Dewatering of a 32.55 m deep foundation pit in MAMA under leakage risk conditions

  • Jianxiu Wang
  • Xiaotian Liu
  • Jiaxing Liu
  • Linbo Wu
  • Qingfeng Guo
  • Qian Yang
Geotechnical Engineering
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

A 2,250 mm whirlpool foundation pit is located in Donghai Island, Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, China. The layers of the island are composed of multi-aquifers and multi-aquitards (MAMA). The aquifers are intersected by partial aquitard lenses. A large confined aquifer is frequently interbedded and separated into several sub-confined aquifers by partial aquitards. In the 2,250 mm foundation pit, the water level of two confined aquifers was reduced to satisfy excavation requirements and prevent water inrush. Construction of the 32.55 m deep foundation pit encountered MAMA and potential defects of the diaphragm wall. The pumping wells in the second confined aquifer were used to reduce the water level to ensure the safety of bottom excavation. The pumping wells in the first confined aquifer were used to reduce the water level under emergency conditions to prevent potential water inrush and piping from the defects of the diaphragm wall. Field pumping tests and numerical simulations were performed to determine the risk of leakage and verify the capability of the pumping wells to reduce the water level. Quicksand occurred during shallow excavation because of leakage although the confined aquifer had been cut off and pumped for a long time. Three pumping wells were installed to reduce the water level. When the foundation pit was excavated to a depth of 24 m, water inrush occurred at the middle of the pit bottom although the water level of the dewatered aquifer had been reduced to below the excavation face. A 90 m deep borehole was found where the underlying confined aquifer below the first aquifer induced the water inrush. Although the upper water level was reduced, the high water level in the deep part still induced water inrush. The pumping wells in the second aquifer were all opened, and the water level of the underlying confined aquifer was reduced. After the water level was reduced to below the pit bottom, the borehole was filled, and the water inrush stopped. However, water inrush occurred on the cracks of the diaphragm wall as predicted. The pre-installed pumping wells were opened to control the water inrush. The deepest foundation pit on the island was constructed successfully after dealing with the water inrush and leakages.

Keywords

multi-aquifer and multi-aquitard foundation pit dewatering water inrush field experiment numerical simulation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behrooz-Koohenjani, S., Samani, N., and Kompani-Zare, M. (2013). “Steady flow to a partially penetrating blind-wall well in a confined aquifer.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 27, No. 16, pp. 2271–2279, DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benaissa, K., Angel, P. V. M., Dlolores, R. C. M., Philippe, D., Abdellatif, K., Mohammed, B., and Larbi, E. B. (2012). “Predicting initial erosion during the hole erosion test by using turbulent flow CFD simulation.” Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 3359–3370, DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.036.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruthans, J., Svetlik, D., Soukup, J., Schweigstillova, J., Valek J., Sedlackova, M., and Mayo, A. L. (2012). “Fast evolving conduits in clay-bonded sandstone: Characterization, erosion processes and significance for the origin of sandstone landforms.” Geomorphology, Vols. 177-178, No. 12, pp. 178–193, DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph. 2012.07.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan, R. B. and Jones, J. A. A. (1997). “The significance of soil piping processes: Inventory and prospect.” Geomorphology, Vol. 20, No. 20, pp. 209–218, DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00024-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, L., Zhang, S., and Gui, H. (2014). “Prevention of water and quicksand inrush during extracting contiguous coal seams under the lowermost aquifer in the unconsolidated Cenozoic alluvium—a case study.” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 2139–2149, DOI: 10.1007/s12517-013-1029-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding, C. L., Li, Z. Q., Wu, X. P., and Wu, K. L. (2014). Analysis on inducing factors to inrushing plastic deformation failure of foundation pit with confined water, Geo-Shanghai. Shanghai, China. pp. 491–501.Google Scholar
  7. Delgado-Ramos, F., Poyatos, J. M., and Francisco, O. (2012). Internal erosion of clayey soils protected by granular filters, 6th ICSE. Paris, France, pp. 871–878.Google Scholar
  8. Fleshman, M. S. and Rice, J. D. (2014). “Laboratory modeling of the mechanisms of piping erosion initiation.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 140, No. 6, pp. 1943–5606, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guangdong Project Standardization Information Association (GDPSIA). (1997). Specification for Retaining and Protection in Building Excavation Engineering,1997, Guangzhou.Google Scholar
  10. Fontana, N. (2008). “Experimental analysis of heaving phenomena in sandy soils.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering–ASCE, Vol. 134, No. 6, pp. 794–799, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:6(794).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox, G. A., Felice, R. G., Midgley, T. L., Wilson, G. V., and Al-Madhhachi, A. S. T. (2014). “Laboratory soil piping and internal erosion experiments: Evaluation of a soil piping model for low-compacted soils.” Earth Surf Proc Land, Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 1137–1145, DOI: 10.1002/esp.3508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kadau, D., Andrade-Jr, J. S., and Herrmann, H. J. (2011). “A micromechanical model of collapsing quicksand.” Granul Matter, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 219–223, DOI: 10.1007/s10035-010-0236-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kompani-Zare, M., Samani, N., and Behrooz-Koohenjani, S. (2009). “Parameters affecting the occurrence of quicksand and the drying up of large diameter wells that gain water from the bottom: A case study from Iran.” Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 1175–1187, DOI: 10.1007/s10040-008-0426-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koyama, T., Nishiyama, S., Yang, M., and Ohnishi, Y. (2011). “Modeling the interaction between fluid flow and particle movement with Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (DDA) method.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1–20, DOI: 10.1002/nag.890.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Lomine, F., Scholtes, L., Sibille, L., and Poullain, P. (2013). “Modeling of fluidsolid interaction in granular media with coupled lattice Boltzmann/discrete element methods: Application to piping erosion.” International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 577–596, DOI: 10.1002/nag.1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ojha, C. S. P., Singh, V. P., and Adrian, D. D. (2003). “Determination of critical head in soil piping.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,-ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 7, pp. 511–518, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:7(511).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, J. L. and Zhang, H. Y. (2011). Application of BP Neural Network to determine of mine water inrush sources based on Matlab, 2nd AIMSEC. Zhengzhou, China, pp. 179–182.Google Scholar
  18. Luo, Z. J., Zhang, Y. Y., and Wu, Y. X. (2008). “Finite element numerical simulation of three-dimensional seepage control for deep foundation pit dewatering.” Journal of Hydrodynamics, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 596–602, DOI: 10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60100-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). (2012). Technical Specification for Retaining and Protection of Building Foundation Excavation (120-2012 JGJ), 2012.Beijing.Google Scholar
  20. Richards, K. S. and Reddy, K. R. (2010). “True triaxial piping test apparatus for evaluation of piping potential in earth structures.” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp 83–95, DOI: 10.1520/GTJ102246.Google Scholar
  21. Richards, K. S. and Reddy, K. R. (2012). “Experimental investigation of initiation of backward erosion piping in soils.” Geotechnique, Vol. 62, No. 10, pp. 933–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen, S. L., Ma, L., Xu, Y. S., and Yin, Z. Y. (2013). “Interpretation of increased deformation rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 1129–1142, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen, S. L. and Xu, Y. S. (2011). “Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 1378–1392, DOI: 10.1139/T11-049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun, Y. Y. and Wang, Y. M. (2013). Experimental study on factors influence on foundation-pit bursting in soft soil, 2nd CMCE. Hong Kong, China, pp. 231–237.Google Scholar
