which is also performed for each resulting metamodel. The results show that Kriging and MLS can create a more accurate metamodel than SVR and RBF with the mathematical functions tested.
KeywordsMetamodel Moving least squares Kriging Radial basis function Support vector regression
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.