Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 666–677 | Cite as

Lateral Structural Performance of Column Frame Layer and Dou-Gong Layer in a Timber Structure

  • Xian-jie Meng
  • Tie-ying LiEmail author
  • Qing-shan Yang
Structural Engineering
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, a 1:2 scale model of a timber building with a column frame layer and a Dou-Gong layer was fabricated according to the construction method that prevailed during the Song dynasty, China (A.D. 960–1279). Three quasi-static tests were conducted on the model under three levels of vertical loads to study the seismic response of the column frame layer and Dou-Gong layer in a timber structure. The experimental results indicated that the ultimate loading state of the timber structure was mainly controlled by the lateral displacement of the column frame layer. The hysteretic behaviour and stiffness characteristics of the column frame layer were quite similar to those of the overall structure. The stiffness of the Dou-Gong layer was much higher than that of the column frame layer, and no stiffness degradation was observed in the Dou-Gong layer. Fairly little energy was dissipated by the Dou-Gong layer; more than 80% of the structural energy dissipation that occurred was attributable to the column frame layer. Moreover, based on the deformation features of the column frame and Dou-Gong layer, a theoretical model for estimating the restoring force of the overall structure was established.

Keywords

timber structure hysteretic behaviour stiffness lateral displacement energy dissipation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen, J. Y., Li, T. Y., Yang, Q. S., Shi, X. W., and Zhao, Y. X. (2018). “Degradation laws of hysteretic behaviour for historical timber buildings based on pseudo-static tests.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 156, pp. 480–489, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, C. C., Qiu, H. X., and Lu, Y. (2016a). “Flexural behaviour of timber dovetail mortise-tenon joints.” Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 112, pp. 366–377, DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, J. Y., Shi, X. W., Niu, Q. F., Wei, J. W., Li, T. Y., and Zhao, Y. X. (2016b). “Analysis of similar CaiFen modular system based on the weight of the roof of Song dynasty.” Journal of Civil Architectural & Environmental Engineering, No. 5, pp. 27–33 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  4. Chen, Z. Y., Zhu, E. C., Pan, J. L., and Wu, G. F. (2016c). “Energy dissipation performance of typical beam–column joints in Yingxian Wood Pagoda: Experimental study.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 04015028(10), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chun, Q., Yue, Z., and Pan, J. W. (2011). “Experimental study on seismic characteristics of typical mortise-tenon joints of Chinese southern traditional timber frame buildings.” Science China Technological Sciences, Vol. 54, No. 9, pp. 2404–2411, DOI: 10.1007/s11431-011-4448-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Construction Science Research Institute of Sichuan Province (1993). Ancient wood structure maintenance and reinforcement technique specification, China Building Industry Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. D’Ayala, D. and Tsai, P. (2008). “Seismic vulnerability of historic Dieh–Dou timber structures in Taiwan.” Engineering Structures, Vol 30, No. 8, pp. 2101–2113, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GB/T 1928–2009 (2009). “General requirements for physical and mechanical tests of wood.” Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  9. Harrer, A. (2010). Fan-shaped bracket sets and their application in religious timber architecture of Shanxi province, PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Li, J. (2011). Ying-tsao-fa-shi, People’s Publishing House, Beijing, China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. Li, X. W., Zhao, J. H., Ma, G. W., and Chen, W. (2015a). “Experimental study on the traditional timber mortise-tenon joints.” Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 12, pp. 2089–2102, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, X. W., Zhao, J. H., Ma, G. W., and Chen, W. (2015b). “Experimental study on the seismic performance of a double-span traditional timber frame.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 98, pp. 141–5, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maeda, T. (2008). “Column rocking behavior of traditional wooden buildings in Japan.” 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering, Miyazaki, Japan.Google Scholar
  14. Maeno, M., Suzuki, Y., Ohshita, T., and Akio Kitahara, A. (2004). “Seismic response characteristics of traditional wooden frame by full-scale dynamic and static tests.” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Canada, No. 1184.Google Scholar
  15. Meng X. J., Chen J. Y., Shi X. W., Niu Q. F., Wei J. W., and Li T. Y (2016). “An experimental study of the wood performance under whole section compression in the transverse direction.” China Sciencepaper, No. 1, pp. 62–65 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  16. Sui, Y., Zhao, H. T., Xue, J. Y. Xie, Q. F., and Liu, Y. (2010). “Experimental study on lateral stiffness of Dougong layer in Chinese historic buildings.” Engineering Mechanics, No. 03, pp. 74–8 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  17. Suzuki, Y. and Maeno, M. (2006). “Structural mechanism of traditional wooden frames by dynamic and static tests.” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 508–522, DOI: 10.1002/stc.153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tsuwa, I., Koshihara, M., Fujita, K., and Sakamoto, I. (2008). “A Study on the size effect of bracket complexes used in traditional timber structures on the vibration characteristics.” 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering, Miyazaki, Japan.Google Scholar
  19. Xue, J. Y., Wu, Z. J., Zhang, F. L., and Zhao, H. T. (2015). “Seismic damage evaluation model of Chinese ancient timber buildings.” Advances in Structural Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 10, pp. 1671–1683, DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.18.10.1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yasumura, M., Kobayashi, K., Okabe, M., Miyake, T., and Matsumoto, K. (2016). “Full-scale tests and numerical analysis of low-rise CLT structures under lateral loading.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 142, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001348.Google Scholar
  21. Yuan, J. L., Chen, W., Wang, Y., and Shi, Y. (2011). “Experimental research on bracket set models of Yingxian timber pagoda.” Journal of Building Structures, No. 7, pp. 66–72 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  22. Zhao, H. T., Zhang, X. C., Xue, J. Y., Sui, Y., and Zhang, F. L. (2011). “Conceptual design thoughts of Chinese ancient timber buildings.” Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Edition), No. 4, pp. 457–463 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Zhou, Q. and Yan, W. M. (2015). “Aseismic behaviors of ancient Chinese structures strengthened by different methods.” Studies in Conservation, Vol. 60, No. 6, pp. 384–92, DOI: 10.1179/2047058414Y.0000000137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and Civil EngineeringTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanChina
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  3. 3.Beijing’s Key Laboratory of Structural Wind Engineering and Urban Wind EnvironmentBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations