Measure for Reducing the Tensile Stress in Cement-Treated Soil Layer in Deep Excavation in Soft Clay
- 12 Downloads
Cement-stabilised soil layers (CSSLs) are often created to enhance lateral support to the retaining wall below the excavation level, such as those widely used in the construction of common service tunnels in Singapore. The CSSLs may be subjected to tensile stress or even cracks due to the underlying uplift pressure. Fully-coupled effective stress analyses were carried out using ABAQUS to explore the effectiveness of three measures for reducing the upheave-induced hogging of the CSSLs, i.e., increasing the thickness, usage of pressure-relief wells and usage of openings in the CSSLs. The results show that the usage of the opening is a more effective and more widely applicable measure compared to the other two measures.
Keywordsground improvement opening excavation tension uplift
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This study is part of a research project funded by the Land Transport Authority (LTA) of Singapore on the optimisation of earth retaining stabilizing structures for deep excavations. The support of LTA is gratefully acknowledged. The first Author would also like to acknowledge for the support of the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (Project No. 20180550716) and the China Scholarship Council, which funded her study and attachment to the National University of Singapore. The second author would like to acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51879203).
- Arroyo, M., Ciantia, M., Castellanza, R., Gens, A., and Nova, R. (2012). “Simulation of cement-improved clay structures with a bonded elasto-plastic model: A practical approach.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 45, pp. 140–150, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goh, T. L. (2003). Stabilization of an excavation by an embedded improved soil layer, PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Horpibulsuk, S., Liu, M. D., Liyanapathirana, D. S., and Suebsuk, J. (2010). “Behaviour of cemented clay simulated via the theoretical framework of the structured cam clay model.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 37, Nos. 1–2, pp. 1–9, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, F. H., Hong, S. H., Gu, Q., and Zhao, P. (2010). “Application of large three-dimensional finite-element analyses to practical problems.” International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 529–539, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, F. H., Lee, Y., Chew, S. H., and Yong, K. Y. (2005). “Strength and modulus of marine clay-cement mixes.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 2, pp. 178–186, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(178).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, F. H., Yong, K. Y., Quan, K. C., and Chee, K. T. (1998). “Effect of corners in strutted excavations: Field monitoring and case histories.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 339–349, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:4(339).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li, G. J., Wong, K. S., and Ng, P. B. (2011). “Back analysis of a braced excavation with DCM ground improvement.” Proc. Underground Singapore 2011, Singapore.Google Scholar
- LTA (2010). Land transport authority engineering group civil design criteria for road and rail transit systems, Report No. E/GD/09/106/A1, Singapore.Google Scholar
- McGinn, A. J. (2003). Performance of deep excavations in Boston marine clay stabilized by deep mixing methods, PhD Thesis, Cornell University, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Modoni, G., Flora, A., Lirer, S., Ochmanski, M., and Croce, P. (2016). “Design of jet grouted excavation bottom plugs.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 142, No. 7, 04016018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa, S., Kamegaya, I., Kureha, K., and Yoshida, T. (1996). “Case history and behavioural analyses of braced large scale open excavation in very soft reclaimed land in coastal area.” Proc. The International Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Rotterdam, Netherlands, pp. 179–184.Google Scholar
- Namikawa, T. and Koseki, J. (2012). “Effects of spatial correlation on the compression behavior of a cement-treated column.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 8, pp. 1346–1359, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Rourke, T. D. and McGinn, A. J. (2006). “Lessons learned for ground movements and soil stabilization from the Boston Central Artery.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 8, pp. 966–989, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pan, Y., Liu, Y., and Chen, E. J. (2018a).“Probabilistic investigation on defective jet-grouted cut-off wall with random geometric imperfections.” Géotechnique, pp. 1–49, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.17.P.254.
- Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, J., Sun, M., and Wang, W. (2017). “Probabilistic investigations on the watertightness of jet-grouted ground considering geometric imperfections in diameter and position.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 54, No. 10, pp. 1447–1459, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pan, Y., Liu, Y., Xiao, H., Lee, F. H., and Phoon, K. K. (2018b). “Effect of spatial variability on short-and long-term behaviour of axially-loaded cement-admixed marine clay column.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 94, pp. 150–168, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pittaro, G. A. (2016). “Use of pressure relief wells to check ground improvement tensile strains in deep excavations.” 19th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference & 2nd AGSSEA Conference (19SEAGC & 2AGSSEA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Soh, K. K., Yeo, L., Wa, P. K., T. T., Lim, S. H., and Chua, D. K. H. (2014). “Analysis and behaviour of high cantilever retaining wall in Marine Clay.” Proc. Underground Singapore 2014, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Tan, K. Q. (2016). Stability of headings and plane faces of underground openings in soft clay stabilised by cement treatment, PhD Thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Takenaka, D. and Takenaka, K. (1995). Deep chemical mixing method-using cement as hardening agent, Report No. 046-017129, Takenaka Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
- Tan, T. S., Yong, K. Y, Goh, T. L., and Kongsomboon, T. (2003). “Behaviour of an embedded improved soil layer in an excavation.” Proc. Underground Singapore 2003, Singapore.Google Scholar
- Terashi, M. (1980). Fundamental properties of lime and cement treated soils, Report of PHRI, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 33–62 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- Tyagi, A., Zulkefli, M. F. B., Pan, Y., Goh, S. H., and Lee, F. H. (2017). “Failure modes of tunnels with improved soil surrounds.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 11, p. 04017088, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xiao, H., Lee, F. H., and Liu, Y. (2016). “Bounding surface cam-clay model with cohesion for cement-admixed clay.” International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 17, No. 1, p. 04016026, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, R. J., Hasan, M. S. M., Zheng, J. J., and Cheng, Y. S. (2018). “Effect of spatial variability of engineering properties on stability of a CSMC embankment.” Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 91–99, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1290168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zheng, J. J., Liu, Y., Pan, Y. T., and Hu, J. (2018). “Statistical evaluation of the load-settlement response of a multicolumn composite foundation.” International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 04018015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar