Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 549–555 | Cite as

Analysis of Stress-strain Characteristics of Geogrid Reinforced Crushed Gravel

  • Ruiqing Lang
  • Aiwu Yang
  • Shuwang Yan
Geotechnical Engineering
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

To study the stress-strain characteristics of reinforced cushion with multi-layer geogrids, a new calculation method was proposed. Based on hyperbolic model, the reinforced cushion was regard as a nonlinear elastomer. The effect of reinforcing geogrids was considered as an equivalent additional pressure and included into the gravel skeleton. Considering the friction effect between geogrids and crushed gravel, the calculation method of stress-strain relationship and shear strength of the reinforced crushed gravel was deduced through definite integral. The proposed method was verified by triaxial tests and the calculated results were in good agreement with the measured data. Furthermore, the key parameters influencing the shear strength, such as the total number of geogrids, the geogrids spacing and the corresponding position, were quantified through sensitivity analysis. The effects of the key parameters on the stress-strain relationship of reinforced cushion were determined. It is shown that the ability of reinforced body to resist bulging deformation is great improved by geogrids. The key parameters are the confining pressure and the total number of geogrids. With the increase of the total number and the confining pressure, the shear strength of the reinforced body increases; but the shear strength is less affected by its location. The research results can provide reference for practical projects.

Keywords

geogrids reinforced crushed gravel stress-strain equivalent confining pressure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajayi, O., Pen, L. L., Zervos, A., and Powrie, W. (2016). “A behavioural framework for fibre-reinforced gravel.” Géotechnique, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 1–13, DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.16.P.023.Google Scholar
  2. Badawy, M. F., Msekh, M. A., Hamdia, K. M., Steiner, M. K., Lahmer, T., and Rabczuk, T. (2017). “Hybrid nonlinear surrogate models for fracture behavior of polymeric nanocomposites.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 50, No. 2017, pp. 64–75, DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2017.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Consoli, N. C., Coop, M. R., and Casagrande, M. D. T. (2007). “Performance of a fibre-reinforced sand at large shear strains.” Géotechnique, Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 751–756, DOI: 10.1680/geot.2007.57.9.751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dehghan, A. and Hamidi, A. (2016). “Triaxial shear behaviour of sandgravel mixtures reinforced with cement and fibre.” International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 510–520, DOI: 10.1080/19386362.2016.1175217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray, D. H. and Al-Refeai, T. (1986). “Behavior of fabric-versus fiberreinforced sand.” Scientia Horticulturae, Vol. 112, No. 8, pp. 181–187, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1986)112:8(804).Google Scholar
  6. Hamdia, K. M., Ghasemi, H., Zhuang, X., Alajlan, N., and Rabczuk, T. (2018). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for flexoelectric nanostructures.” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, Vol. 337, No. 2018, pp. 95–109, DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.03.016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamdia, K. M., Silani, M., Zhuang, X., He, P., and Rabczuk, T. (2017). “Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions.” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 206, No. 2, pp. 215–227, DOI: 10.1007/s10704-017-0210-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang, X. (2005). The experimental and theoretical research and its application of geobelt reinforced gravel cushion foundation, PhD Thesis, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, China.Google Scholar
  9. Salour, F. and Erlingsson, S. (2016). “Permanent deformation characteristics of silty sand subgrades from multistage RLT tests.” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 236–246, DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1065991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Saltelli, A. and Marivoet, J. (1990). “Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: A comparison of selected techniques.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 229–253, DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(90)90065-u.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shewbridge, S. E. and Sitar, N. (1989). “Deformation characteristics of reinforced sand in direct shear.” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 8, pp. 1134–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vu-Bac, N., Lahmer, T., Keitel, H., Zhao, J., Zhuang, X., and Rabczuk, T. (2014). “Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations.” Mechanics of Materials, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 70–84, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1989)115:8(1134).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vu-Bac, N., Lahmer, T., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, X., and Rabczuk, T. (2014). “Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (pncs).” Composites Part B, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 80–95, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vu-Bac, N., Lahmer, T., Zhuang, X., Nguyen-Thoi, T., and Rabczuk, T. (2016). “A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models.” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 100, No. 2016, pp. 19–31, DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vu-Bac, N., Rafiee, R., Zhuang, X., Lahmer, T., and Rabczuk, T. (2015). “Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters.” Composites Part B, Vol. 68, No. 2015, pp. 446–464, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vu-Bac, N., Silani, M., Lahmer, T., Zhuang, X., and Rabczuk, T. (2015). “A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites.” Computational Materials Science, Vol. 96, No. 2015, pp. 520–535, DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.04.066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang, Z. (1972). Strength and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand, PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, American.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringTianjin Chengjian UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations