Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 424–434 | Cite as

Effects of Differences in Mechanical Parameters of Media on Mechanical Properties and Failure Form of Composite Samples

  • Weiqi Wang
  • Yicheng Ye
  • Qihu WangEmail author
  • Xiaoyun Liu
  • Zhouhao Yuan
  • Pengcheng Li
Geotechnical Engineering
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The deformation and failure of composite rock masses at the contact zone can cause serious safety hazards in underground engineering. Therefore, uniaxial compression experiment and numerical studies of composite samples were conducted. Combined with theoretical analysis, the effects of differences in the mechanical properties of two media on the mechanical properties and failure form of composite samples were investigated. The results show that the difference in mechanical properties of two media weakened the strength and elastic modulus of the composite sample and resulted in complex failure form of the sample. Additionally, the peaks of the AE frequencies of the two media occurred successively after the peak stress of the sample. At the macrolevel, the two media failed successively. These effects are more pronounced as the degree of difference in the mechanical properties of the two media increased. The difference in mechanical properties of the two media resulted in uncoordinated deformation and constrained stress near the contact interface, and the difference in Poisson’s ratio is the main factor. The influence (enhanced or weakened) of uncoordinated deformation on the mechanical properties of the composite sample is affected by differences in the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratios of the two media.

Keywords

Composite sample Difference in mechanical properties Uncoordinated deformation Constrained stress Acoustic emission 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51574183, No. 51704213), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2017CFC831) and the Wuhan University of Science and Technology 2018 Innovation Fund (No. JCX201855). We also express our gratitude to the members of the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, for their help with the experiments.

References

  1. Ajalloeian R, Moghaddam B, Azimian A (2017) Prediction of rock mass squeezing of T4 tunnel in Iran. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 35(2):747–763, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0139-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amann F, Button EA, Evans KF, Gischig VS, Blumel M (2011) Experimental study of the brittle behavior of clay shale in rapid unconfined compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 44(4):415–430, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-011-0156-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blenkinsop TG, Doyle MG (2014) Structural controls on gold mineralization on the margin of the Yilgarn craton, albanye fraser orogen: The tropicana deposit, Western Australia. Journal of Structural Geology 67:189–204, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2014.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cawood AJ, Clare EB (2018) 3D mechanical stratigraphy of a deformed multi4ayer: Linking sedimentary architecture and strain partitioning. Journal of Structural Geology 106:54–69, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen YL, Zuo IP, Liu DJ, Wang ZB (2018) Deformation failure characteristics of coal-rock combined body under uniaxial compression: Experimental and numerical investigations. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 78(5):3449–3464, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/S10064-018-1336-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cong Y, Wang ZQ, Dend YR, Feng XT (2015) Experimental study on microscopic parameters of brittle materials based on particle flow theory. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 37(6):1031–1040, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201506009 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Douma LANR, Regelink JA, Bertotti Q, Boersma QD, Barnhoorn A (2019) The mechanical contrast between layers controls fracture containment in layered rocks. Journal of Structural Geology 127:1–11, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2019.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubinya NV, Galybin AN (2018) On stress distribution in layered rock masses. Izvestiya-Physics of the Solid Earth 54(6):904–913, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351318060046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) International society for rock mechanics commission on testing methods: Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress-strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 36:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng WK, Huang RQ, Li TB (2012) Deformation analysis of a soft-hard rock contact zone surrounding a tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 32:190–197, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng G, Kang Y, Sun ZD, Wang XC, Hu YQ (2019) Effects of supercritical C02 adsorption on the mechanical characteristics and failure mechanisms of shale. Energy 173:870–882, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu B, Yang SQ, Xu P, Cheng JL (2019) Cyclic loading-unloading creep behavior of composite layered specimens. Acta Geophysica 67(2):449–464, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/sll600-019-00261-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang WP, Li C, Zhang LW, Yuan Q, Zheng YS, Liu Y (2018) In situ identification of water-permeable fractured zone in overlying composite strata. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 105:85–97, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang BX, Liu JW (2013) The effect of loading rate on the behavior of samples composed of coal and rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 61:23–30, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang CC, Yang WD, Duan K, Fang LD, Wang L, Bo CJ (2019) Mechanical behaviors of the brittle rock-like specimens with multi-nonpersistent joints under uniaxial compression. Construction and Building Materials 220:426–443, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khazaei C, Hazzard J, Chalaturnyk R (2015) Damage quantification of intact rocks using acoustic emission energies recorded during uniaxial compression test and discrete element modeling. Computers and Geotechnics 67:94–102, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krasnovskii AA, Mirenkov VE (2009) Determination of boundary conditions in rocks under compression. Journal of Mining Science 45(4):315–325, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-009-0039-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li YP, Liu W, Yang CH, Daemen JJK (2014) Experimental investigation of mechanical behavior of bedded rock salt containing inclined interlayer. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 69:39–49, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang W, Yang C, Zhao Y, Dusseault MB, Liu J (2007) Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of bedded salt rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 44(3):400–411, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu J, Wang EY, Song DZ, Wang S, Niu Y (2015) Effect of rock strength on failure mode and mechanical behavior of composite samples. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 8(7):4527–4539, DOI:10.1007/sl2517-014-1574-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirenkov VE (2007) Contact problems in rock mechanics. Journal of Mining Science 43(4):370–381, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-007-0036-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirenkov VE (2009) On probable failure of an undercut rock mass. Journal of Mining Science 45(2):105–111, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10913-009-0014-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mu K, Li TB, Yu J, Cai YY, Liu SY, Tu BX, Jiang HC (2014) Mesoscopic simulation of relationship of acoustic emission and compressive deformation behaviour in sandstone under confining pressures effect. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 33(z9):2786–2793, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.s1.028 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Sheng JL, Huang T, Ye ZY, Hu B, Liu YN, Fan QL (2019) Evaluation of van Genuchten-Mualem model on the relative permeability for unsaturated flow in aperture-based fractures. Journal of Hydrology 576:315–324, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang AM, Li XG, Yang CH, Huang ZQ (2010) Study of interaction between creep deformation of bedded salt rock. Rock and Soil Mechanics 31(12):3964–3970, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2010.12.006 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Wang AM, Yang CH, Huang C, Li YP (2009) Numerical experiment study of deformation and mechanical properties of layered salt rock. Rock and Soil Mechanics 30(7):2173–2178, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.16285/jjsm.2009.07.021 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Xiao LL, Liu FL, Xie YL, Wu CM (2014) Precambrian metamorphic evolution and its tectonic implications of the Zuoquan metamorphic complex. Acta Petrologica Sinica 30(10):2925–2940 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Xiong LX, Li TB, Yang LD (2014) Biaxial compression creep test on green-schist considering the effects of water content and anisotropy. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18(1):103–112, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0276-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yassaghi A, Salari- Rad H (2005) Squeezing rock conditions at an igneous contact zone in the Taloun tunnels, Tehran-Shomal freeway, Iran: A case study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 42(1):95–108, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang GH, Jiao YY, Ma CX, Wang H, Chen LB, Tang ZC (2018) Alteration characteristics of granite contact zone and treatment measures for inrush hazards during tunnel construction - A case study. Engineering Geology 235:64–80, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao JS, Feng XT, Jiang Q, Zhou YY (2018) Microseismicity monitoring and failure mechanism analysis of rock masses with weak interlayer zone in underground intersecting chambers: A case study from the Baihetan Hydropower Station, China. Engineering Geology 245:44–60, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao ZH, Wang WM, Dai CQ, Yan JX (2014) Failure characteristics of three-body model composed of rock and coal with different strength and stiffness. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 24(5):1538–1546, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63223-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu C, Tao Z, Yang S, Zhao S (2019) V shaped gully method for controlling rockfall on high-steep slopes in China. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 78(4):2731–2747, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1269-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuo JP, Chen Y, Zhang JW, Wang JT, Sun YJ, Jiang GH (2016) Failure behavior and strength characteristics of coal-rock combined body under different confining pressures. Journal of China Coal Society 41(11):2706–2713, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.0456 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. Zuo JP, Wang ZF, Zhou HW, Pei JL, Liu JF (2013) Failure behavior of a rock-coal-rock combined body with a weak coal interlayer. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 23(6):907–912, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weiqi Wang
    • 1
  • Yicheng Ye
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qihu Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaoyun Liu
    • 1
  • Zhouhao Yuan
    • 1
  • Pengcheng Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Resources and Environmental EngineeringWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Industrial Safety Engineering Technology Research Center of Hubei ProvinceWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations