Skip to main content
Log in

Value Rating Model for Intangible Assets in Civil Engineering Consulting Firms in Korea

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

The enterprise value of a company is the book value of equity plus undisclosed value, often referred to as the “premium to book value.” A firm’s book value comprises its equity and liabilities as stated on a balance sheet. A number of schemes for the classification of intangibles have been developed to identify a firm’s overall intangible assets, which comprise disclosed intangible assets on a balance sheet and undisclosed value. The civil engineering consulting industry is a representative knowledge-based industry that features a large proportion of intangible assets among total company assets. No comprehensive classification scheme or evaluation method for overall intangible assets has yet been developed for Korean civil engineering consulting firms. To fill this gap, we develop a multifaceted value rating model of intangible assets with appropriate metric scales and indicators, which closely mirrors the metric scales used by Standard & Poor’s and other reputable credit rating services. This study evaluates the intangible assets of Korean civil engineering consulting firms using the value rating model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, T. A. and Ali, A. (1999). “Intellectual capital.” 3rd European Cont., Paper presented at International Joint Symposium on Business Administration, Turkey, pp. 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R. N. (1965). “Planning and control systems: Framework for analysis.” Graduate School of Business Administration Harvard University, Boston, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand Finance (2009). Global intangible finance tracker 2009, Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital, Cengage Learning (EMEA), UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Data Analysis, Retrieval and Transfer System (DART) (2008). Financial Supervisory Services, Seoul, Korea, https://doi.org/dart.fss.or.kr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. and Drucker, P. F. (1994). Post-capitalist society, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower, Harper Collins, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-enz, J. (2000). The ROI of human capital: Measuring the economic value of employee performance, Amacom, New York, N.Y., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-enz, J. (2010). The new HR analytics. Predicting the economic value of your company’s human capital investments, American Management Association, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haanes, K. and Lowendahl, B. (1997). The unit of activity: Towards an alternative to the theories of the firm, Strategy, Structure and Style, Wiley, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (1998). The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction, Study 7, IFAC, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). “The balanced scorecard–measures that drives performance.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 71–79. DOI: 10.1225/92105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody’s Investors Service (2007). Rating Methodology: Global Construction Methodology, Online report, https://doi.org/www.moodys.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1996). The knowledge-based economy, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phi, S. W., Hur, Y. R., and Seo, J. W. (2013). “Classification of factors for intangible asset valuation of construction engineering consulting firm.” Korea Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J. and Phillips, P. P. (2007). Show me the money: How to determine ROI in people, projects, and programs, Berrett-Koehler., San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, P. and James, G. (2000). “Intellectual capital literature review.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 1, pp. 155–176. DOI: 10.1108/14691930010348731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. A. (1997). Trying to grasp the intangible, Fortune (October 2), Ny, US, pp. 157–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organisational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge based assets, Berrett Koehler, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H. P., Plowman, D., and Hancock, P. (2008). “The evolving research on intellectual capital.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 585–608. DOI: 10.1108/14691930810913177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riho Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phi, S., Seo, J. & Lee, R. Value Rating Model for Intangible Assets in Civil Engineering Consulting Firms in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 4719–4731 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1695-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-1695-7

Keywords

Navigation