  25. Tomlinson, S. S. and Vaid, Y. P. (2000). “Seepage forces and confining pressure effects on piping erosion.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Verachtert, E., Maetens, W., Eeckhaut, M. V. D., Poesen, J., and Deckers, J. (2011). “Soil loss rates due to piping erosion.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, Vol. 36, No. 13, pp. 1715–1725, DOI: 10.1002/esp.2186View.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, J. X., Feng, B., Liu, Y., Wu, L. G., Zhu, Y. F., Zhang, X. S., Tang, Y. Q., and Yang, P. (2012). “Controlling subsidence caused by dewatering in a deep foundation pit.” Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ., Vol. 71, pp. 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, J. X., Feng, B., Guo, T. P., Wu, L. G., Lou, R. X., and Zhou, Z. (2013a). “Using partial penetrating wells and curtains to lower the water level of confined aquifer of gravel.” Engineering Geoloby, Vol. 161, No. 3, pp. 16–25, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, J. X., Feng, B., Yu, H. P., Guo, T. P., Yang, G. Y., and Tang, J. W. (2013b). “Numerical study of dewatering in a large deep foundation pit.” Environmental Earth Science, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 863–872, DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-1972-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, J. X. and Hu, L. S. (2009). “Hydraulic barrier function of the underground continuous concrete wall in the pit of subway station and its optimization.” Environmental Geology, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 447–453, DOI: 10.1007/s00254-008-1315-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, J. X., Liu, X. T., Xiang, J. D., and Jiang, Y. H. (2016). “Laboratory model tests on bottom aquitard water inrush in a foundation pit.” Environment Earth Science, Vol. 75, pp. 1072, DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5861-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu, L. G. (2003). Design and Construction of Dewatering Engineering and Theory of Pit Seepage, China Communication Press, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  33. Wuhan surveying-geotechnical research institute, Co., ltd. of MCC (WHSGRI). (2013). “Geotechnical investigation report of Zhanjiang steel hot-rolled 2250mm Engineering, Baosteel”. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  34. Wu, Y. X., Shen, S. L., Wu, H. N., Xu, Y. S., Yin, Z. Y., and Sun, W. J. (2015a). “Environmental protection using dewatering technology in a deep confined aquifer beneath a shallow aquifer.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 196, No. 28, pp. 59–70, DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015. 06.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, Y. X., Shen, S. L., Xu, Y. S., and Yin, Z. Y. (2015b) “Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. I: Field observations.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1526–1538, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2014-0285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu, Y. X., Shen, S. L., Yin, Z. Y., and Xu, Y. S. (2015c). “Characteristics of groundwater seepage with cut-off wall in gravel aquifer. II: Numerical analysis 1.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1539–1549, DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2014-0289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu, Y. S., Shen, S. L., Hayashi, S., and Cai, Z. Y. (2007). “Analysis on groundwater withdrawal and land subsidence in Shanghai.” Lowland Technology International, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar
  38. Xu, Y. S. and Ma, L. (2012). “Evaluation of land subsidence by considering underground structures that penetrate the aquifers of Shanghai, China.” Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 20, No. 20, pp. 1623–1634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu, Y. S., Shen, S. L., and Du, Y. J. (2013a). “Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multi-aquifer-aquitard groundwater system.” Natural Hazards, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 731–748, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu, Y. S., She,n S. L., Du, Y. J., Chai, J. C., and Suksun, H. (2013b). “Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multiaquifer-aquitard groundwater system” Natural Hazards, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 731–748, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zou, Z. N. and Zhang, Y. (2009). “Emergency treatment of an inrushing accident occurred in a steel swirl pool foundation pit in Liaoning, China.” Chinese Hi-tech Enterprises, Vol. 23, pp. 192–193. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianxiu Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Xiaotian Liu
    • 1
  • Jiaxing Liu
    • 1
  • Linbo Wu
    • 1
  • Qingfeng Guo
    • 1
  • Qian Yang
    • 4
  1. 1.College of Civil EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Geo Mechanics and Deep Underground EngineeringChina University of Mining & TechnologyXuzhouChina
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of EducationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.China MCC20 Group Co., ltdShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations