Advertisement

Multi-scale Dynamic System Reliability Analysis of Actively-controlled Structures under Random Stationary Ground Motions

  • Seung-Min Kim
  • Seung-Yong OkEmail author
  • Junho Song
Structural Engineering
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a multi-scale dynamic system reliability analysis approach to assess the failure probability of an actively-controlled structure subject to random stationary ground motions. The proposed approach employs a multi-scale hierarchical framework where a lower-scale system reliability analyses compute the failure probabilities of the structural members during the earthquakes and a higher-scale system reliability analysis computes the failure probability of the structural system based on results of the lower-scale analyses. The multi-scale framework facilitates the system reliability analysis of the large-sized complex system by decomposing the complex system into the manageable-sized subsystems. It also enables us to deal with statistical dependence both in spatial and temporal senses through the decomposition of the reliability analysis in space and time aspects. In these regards, the proposed approach performs a reliability analysis with the dynamic responses in time domain. This dynamic reliability analysis approach can consider uncertainties in system parameters and earthquake excitations simultaneously. In addition, the peak response over a time duration is used to describe the limit state of the structural system, which provides a more realistic measure of the failure probability of a structural system than instantaneous probability. In order to demonstrate the proposed approach, a 3-story shear-type building equipped with an optimal active control device is considered. The control performance under uncertainties is investigated through the reliability assessment by the proposed approach and the Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) approach, respectively. The numerical study also investigates the influence of the uncertainties in the system parameters and the earthquake excitations on the system failure probability. The results of the numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed approach can efficiently estimate the system reliability and the failure probability of an actively-controlled structure.

Keywords

dynamic reliability system reliability analysis multi-scale approach active control system uncertainty probabilistic performance assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, W. F. and Laub, A. J. (1984). “Generalized eigenproblem algorithms and software for algebraic Riccati equations.” Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 72, No. 12, pp. 1746–1754, DOI: 10.1109/PROC.1984.13083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burl, J. B. (1998). Linear optimal control: H 2 and H methods, Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Der Kiureghian, A. (2000). “The geometry of random vibrations and solutions by FORM and SORM.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 15, Nos. 1. pp. 81–90, DOI: 10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00011-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Der Kiureghian, A. (2005). “First- and second-order reliability methods.” Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, E. Nikoaidis, D. M. Ghuicel, and S. Singhal, Eds., Chapter 14, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Ditlevsen, O. D. and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, Wiley, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Genz, A. (1992). “Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 141–149, DOI: 10.1080/10618600.1992.10477010.Google Scholar
  7. Haftka, R. T., and Gürdal, Z. (1992). Elements of structural optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Housner, G. W., Bergman, L. A., Caughey, T. K., Chassiakos, A. G., Claus, R. O., Masri, S. F., Skelton, R. E., Soong, T. T., Spencer, B. F. Jr., and Yao, J. T. P. (1997). “Structural control: Past, present, and future.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 123, No. 9, pp. 897–971, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanai, K. (1957). “Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground.” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 309–325.Google Scholar
  10. Kang, W. H. and Song, J. (2010). “Evaluation of multivariate normal integrals for general systems by sequential compounding.” Structural Safety, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 35–41, DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, D. S., Ok, S. Y., Song, J., and Koh, H. M. (2013). “System reliability analysis using dominant failure modes identified by selective searching technique.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 119, pp. 316–331, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, F. L. (1992). Applied optimal control and estimation, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). “The Monte Carlo Method.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 44, No. 247, pp. 335–341, DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Park, K. S. and Park, W. (2012). “Minmax optimum design of active control system for earthquake excited structures.” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 51, pp. 40–48, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roberts, J. B. and Spanos, P. D. (2003). Random vibration and statistical linearization, Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Song, J. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2006). “Joint first-passage probability and reliability of systems under stochastic excitation.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 1, pp. 65–77, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:1(65).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Song, J. and Ok, S. Y. (2010). “Multi-scale system reliability analysis of lifeline networks under earthquake hazards.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 259–279, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.938.Google Scholar
  18. Spencer, B. F. Jr and Nagarajaiah, S. (2003). “State of the art of structural control.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 845–856, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spencer, B. F. Jr, and Sain, M. K. (1997). “Controlling buildings: A new frontier in feedback.” IEEE Control Systems Magazine on Emerging Technology, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 19–35, DOI: 10.1109/37.642972.Google Scholar
  20. Spencer, B. F. Jr, Sain, M. K., Won, C. H., Kaspari, D. C., and Sain, P. M. (1994). “Reliability-based measures of structural control robustness.” Structural Safety, Vol. 15, Nos. 1–2, pp. 111–129, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(94)90055-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tajimi, H. (1960). “A statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake.” Proceeding of 2nd world conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 781–897.Google Scholar
  22. Zembaty, Z., and Rutenberg, A. (2002). “Spatial response spectra and site amplification effects.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 1485–1496, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00096-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Civil, Safety and Environmental EngineeringHankyong National UniversityAnseongKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil and Environmental EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations