Advertisement

Effect of Acrylate-Cement Grout on the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Silty Sand

  • Kean-Thai Chhun
  • Su-Hyung Lee
  • Sam-Ang Keo
  • Chan-Young YuneEmail author
Geotechnical Engineering
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Chemical grouting has been widely used to ensure the stability and durability of built structures by enhancing the engineering properties of soils. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a newly developed acrylate-cement grout, composed of component A (acrylic polymer, catalyst, and hardener) and component B (cement) having mixing ratios varying from 0.5% to 2% of the total weight, on the unconfined compressive strength of silty sand. Three series of laboratory tests (gel time, expansion ratio, and unconfined compression strength) were carried out on reconstituted soil samples with a void replacement ratio of 80% and 100% by acrylate-cement grout. The results showed that the optimum cement ratio of the chemical grout was 1.5% based on the unconfined compressive strength and the elastic modulus for the silty sand with grouting.

Keywords

acrylate-cement grout portland cement unconfined compression gel time expansion ratio elastic modulus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajalloeian, R., Matinmanesh, H., Abtahi, S. M., and Rowshanzamir, M. (2013). “Effect of polyvinyl acetate grout injection on geotechnical properties of fine sand”. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 89–96, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2012.705897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akira, M. and Masahito, T. (1986). “Effect of dilatancy on permeability in sands stabilized by chemical grout.” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 96–104, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.26.96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anagnstopoulos, C. A. (2005). “Laboratory study of an injected granular soil with polymer grouts.” Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 523–533, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.04.005.Google Scholar
  4. ASTM D2435-11 (2014). Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soil using incremental loading, D2435-11, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. ASTM D4219-02 (2005). Standard test method for compressive strength index of chemical grouted soils, D4219-02, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Gonzalez, H. and Vipulanandan, C. (2007). “Behavior of a sodium silicate grouted sand.” Proc. Grouting for Ground Improvement: Innovative Concepts and Applications, Geo-Denver 2007, Denver, CO, USA, pp. 1–10, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/40912(231)4.Google Scholar
  7. Inazumi, S., Shang, H. M., Soralump, S., and Nakagishi, Y. (2014). “Effect of the molar ratio of liquid glass grouting agents on mechanical characteristic of the solidified soils.” International Journal of GEOMATE, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 985–992, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.21660/2014.13.140314.Google Scholar
  8. Karol, R. H. (2003). Chemical grouting and soil stabilization, 3rd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203911815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kazemian, S. and Prasad, A. (2012). “Physical properties of cement-sodium silicate grout with kaolinite.” Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Grouting and Deep Mixing, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp. 1701–1710.Google Scholar
  10. Krizek, R. J. and Spino, M. J. (2000). “Spatial and directional variations in engineering properties of an in situ silicate-grouted sand.” Advances in Grouting and Ground Modification, pp. 139–154, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/40516(292)10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mollamahmutoǧlu, M., Avci, E., Tomaç, S. K., and Köse, D. A. (2017). “Performance of novel chemical grout in treating sands.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 04017164–1-12, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ortiz, R. C. (2015). Mechanical behavior of grouted sands, MSc Thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.Google Scholar
  13. Ozgurel, H. G. and Vipulanandan, C. (2005). “Effect of grain size and distribution on permeability and mechanical behavior of acrylamide grouted sand.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp.1457–1465, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1457).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raju, V. R. (2010). “Ground improvement-applications and quality control.” Proc., Indian Geotechnical Conference, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, pp. 121–129.Google Scholar
  15. Sunder, S. (2012). Development and characterization of grouts for sealing and sensing applications, PhD Thesis, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  16. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (1995). Chemical grouting, EM 1110-1-3500, USACE Publications, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  17. Yonekura, R. and Kaga, M. (1992). “Current chemical grout engineering in Japan.” Geotechnical Special Publication, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 725–736.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kean-Thai Chhun
    • 1
  • Su-Hyung Lee
    • 2
  • Sam-Ang Keo
    • 1
  • Chan-Young Yune
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringGangneung-Wonju National UniversityGangneungKorea
  2. 2.Metropolitan Transit System Research CenterKorea Railroad Research InstituteUiwangKorea

Personalised recommendations