A Modification to HL-RF Method for Computation of Structural Reliability Index in Problems with Skew-distributed Variables
- 19 Downloads
Abstract
The Hasofer-Lind and Rackwitz-Fiessler (HL-RF) method in reliability analysis is a popular iterative method for obtaining the reliability index. However, in the cases of limit state functions with skew-distributed variables, HL-RF method may give inappropriate answers. This paper represents a modification to HL-RF method in order to improve its performance in such problems. Based on this modification, non-normal distributions are replaced with equivalent skew-normal distributions instead of equivalent normal distributions. By this modification, asymmetric non-normal distributions are not replaced with symmetric distributions anymore. It is demonstrated that this consideration of skewness of non-normal distributions improves the behavior of HL-RF method and makes the proposed method more reliable. This improvement is shown through illustrative examples.
Keywords
limit state function reliability index probability of failure HL-RF method skew-normal distributionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Azzalini, A. (1985). “A class of distributions which includes the normal ones.” Scand. J. Statist., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 171–178.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Azzalini, A. (1986). “Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones.” Statistica., Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 199–208, DOI: 10.6092/issn.1973-2201/711.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bjerager, P. (1990). “On computation methods for structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 79–96, DOI: 10.1016/ 0167-4730(90)90001-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Breitung, K. (1984). “Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals.” J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 357–366, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:3(357).CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Bucher, C. G. (1988). “Adaptive sampling—an iterative fast Monte Carlo procedure.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 119–126, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(88)90020-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, Z., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Su, L., and Li, P. (2013). “An adaptive decoupling approach for reliability-based design optimization.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 117, pp. 58–66, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cornell, C. A. (1969). “A probability based structural code.” J. Am. Concr. Insf., Vol. 66, Issue 12, pp. 974–985.Google Scholar
- Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H. O. (1996). “Structural Reliability Methods.” Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
- Gong, J. X. and Yi, P. (2011). “A robust iterative algorithm for structural reliability analysis.” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., Vol. 43, Issue 4, pp. 519–527, DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0582-y.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Harbitz, A. (1983). “Efficient and accurate probability of failure calculation by use of the importance sampling technique.” Proc. of the 4th int. conf. on app. of statist. and prob. in soils and struct. eng., ICASP-4. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna, pp. 825–836.Google Scholar
- Hasofer, A. M. and Lind, N. C. (1974). “Exact and invariant secondmoment code format.” J. Engng. Mech. Div. ASCE Vol. 100(EMl), Issue 1, pp. 111–121.Google Scholar
- Henze, N. (1986). “A probabilistic representation of the ‘skew-normal’ distribution.” Scand. J. Statist., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 271–275.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- Hohenbichler, M., Gollwitzer, S., Kruse, W., and Rackwitz, R. (1987). “New light on first-and second-order reliability methods.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 267–284, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(87) 90002-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jahani, E., Shayanfar, M. A., and Barkhordari, M. A. (2013). “A new adaptive importance sampling Monte Carlo method for structural reliability.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 210–215, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-013-1779-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kiureghian, D. A., Lin, H. Z., and Hwang, S. J. (1987). “Second order reliability approximations.” J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, Vol. 113, Issue 8, pp. 1208–1225, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:8(1208).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, J. O., Yang, Y. S., and Ruy, W. S. (2002). “A comparative study on reliability-index and target-performance-based probabilistic structural design optimization.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 80, Nos. 3-4, pp. 257–269, DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00006-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu, P. L. and Kiureghian, A. D. (1986). “Optimization algorithms for structural reliability analysis.” Report no. UCB/SESM-86/09, Department of Civil Engineering, Division of Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
- Liu, P. L. and Kiureghian, A. D. (1991). “Optimization algorithms for structural reliability.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 161–177, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Z. H., Zhao, Y. G., and Ang, A. H. S. (2010). “Estimation of load and resistance factors based on the fourth Moment method.” Struct. Eng. Mech., Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 19–36, DOI: 10.12989/sem.2010.36. 1.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luo, Y., Zhan, K., and Li, A. (2009). “Structural reliability assessment based on probability and convex set mixed model.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 87, No. 21, pp. 1408–1415, DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maes, M. A., Breitung, K., and Dupuis, D. J. (1993). “Asymptotic importance sampling.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 167–183, DOI: 10.1016/0167-4730(93)90001-H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mahadevan, S. and Shi, P. (2001). “Multiple linearization method for nonlinear reliability analysis.” ASCE J. Eng. Mech., Vol. 127, No. 11, pp. 1165–1173 (2001), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001) 127:11(1165).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rackwitz, R. (2001). “Reliability analysis-a review and some perspectives.” Struct. Saf., Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 365–395, DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00009-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rackwitz, R. and Fiessler, B. (1978). “Structural reliability under combined random load sequences.” Camput. Struct., Vol. 9, Issue 5, pp. 489–494, DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Ranganathan, R. (2000). Structural reliability: analysis and design, Jico Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Roudak, M. A., Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., and Karamloo, M. (2017a). “A new three-phase algorithm for computation of reliability index and its application in structural mechanics.” Mech. Res. Commun. (In Press), DOI: 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.08.008.Google Scholar
- Roudak, M. A., Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., and Karamloo, M. (2017b). “A robust approximation method for nonlinear cases of structural reliability analysis.” Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol. 133C, pp. 11–20, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubinstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, Wiley, New York, NY.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Schueller, G. I. (2009), “Efficient Monte Carlo simulation procedures in structural uncertainty and reliability analysis-recent advances.” Struct. Eng. Mech., Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 1–20, DOI: 10.12989/sem. 2009.32.1.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., and Roudak, M. A. (2017). “An efficient reliability algorithm for locating design point using the combination of importance sampling concepts and response surface method.” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., Vol. 47, pp. 223–237, DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., and Roudak, M. A. (2017a). “Locating design point in structural reliability analysis by introduction of a control parameter and moving limited regions.” Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol. 126, pp. 196–202, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, L. P. and Grandhi, R. V. (1996). “Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 59, Issue 6, pp. 1139–1148, DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949 (96)00291-X.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- Yang, D. (2010). “Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method.” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., Vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 3131–3141, DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.018.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar