Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp 2243–2253 | Cite as

Study on the Vertical Dynamic Coupled Effects of the Crowd-structure System based on the Social Force Model

  • Qiankun ZhuEmail author
  • Xiaoli Hui
  • Nana Nan
  • Yongfeng Du
Structural Engineering
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the complexity and randomness of the crowd motion, it is not easy to establish the crowd-structure coupled governing equation. Therefore, the idea of the solution procedure for the coupled system of the single pedestrian and structure is extended to carry out the research of crowd-structure coupled system. Then based on the social force model and the deceleration mechanism as well as the self-stopped mechanism, the one-way pedestrian flow is simulated. The modified Differential Quadrature-Integral Quadrature (DQ-IQ) mixed method is used to solve the dynamic response of the structure under the moving stiffness-mass-damping model, which can demonstrate this method enjoys higher accuracy than the mode superposition method and can take enough higher modes into consideration. Additionally, the fact that the DQ-IQ mixed method can be used to solve the dynamic response of the structure subjected to the crowd is verified. The final results under random crowd show that the varying tendencies of structural modal parameters respectively changed with the the number of pedestrian acting on the structure, In order to more comprehensively and more scientifically measure the vibration function of the structure, the 1 s-RMS acceleration is introduced to weaken the interference effect of random fluctuation.

Keywords

random crowd social force model DQ-IQ mixed method dynamic response modal parameters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archbold, P., Keogh, J., Caprani, C., and Fanning, P. (2011). “A parametric study of pedestrian vertical force models for dynamic analysis of footbridges.” Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures, Varenna, Italy.Google Scholar
  2. Bellman, R., Kashef, B. G., and Casti, J. (1972). “Differential quadrature: A technique for the rapid solution of nonlinear partial differential equations.” Journal of Computational Physics, Elsevier, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40–52. DOI: 10.1016/0021–9991(72)90089–7.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bert, C. W. and Malik, M. (1996). “Differential quadrature method in computational mechanics: A review.” Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–28. DOI: 10.1115/1.3101882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruno, L. and Venuti, F. (2009). “Crowd–structure interaction in footbridges: Modelling, application to a real case–study and sensitivity analyses.” Journal of Sound & Vibration, vol. 323, no. 1, pp. 475–493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprani, C. C., Archbold, P., Keogh, J., and Fanning, P. (2011). “Characteristic vertical response of a footbridge due to crowd loading.” 8 th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EuroDyn 2011, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  6. Da, S. F. T., Fernandes, B. H. M. B., and Leal, P. R. (2013). “Modeling of crowd load in vertical direction using biodynamic model for pedestrians crossing footbridges.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1196–1204. DOI: 10.1139/cjce–2011–0587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eftekhari, S. A. (2015a). “A differential quadrature procedure with regularization of the dirac–delta function for numerical solution of moving load problem.” Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1241–1265. DOI: 10.1590/1679–78251417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eftekhari, S. A. (2015b). “A note on mathematical treatment of the dirac–delta function in the differential quadrature bending and forced vibration analysis of beams and rectangular plates subjected to concentrated loads.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 39, no. 20, pp. 6223–6242. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.01.063.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eftekhari, S. A. (2016). “A modified differential quadrature procedure for numerical solution of moving load problem.” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, vol. 230, no. 5, pp. 715–731. DOI: 10.1177/0954406215584630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fanning, P. J., Archbold, P., and Pavic, A. (2005). “A novel interactive pedestrian load model for flexible footbridges.” Proceeding of the 2005 Society for Experimental Mechanics Annual Conference on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Portland, Oregon, June, pp. 72–80.Google Scholar
  11. Fung, T. C. (2015). “Solving initial value problems by differential quadrature method—Part 1: First–order equations.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1411–1427. DOI: 10.1002/1097–0207(20010228)50:6<1411::AIDNME78> 3.0.CO;2–O.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao, Y. A., Wang, J., and Liu, M. (2017). “The vertical dynamic properties of flexible footbridges under bipedal crowd induced excitation.” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 677, DOI: 10.3390/app7070677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hauksson, F. (2005). “Dynamic behaviour of footbridges subjected to pedestrian–induced vibrations.”Google Scholar
  14. Helbing, D., Farkas, I., and Vicsek, T. (2000). “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic.” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 487–490. DOI: 10.1038/35035023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helbing, D., Molnár, P., Farkas, I. J., and Kai, B. (2001). “Self–organizing pedestrian movement.” Environment & Planning B Planning Design, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 361–383. DOI: 10.1068/b2697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HelbingpÉ, D. and MolnÁ, T. (1998). “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics.” Physical Review E Statistical Physics Plasmas Fluids & Related Interdisciplinary Topics, Vol. 51, No. 5, p. 4282, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282.Google Scholar
  17. Henderson, L. F. (1974). “On the fluid mechanics of human crowd motion.” Transportation Research, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 509–515. DOI: 10.1016/0041–1647(74)90027–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoogendoorn, S. and Bovy, P. H. L. (2003) “Simulation of pedestrian flows by optimal control and differential games.” Optimal Control Applications & Methods, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 153–172. DOI: 10.1002/oca.727.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Juang, J. N. (1994). Applied system identification, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, S. S., Qian, D. L., and Wang, J. Z. (2012). “Improved social force model considering pedestrian deceleration to avoid collision.” Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 623–628.Google Scholar
  21. Maca, J. and Valasek, M. (2011). “Interaction of human gait and footbridges.” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EuroDyn 2011, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
  22. Manual, H. C. (2000). Transportation research board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Parisi, D. R., Gilman, M., and Moldovan, H. (2012). “A modification of the social force model can reproduce experimental data of pedestrian flows in normal conditions.” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, vol. 388, no. 17, pp. 3600–3608. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2009.05.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pimentel, R. L., Pavic, A., and Waldron, P. (2001) “Evaluation of design requirements for footbridges excited by vertical.” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 769–777. DOI: 10.1139/l01–036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qin, J. W., Law, S. S., Yang, Q. S., and Yang, N. (2013). “Pedestrian–bridge dynamic interaction, including human participation.” Journal of Sound & Vibration, vol. 332, no. 4, pp. 1107–1124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., and Lippert, T. (2006). “Basics of modelling the pedestrian flow.” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, vol. 368, no. 1, pp. 232–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shahabpoor, E., Pavic, A., Racic, V., and Zivanovic, S. (2016). “Effect of group walking traffic on dynamic properties of pedestrian structures.” Journal of Sound & Vibration, vol. 387, pp. 207–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva, F. T. and Pimentel, R. L. (2011) “Biodynamic walking model for vibration serviceability of footbridges in vertical direction.” Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EuroDyn 2011, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 1090–1096.Google Scholar
  29. Singh, H., Arter, R., Dodd, L., Langston, P., Lester, E., and Drury, J. (2009). “Modelling subgroup behaviour in crowd dynamics DEM simulation.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 4408–4423. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2009.03.020.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Venuti, F., Racic, V., and Corbetta, A. (2016). “Modelling framework for dynamic interaction between multiple pedestrians and vertical vibrations of footbridges.” Journal of Sound & Vibration, vol. 379, pp. 245–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2016.05.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang, E., Liu, Z. H., and Shao, X. C. (2010) “Simulation of human vibration characteristics based on 9–DOF riding dynamics model.” Journal of Traffic & Transportation Engineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 58–64.Google Scholar
  32. Živanović, S., Pavić, A., and Reynolds, P. (2007) “Probability–based prediction of multi–mode vibration response to walking excitation.” Engineering Structures, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 942–954. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiankun Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaoli Hui
    • 1
  • Nana Nan
    • 1
  • Yongfeng Du
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Earthquake Protection and Disaster MitigationLanzhou University of TechnologyLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations