Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 3807–3817 | Cite as

Effect of MgO Activity Index on Physicochemical, Electrical and Mechanical Properties of Carbonated MgO-admixed Silt

  • Guanghua Cai
  • Songyu LiuEmail author
  • Guangyin Du
  • Liang Wang
Geotechnical Engineering
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The natural soil will have a significant strength improvement when admixed with reactive magnesia (MgO) and subjected to CO2 carbonation, which has been identified as an innovative and environment-friendly technique in the domain of soil treatment. MgO activity has been revealed to have a significant influence on the treatment effectiveness during the carbonation process. With this in view, the effect of MgO activity index on physicochemical, electrical and strength properties of carbonated silt was investigated. Results show that the MgO activity index and initial water-MgO ratio play crucial roles in controlling the aforementioned properties. With the initial water-MgO ratio reducing or MgO activity index increasing, the mass increment ratio, growth rate of unit weight, pH, resistivity, strength and CO2 sequestration increase to different degrees, while the volume increment ratio, water content, specific gravity, porosity and saturation degree decrease. The unconfined compressive strength shows a better linear relation with resistivity, indicating the applicability of resistivity method in the strength evaluation of carbonated MgO-admixed soil. Moreover, the thermal and microstructural analyses have explained the changing mechanism of physicochemical, electrical and strength properties. Finally, the analysis of the CO2 sequestration indicates that the carbonated MgO-admixed silt could achieve a high carbonation degree when the initial water-MgO ratio is less than 2.0, showing the feasibility of MgO carbonation in the CO2 sequestration.

Keywords

carbonation reactive magnesia activity index physicochemical properties electrical resistivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (18KJB560012), Youth Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Nanjing Forestry University (CX2018005, GXL2018028), Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Traffic Engineering Construction Bureau (2018T01), NSFC (41330641), Basic Research Project of Central University (2242019K30039) and Ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development Science and Technology Project Plan (2018-K7-013).

References

  1. AruLrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Bo, M. W., and Sivakugan, N. (2012). “Geotechnical characteristics of recycled crushed brick blends for pavement sub-base applications.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 7, pp. 796–811, DOI: 10.1139/12012-041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cai, G. H., Du, Y. J., Liu, S. Y., and Singh, D. N. (2015b). “Physical properties, electrical resistivity and strength characteristics of carbonated silty soil admixed with reactive magnesia.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 1699–1713, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, G. H. and Liu, S. Y. (2014). A method of mass carbonation stabilization of soft soil, ZL 2014102729571, Chinese Patent, Beij ing, China.Google Scholar
  4. Cai, G. H. and Liu, S. Y. (2017). “Compaction and mechanical characteristics and stabilization mechanism of carbonated reactive MgO-stabilized silt.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 7, pp. 2641–2654, DOI: 10.1007/sl2205-017-1145-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai, G. H., Liu, S. Y., and Cao, J. J. (2017b). “Influence of initial water content on strength and electrical resistivity of MgO-carbonated silt.” China Journal of Highway Transportation, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 18–26, DOI: 1001-7372(2017)11-0018-09.Google Scholar
  6. Cai, G. H., Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., and Cao, J. J. (2017a). “Influences of magnesia activity index on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia-admixed silty soil.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 04016285(1–12), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001787.Google Scholar
  7. Cai, G. H., Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., Zhang, D. W., and Zheng, X. (2015a). “Strength and deformation characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia treated silt soil.” Journal of Central South University, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 1859–1868, DOI: 10.1007/s11771-015-2705-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai, G. H., Liu, S. Y., and Zheng, X. (2019a). “Influence of drying-wetting cycles on the engineering properties of carbonated silt admixed with reactive MgO” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 204, pp. 84–93, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cai, G. H., Liu, S. Y., and Zheng, X. (2019b). “Effects of drying-wetting cycles on the durability of carbonated reactive magnesia-admixed clayey soil.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002940.Google Scholar
  10. Chinese Industry Standard (2006). Test methods for chemical activity of caustic burned magnesia, YB/T 4019-2006, Chinese Industry Standard, Shenzhen, China.Google Scholar
  11. Disfani, M., Arulrajah, A., Haghighi, H., Mohammadinia, A., and Horpibulsuk, S. (2014). “Flexural beam fatigue strength evaluation of crushed brick as a supplementary material in cement stabilized recycled concrete aggregates.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 68, pp. 667–676, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.007.Google Scholar
  12. Du, Y. J., Bo, Y. L., Jin, R., and Liu, S. Y. (2016). “Durability of reactive magnesia-activated slag-stabilized low plasticity clay subjected to drying-wetting cycle.” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 215–230, DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2015.1030088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du, Y. J., Jiang, N. J., Liu, S. Y., Jin, R., Singh, D. N., and Puppala, A. J. (2014). “Engineering properties and microstructural characteristics of cement-stabilized zinc-contaminated kaolin.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 289–302, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., and Chinkulkijniwat, A. (2012). “Soil stabilization by calcium carbide residue and fly ash.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 184–193, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., Cliinkulkijniwat, A., and Cholaphatsorn, A. (2013). “Strength development in silly clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash.” Soils and Foundation, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 477–486, DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jin, F. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2013). “Characterisation of different commercial reactive magnesia.” Advances in Cement Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 101–113, DOI: 10.1680/adcr.l3.00004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller, G. V. and Frischknecht, F. C. (1966). Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Liska, M. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2012). “Performance of magnesia cements in porous blocks in acid and magnesium environments.” Advances in Cement Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 221–232, DOI: 10.1680/adcr.11.00011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liska, M., Vandeperre, L. J., and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2008). “Influence of carbonation on the properties of reactive magnesia cement-based pressed masonry units.” Advances in Cement Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 53–64, DOI: 10.1680/adcr.2008.20.2.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu, S. Y., Cai, G. H., Cao, J. J., and Wang, F. (2017a). “Influence of soil type on strength and microstructure of carbonated reactive magnesiatreated soil.” European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, pp. 1–19, DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2017.1378925.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, S. Y., Cai, G. H., Wang, L., and Qin, C. (2017b). An ex-situ treatment method for carbonization and solidification using reactive MgO, ZL20171 11947973, Chinese Patent, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  22. Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., Han, L. H., and Gu, M. F. (2008). “Experimental study on the electrical resistivity of soil-cement admixtures.” Environmental Geology, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 1227–1233, DOI: 10.1007/s00254-007-0905-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, S. Y., Du, Y. J., Yi, Y. L., and Puppala, A. J. (2012). “Field investigations on performance of T-Shaped deep mixed soil cement column-supported embankments over soft ground.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 138, pp. 718–727, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT1943-5606.0000625.Google Scholar
  24. Sulmak, P., De Silva, P., Horpibulsuk, S., and Chindaprasirt, P. (2014). “Sulfate resistance of clay-portland cement and clay high-calcium fly ash geopolymer.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 04014158(1-11), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT1943-5533.0001112.Google Scholar
  25. Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S., Shen, S. L., Chindaprasirt, P., and Suksiripattanapong, C. (2013). “Factors influencing strength development in clay-fly ash geopolymer.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 47, pp. 1125–1136, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Unluer, C. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2013). “Impact of hydrated magnesium carbonate additives on the carbonation of reactive MgO cements.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 54, pp. 87–97, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Unluer, C. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2014). “Enhancing the carbonation of MgO cement porous blocks through improved curing conditions.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 55–65, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Unluer, C. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2015). “Theroleofbrucite, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, and magnesium silicates in the carbonation and performance of MgO cements.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 94, pp. 629–643, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yi, Y., Liska, M., Akinyugha, A., Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2013b). “Preliminary laboratory-scale model auger installation and testing of carbonated soil-MgO columns.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1520/GTJ20120052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yi, Y. L., Liaka, M., Unluer, C., and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2013a). “Carbonating magnesia for soil stabilization.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 50, No. 8, pp. 899–905, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2012-0364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yi, Y., Lu, K. W., Liu, S. Y., and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2016). “Property changes of reactive magnesia-stabilized soil subjected to forced carbonation.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 314–325, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao, Z. E., Zhou, M., Hu, Y. X., and Hossain, M. S. (2018). “Behavior of soil heave inside stiffened caissons being installed in clay.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 55, pp. 698–709, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Southeast UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations