Determination and Prediction of Bonding Strength of Polymer Modified Concrete (PMC) as the Repair Overlay on the Conventional Concrete Substrate

  • Ali SadrmomtaziEmail author
  • Reza Kohani Khoshkbijari
Structural Engineering


In order to achieve a durable repair overlay, high bonding strength to substrate concrete and having the least amount of cracks in overlay are the main issues. Polymer Modified Concrete (PMC) consists of Portland cement concrete with a polymer modifier. Its advantages are proper bonding strength to substrate concrete, high tensile and flexural strength and low amount of shrinkage and permeability which makes it a suitable material for repair overlays. In this paper, 24 mix designs of polymer modified concrete as the repair overlay containing two different types of modifier polymers (Styrene Butadiene Resin (SBR)-based and Acrylic-based polymers) with different replacement percentages and various amounts of silica fume was considered to investigate the effect of type and amount of polymers and also properties of the mentioned overlays on their bonding strength to the substrate concrete. Two different methods for bonding assessment had been used and compared with each other. In both polymer modifiers, maximum bonding occurred in presence of polymer with 20% of cement weight. SBR-based PMC showed stronger bonding than other type of modified concrete. According to the results, with aid of linear regression analysis and Fuzzy Logic method the bonding strengths are predicted with acceptable accuracy.


Polymer Modified Concrete (PMC) bonding strength repair overlay polymer SBR acrylic 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ASTM C33/C33M–16 (2016). “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates.” ASTM International, DOI: 10.1520/C0033_C0033M-16E01.Google Scholar
  2. ASTM D7234–12 (2012). “Standard test method for pull-off adhesion strength of coatings on concrete using portable pull-off adhesion testers.” ASTM International, DOI: 10.1520/D7234-12.Google Scholar
  3. Atzeni, C., Massidda, L., and Sanna, U. (1993). “Dimensional variations, capillary absorption and freeze-thaw resistance of repair mortars admixed with polymers.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 301–308, DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(93)90095-Q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barluenga, G. and Hernandez, F. (2004). “SBR latex modified mortar rheology and mechanical behaviour.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 527–535, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beushausen, H. and Gillmer, M. (2014). “The use of superabsorbent polymers to reduce cracking of bonded mortar overlays.” Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol. 52, pp. 1–8, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beushausen, H., Gillmer, M., and Alexander, M. (2014). “The influence of superabsorbent polymers on strength and durability properties of blended cement mortars.” Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol. 52, pp. 73–88, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bissonnette, B., Pierre, P., and Pigeon, M. (1999). “Influence of key parameters on drying shrinkage of cementitious materials.” Cement and Concrete Research, pp. 1655–1662, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846 (99)00156-8.Google Scholar
  8. Challal, O., Benmokrane, B., and Ballivy, G. (1992). “Drying shrinkage strains: Experimental versus codes.” ACI Material Journal, Vol. 89, pp. 263–266.Google Scholar
  9. Delatte, N. J., Williamson, M. S., and Fowler, D. W. (2000). “Bond strength development of high-earlystrength bonded concrete overlays.” ACI Materials Journal, pp. 201–207.Google Scholar
  10. Diab, A. M., Elyamany, H. E., and Ali, A. H. (2014). “The participation ratios of cement matrix and latex network in latex cement co-matrix strength.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 309–317, DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2014.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dogan, M. and Bideci, A. (2016). “Effect of Styrene Butadiene Copolymer (SBR) admixture on high strength concrete.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 112, pp. 378–385, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler, D. W. (1999). “Polymers in concrete: A vision for the 21st century.” Cement & Concrete Composites, pp. 449–452, DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(99)00032-3.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, W. and Almudaiheem, J. A. (1987). “Ultimate drying shrinkage of concrete–influence of major parameters.” ACI Material Journal, Vol. 84, No. 3, pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
  14. Manson, J. A. (1976). “Modifications of concretes with polymers.” Materials Science and Engineering, Vol 25, pp. 41–52, DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(76)90050-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Momayez, A., Ehsani, M. R., Ramezanianpour, A. A., and Rajaie, H. (2005). “Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 748–757, DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.05.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohama, Y. (1995). Handbook of polymer modified concrete and mortars, William Andrew, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Rossignolo, J. A. and Agnesini, M. V. C. (2002). “Mechanical properties of polymer-modified lightweight aggregate concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 329–334, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00678-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rossignolo, J. A. and Agnesini, M. V. C. (2004). “Durability of polymermodified lightweight aggregate concrete.” Cement & Concrete Composites, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 375–380, DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(03)00022-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. SadrMomtazi, A and Kohani Khoshkbijari, R (2017a). “An investigation on in-situ strength and bonding strength of Polymer Modified Concretes (PMC) as repair overlays on conventional concrete substrate.” Journal of Rehabilitation in Civil Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 67–78, DOI: 10.22075/JRCE.2017.10660.1172.Google Scholar
  20. SadrMomtazi, A and Kohani Khoshkbijari, R (2017b). “Bonding durability of polymer modified concrete repair overlays under freeze-thaw conditions.” Magazine of Concrete Research, Vol. 69, No. 24, pp. 1268–1275, DOI: 10.1680/jmacr.17.00014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shaker, F. A., El-Dieb, A. S., and Reda, M. M. (1997). “Durability of styrene-butadiene latex modified concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 711–720, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846 (97)00055-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silfwerbrand, J., Beushausen, H., and Courard, L. (2011). “Bonded cement-based material overlays for the repair, the lining or the strenghening of slabs or pavements.” The Series RILEM State of the Art Reports, Vol. 3, pp. 51–79.Google Scholar
  23. Son, S. W. and Yeon, J. H. (2012). “Mechanical properties of acrylic polymer concrete containing methacrylic acid as an additive.” Construction and Building Materials, pp. 669–679, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.093.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, L. X. (1997). A course in fuzzy systems and control, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall PTR, NJ, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Yetilmezsoy, K. (2012). “Fuzzy-logic modeling of Fenton’s oxidation of anaerobically pretreated poultry manure wastewater.” Environ Sci Pollut Res, Vol. 19, pp. 2227–2237, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-011-0726-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yetilmezsoy, K. and Abdul-Wahab, S. A. (2012). “A prognostic approach based on fuzzy-logic methodology to forecast PM10 levels in Khaldiya residential area, Kuwait.” Aerosol Air Qual Res, Vol. 12, pp. 1217–1236, DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy Set.” Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338–353.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of GuilanRashtIran
  2. 2.Young Researchers and Elite Club, Rasht BranchIslamic Azad UniversityRashtIran

Personalised recommendations