Behaviors of Wall and Ground due to T-shaped Excavation
- 12 Downloads
Extensive monitoring was performed on a T-shaped site with a length of 280 m, a width of 16 m, and a maximal depth of 20.4 m. The braced excavation was performed under retaining comprised of cast-in-situ bored piles and jet grouting piles. The field databased wall performance and its influences to ground were assessed by detailed comparisons with that in other excavations. It is showed that the wall deflections, ground movements and bracing forces all exhibited a typical camelback-shaped characteristic along the length direction, and a maximum 100% reduction of which was observed due to the jet grouting. The rebar near sections with varied excavation depths was in a tension state both on the excavation and the retained sides due to the two-dimensional unbalanced force, and the corresponding bracing force was small. The maximum wall deflection δhm decreased as the partitioning excavation moved horizontally, and it was less than 0.04% of the final horizontal excavation length Le. The normalized Fσmax approximately approached to be identical with the normalized Fbmax, while most of the occurring depths for Fσmax were greater than that for Fbmax.
KeywordsT-shaped excavation large length-width ratio varied excavation depth jet grouting wall and ground behaviors
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Borges, J. L. and Guerra, G. T. (2014). “Cylindrical excavations in clayey soils retained by jet grout walls: Numerical analysis and parametric study considering the influence of consolidation.” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 42–56, DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fearnhead, N., Standing, J. R., Maniscalco, K., and Wan, M. S. (2014). “Deep excavations: Monitoring mechanisms of ground displacement.” Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 67, No. GE2, pp. 117–129, DOI: 10.1680/geng.13.00047.Google Scholar
- Li, S., Zhang, D. L., Fang, Q., and Li, Z. J. (2012). “Research on characteristics of retaining wall deformation due to deep excavation in Beijing.” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2344–2353 (In Chinese), DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.11.024.Google Scholar
- Liao, S. M., Wei, S. F., Tan, Y., and Liu, J. X. (2015). “Field performance of large-scale deep excavations in Suzhou.” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 459–469 (In Chinese) DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201503009.Google Scholar
- Osman, A. S. and Bolton, M. D. (2006). “Design of braced excavations to limit ground movements.” Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 159, No. GE3, pp. 167–175, DOI: 10.1680/geng.2006.159.3.167.Google Scholar
- Peck, R. B. (1969). “Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground. State-of the-art-report.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE), Mexico City, Mexico, pp. 225–281.Google Scholar
- Tan, Y. and Wang, D. L. (2013a). “Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. I: Bottom-up construction of the central cylindrical shaft.” Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 139, no. 11, pp. 1894–1910, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tan, Y. and Wang, D. L. (2013b). “Characteristics of a large-scale deep foundation pit excavated by the central-island technique in Shanghai soft clay. II: Top-down construction of the peripheral rectangular pit.” Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 139, no. 11, pp. 1894–1910, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu, Z. H. (2007). “Deformation behavior of deep excavations supported by permanent structures in Shanghai soft deposit.” PhD Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (In Chinese).Google Scholar