Advertisement

Driver Behavior Analyses of 2+1 Roads based on a Driving Simulation Experiment

  • D. M. LeeEmail author
  • J. B. Lim
Transportation Engineering
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The Korean government has moved forward with the application of 2+1 roads to mitigate traffic delays and offer safety improvements relative to the two-lane highway. Before beginning construction of the first 2+1 road in Korea, calls have been made to conduct driver behavior studies prior to implementing these roadway types within the existing road network. In this study, experiments using a driving simulator were conducted to assess driver behavior on 2+1 roads. The study results suggest several concepts to be integrated into 2+1 road design in Korea. First, drivers tended to decrease speed suddenly in both critical and non-critical transition zones so that lane changing information system is significantly important in 2+1 roads. Second, the speed change patterns on the 2+1 roads were different for driver ages, with greater variations in speed by older drivers. Third, the locations of speed reductions are related to the passing lane lengths. Sufficient passing lane length is necessary to increase capacity and may offer safety benefits based on the driver behavior analyses. Fourth, inappropriate design of a passing lane can lead to traffic operational problems, especially for older drivers. Finally, safety treatments including median-delineators should be considered in bad weather conditions including snow.

Keywords

2+1 roads driver behavior safety a driving simulator two-lane highway 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks, V. A. and Stanton, N. A. (2015). “Contrasting models of driver behavior in emergencies using retrospective verbalizations and network analysis.” Ergonomics, Vol. 58, No. 8, pp. 1337–1346, DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1005175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergh, T., Carlsson, A., and Moberg, J. (2005). “2+1 roads_ with cable barriers-A SWEDISH a success story.” the Preceding of the third Symposium on Highway Geometric Design.Google Scholar
  3. Chae, C. D., Lee, D. M., and Cho, H. S. (2013). “Evaluation of 2+1 Roads Application to Improve Rural Two-Lane Highway in Korea.” International Journal of Highway Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 85–92, DOI: 10.7855/IJHE.2013.15.3.085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deller, J. (2015). “The influence of road design speed, posted speed limits and lane widths on speed selection: methodology for simulator and observational research study.” The Proceeding of 2015 AITPM Traffic and Transport Conference. Brisbane, Queensland, p. 12.Google Scholar
  5. Dijksterhuis, C., Lewis-Evans, B., Jelijs, B., de Waard, D., Brookhuis, K., and Tucha, O. (2015). “The impact of immediate or delayed feedback on driving behaviour in a simulated Pay-As-You-Drive system.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 75, pp. 93–104, DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding, H., Zhao, X., Rong, J., and Mab, J. (2015). “Experimental research on the effectiveness and adaptability of speed reduction markings in downhill sections on urban roads: A driving simulation study.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 75, pp. 119–127, DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrstedt, L. (2001). 2+1 roads-Danish experiences, Danish Transportation Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, D. M., Chae, C. D., Cho, H., and Lee, S. K. (2013). “Estimated design service traffic volume for 2+1 roads based on Korean twolane highway conditions.” Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 3–10, DOI: 10.7470/jkst.2013.31.2.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, S. K., Kim, Y. R., Moon, J. P., Choi, J. S., and Kim, T. H. (2010). “Operational analysis of 2+1 roadway and its use in developing geometric design standards in S. Korea.” 4th International Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  10. MOLIT (2010). Research report: Development of design guide of Korean 2+1 roads, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport.Google Scholar
  11. MOLIT (2012). Korean highway capacity manual, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport.Google Scholar
  12. MOLIT (2013). Research report: An analysis of driving safety on 2+1 roads based on driver behavior analysis, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport.Google Scholar
  13. Risto, M. and Martens, M. H. (2014). “Driver headway choice: A comparison between driving simulator and real-road driving.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 25, No. A, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandle, I., Barry, A., and David, H. (2005). “Wide single 2+1 carriageway in the U.K.” Preceding of the 3rd Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Szagala, P. (2005). “Analysis of 2+1 Roadway design alternative.” Preceding of the 3rd Symposium on Highway Geometric Design, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
  16. TRB (2003). National cooperative highway research program, research results digest: Application of European 2+1 roadway designs, Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Transportation EngineeringUniversity of SeoulSeoulKorea
  2. 2.Transportation Research & Evaluation OfficeKorea Transportation Safety AuthorityGimcheonKorea

Personalised recommendations