Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 12, pp 5154–5162 | Cite as

Failure Envelopes of Bucket Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines under Combined Loading Including Torsion

  • Si-qi Li
  • Yuan WangEmail author
  • Qing-wen Li
  • Jing-qi Huang
  • Jin-hui Li
Structural Engineering
  • 45 Downloads

Abstract

The loading condition of bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines is very complicated and often under combined loading, but the torsion is always ignored. So, it is necessary to investigate the failure envelopes including torsion of bucket foundations. Under the premise of validating the reliability of the numerical model by comparing with other published data, failure envelopes in each loading space are obtained and the applicability of swipe test for the determination of H-T failure envelope and M-T failure envelope of bucket foundations is explored. The impacts of torsion and aspect ratio on the combined bearing capacities are studied. While revealing the law of impacts, equations are proposed to determine the respective failure envelopes and evaluate the combined bearing capacities. The V-H-M-T failure envelope can reveal the torsion effect on envelope under traditional V-H-M loading, the results show that the normalized V-H-M failure envelopes under different torsions almost coincide, torsion effect can be easily considered according to this characteristic.

Keywords

offshore wind turbine bucket foundation combined loading failure envelope torsion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51679060).

References

  1. Abyaneh, S. D., Ojo, A, Maconochie, A, and Haghighi, A. (2015). “The undrained bearing capacity of shallow foundations subjected to three-dimensional loading including torsion.” Proc. of 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Hawaii, USA, pp. 668–674.Google Scholar
  2. Bienen, B, Gaudin, C, Cassidy, M. J., Rausch, L, Purwana, O. A., and Krisdani, H. (2012). “Numerical modelling of a hybrid skirted foundation under combined loading.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 127–139, DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bransby, M. F. and Randolph, M. F. (1998). “Combined loading of skirted foundations.” Geotechnique, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 637–655, DOI: 10.1680/geot.l998.48.5.637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B, Houlsby, G, Martin, C, and Fish, P. (2002). “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines.” Wind Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 145–155, DOI: 10.1260/030952402762056063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan, Q, Zheng, J, and Ma. S. (2018). “An investigation of failure envelope for skirted foundations in soft clay based on computer-aided analyses.” Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 103, No. 2, pp. 1219- 1228, DOI: 10.1007/sll277-018-5482-2.Google Scholar
  6. Feng, X, Randolph, M. F., Gourvenec, S, and Wallerand, R. (2014). “Design approach for rectangular mudmats under fully three-dimensional loading.” Geotechnique, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 51–63, DOI: 10.1680/geot.l3.p.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gourvenec, S. (2007). “Failure envelopes for offshore shallow foundations under general loading.” Geotechnique, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 715–728, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2007.57.9.715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gourvenec, S. and Randolph, M. (2003). “Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay.” Geotechnique, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 575–586, DOI: 10.1680/geot.53.6.575.37328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houlsby, G. T. and Byrne, B. W. (2000). “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines and anemometer masts.” Wind Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 249–255, DOI: 10.1260/0309524001495611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hung, L. C. and Kim, S. R. (2014). “Evaluation of undrained bearing capacities of bucket foundations under combined loads.” Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 76–92, DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2012.735346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Luke, A. M., Rauch, A. F., Olson, R E., and Mecham, E. C. (2005). “Componenet of suction caisson capacity measured in axial pullout test.” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 37, pp. 878–891, DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mansur, C. I. and Kaufman, J. M. (1956). “Pile tests, low-sill structure, Old River, Louisiana.” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Vol. 82, No. SM5, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, C. (2003). “New software for rigorous bearing capacity calculations.” Proc, Conf, on Foundations: Innovations, Observations, Design and Practice, Thomas Telford, London, UK, pp. 581–592.Google Scholar
  14. Mehravar, M, Harireche, O, and Faramarzi, A. (2016). “Evaluation of undrained failure envelopes of caisson foundations under combined loading.” Applied Ocean Research, Vol. 59, pp. 129–137, DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.05.001.Google Scholar
  15. Shen, Z, Bie, S, and Guo, L. (2017). “Undrained capacity of a surface circular foundation under fully three-dimensional loading.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 92, pp. 57–67, DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017. 07.018.Google Scholar
  16. Skau, K. S., Chen, Y, and Jostad, H. P. (2018). “A numerical study of capacity and stiffness of circular skirted foundations in clay subjected to combined static and cyclic general loading.” Geotechnique, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 205–220, DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.l6.P.092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taiebat, H. A. and Carter, J. P. (2004). “Effects of torsion on caisson capacity in clay.” Proc. of Australia New Zealand Geomechanics Conference, Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 130–136.Google Scholar
  18. Taiebat, H. A. and Carter, J. P. (2005). “Interaction of forces on caissons in undrained soils.” Proc. of 15th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seoul, Korea, pp. 625–632.Google Scholar
  19. Tan, F. S. C. (1990). Centrifuge and theoretical modelling of conical footings on sand, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  20. Vulpe, C. (2015). “Design method for the undrained capacity of skirted circular foundations under combined loading: Effect of deformable soil plug.” Geotechnique, Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 669–683, DOI: 10.1680/geot.l4.p.200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vulpe, C, Gourvenec, S, and Power, M. (2014). “A generalised failure envelope for undrained capacity of circular shallow foundations under general loading.” Geotechnique Letters, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 187–196, DOI: 10.1680/geolett.l4.00010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yun, G. and Bransby, M. F. (2007). “The horizontal-moment capacity of embedded foundations in undrained soil.” Revue Canadienne De Geotechnique, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 409–424, DOI: 10.1139/t06-126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhan, Y. G. and Liu, R. C. (2010). “Numerical analysis of bearing capacity of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbines.” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 76–81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Resources EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.The College of Mechanics and MaterialsHohai UniversityNanjing, JiangsuChina
  3. 3.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations