Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 632–640 | Cite as

The Non-gradient-based Reliability Method in Equivalent Linear Systems for Nonlinear Random Vibration

  • Saeid Pourzeynali
  • Hossein AbbaszadehEmail author
Structural Engineering
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

A conventional approach for nonlinear random vibration analysis is using equivalent linearization method. Tail-Equivalent Linearization Method (TELM) is one the best proposed methods in the recent decade for determination of equivalent linear model. In TELM, the design point is obtained using first-order reliability method. In the current research, a non-gradient-based method is applied for determination of the design point. One of the main advantages of this method is non-application of limit-state function gradient for calculation of the design point. In the implemented method, n arbitrary points in n-dimension standard normal space are selected and limit-state function in these points is estimated. Then, these points converge to the design point using a convergent algorithm. Since many random variables are produced in TELM for discretization of seismic excitation, iterative algorithms for determination of design point numerical instability would be encountered. By modification of step length for each iteration and application of a magnification coefficient for each step, an appropriate non-gradient method is proposed for analysis of the problems with many random variables. The efficiency of this method was investigated by solving numerical examples. Moreover, the convergence of this method for finding the design point was presented. It was also indicated that results obtained using this method are in good agreement with results obtained by gradient methods.

Keywords

reliability non-gradient-based method random vibration tail-equivalent linearization discretization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bong, T. and Son, Y. (2018). “A stochastic dual response surface method for reliability analysis considering the spatial variability.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 3524–3533, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0803-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouc, R. (1967). “Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis.” Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Non-linear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia, p. 315.Google Scholar
  3. Broccardo, M. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2015). “Multicomponent nonlinear stochastic dynamic analysis by tail-equivalent linearization.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 142, No. 3, pp. 1–15, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001026.Google Scholar
  4. Caughey, T. K. (1963). “Equivalent linearization techniques.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 35, No. 11, pp. 1706–1711.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Der Kiureghian, A. (2000). “The geometry of random vibrations and solutions by FORM and SORM.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 81–90, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00011-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H. O. (1996). Structural reliability methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Faravelli, L. (1989). “Response-surface approach for reliability analysis.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 115, No. 12, pp. 2763–2781, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1989)115:12(2763).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujimura, K. (2006). Tail equivalent linearization method for nonlinear random vibration, PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Fujimura, K. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2007). “Tail-equivalent linearization method for nonlinear random vibration.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 63–76, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2006.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gong, J. X., Yi, P., and Zhao, N. (2014). “Non-gradient-based algorithm for structural reliability analysis.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 140, No. 6, pp. 1–16, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haukaas, T. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2006). “Strategies for finding the design point in non-linear finite element reliability analysis.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 133–147, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haukaas, T. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2007). “Methods and object-oriented software for FE reliability and sensitivity analysis with application to a bridge structure.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 151–163, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:3(151).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huh, J. (2000). “Reliability analysis of nonlinear structural systems using response surface method.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 135–143, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahani, E., Shayanfar, M. A., and Barkhordari, M. A. (2013). “A new adaptive importance sampling Monte Carlo methods for structural reliability.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 210–215, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1779-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keshtegar, B. and Meng, Z. (2017). “A hybrid relaxed first-order reliability method for efficient structural reliability analysis.” Structural Safety, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 84–93, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, T. and Song, J. (2018). “Generalized Reliability Importance Measure (GRIM) using Gaussian mixture.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 173, No. 1, pp. 105–115, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleiber, M., Antunez, H., Hien T. D., and Kowalczyk, P. (1997). Parameter sensitivity in nonlinear mechanics: Theory and finite element computations, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Koduru, S. D. and Haukaas, T. (2010). “Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis.” Structural Safety, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 145–153, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, J. and Chen, J. B. (2009). Stochastic dynamics of structures, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin, Y. K. and Cai, G. Q. (2004). Probabilistic structural dynamic: Advanced theory and applications, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, P. L. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1991). “Optimization algorithms for structural reliability.” Structural Safety, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 161–177, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lutes, L. D. and Sarkani, S. (2004). Random vibrations: Analysis of structural and mechanical systems, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington.Google Scholar
  23. Polyanin, A. D. and Manzhirov, A. V. (2006). Handbook of mathematics for engineers and scientists, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Roberts, J. B. and Spanos, P. D. (1990). Random vibration and statistical linearization, John Wiley & Sons, NY, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., and Roudak, M. A. (2017). “An efficient reliability algorithm for locating design point using the combination of importance sampling concepts and response surface method.” Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 223–237, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Soong, T. T. and Grigoriu, M. (1993). Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Thoft-Christensen, P. and Baker, M. J. (1982). Structural reliability theory and its applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. To, C. W. S. (2012). Nonlinear random vibrations: Analytical techniques and applications, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Z. and Der Kiureghian, A. (2016). “Tail-equivalent linearization of inelastic multi-support structures subjected to spatially varying stochastic ground motion.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 142, No. 8, pp. 1–14, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001106.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, Z. and Song, J. (2017). “Equivalent linearization method using Gaussian mixture (GM-ELM) for nonlinear random vibration analysis.” Structural Safety, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 9–19, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.08.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wen, Y. K. (1976). “Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems.” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Vol. 102, No. 2, pp. 249–263.Google Scholar
  32. Zhang, Y. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1993). “Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 108, Nos. 1–2, pp. 23–36, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(93)90151-M.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, Y. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1995). “Two improved algorithms for reliability analysis.” Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems, pp. 297–304, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34866-7_32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of GuilanRashtIran

Personalised recommendations