KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 184–194 | Cite as

Progressive collapse assessment of multistory reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic actions

  • Ahmed Elshaer
  • Hatem Mostafa
  • Hamed Salem
Geotechnical Engineering


Progressive collapse is a catastrophic partial or total failure of a structure that mostly occurs when a structure loses a primary component like a column. Some international standards have started to consider progressive collapse resistance in various approaches. In this study, the ‘Unified Facilities Criterion’ guidelines were used in assessing the structure; these guidelines represent one of the codes that discuss progressive collapse using sophisticated approaches. Three-dimensional nonlinear dynamic analyses using the ‘Applied Element Method’ were performed for a structure that lost a column during a seismic action. A parametric study was made to investigate the effect of different parameters on progressive collapse. In this study, a primary structural component was assumed lost during an earthquake. The studied parameters were the location of the removed column in plan, the level of the removed column, the case of loading, and the consideration of the slabs. For the study cases, it was concluded that the buildings designed according to the Egyptian code satisfies the progressive collapse requirements stated by ‘Unified Facilities Criteria’ (UFC) guidelines requirements with a safety factor of 1.97. Also, it was found that losing a column during a seismic action is more critical for progressive collapse than under gravity load. Finally, this study elaborated the importance of considering the slab in progressive collapse analysis of multistory buildings in order to include the significant catenary action developed by the slabs.


progressive collapse seismic loads applied elements catenary action UFC 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ASCE/SEI 41-06 (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  2. ASCE/SEI 7-05 (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil EngineersGoogle Scholar
  3. Bathe, K. (1982). Solution of equilibrium equations in dynamic analysis, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Chopra, A. (1995). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. EC (2007). The egyptian code for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures, Cairo, Egypt.Google Scholar
  6. ELS (2014). Extreme Loading for Structures, Available from: [Accessed May].Google Scholar
  7. Galal, K. and El-Sawy, T. (2010). “Effect of retrofit strategies on mitigating progressive collapse of steel frame structures.” J. Construct Steel Res, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 520–31, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helmy, H., Salem, H., and Tageldin, H. (2009). Numerical simulation of charlotte coliseum demolition using the applied element method, USNCCM-10 conference-Ohio-USA.Google Scholar
  9. Helmy, H., Salem, H., and Mourad, S. (2012). “Progressive collapse assessment of framed reinforced concrete structures according to ufc guidelines for alternative path method.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 42, pp. 127–141, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maekawa, K. and Okamura, H. (1983). “The deformational behavior and constitutive equation of concrete using the elasto-plastic and fracture model.” J. Faculty Eng. Univ. Tokyo (B), Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 253–328.Google Scholar
  11. Park, H., Suk, C., and Kim, S. (2009). “Collapse modeling of model RC structures using the applied element method.” J. Korean Soc. Roc. Mech. Tunnel Undergr Space, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 43–51.Google Scholar
  12. Ristic, D., Yamada, Y., and Iemura, H. (1986). Stress–strain based modeling of hysteretic structures under earthquake induced bending and varying axial loads, Research report No. 86-ST-01, School of Civil Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  13. Salem, H., El-Fouly, A., and Tagel-Din, H. (2011). “Toward an economic design of reinforced concrete structures against progressive collapse.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 33, No. 33, pp. 3341–3350, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.06.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salem, H. (2011). “Computer-aided design of framed reinforced concrete structures subjected to flood scouring.” Journal of American Science, Vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 191–200. [].Google Scholar
  15. Sasani, M. and Sagiroglu, S. (2008). “Progressive collapse resistance of hotel San Diego.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 134, No. 3, pp. 478–88, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:3(478).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasani, M. (2008). “Response of a reinforced concrete infilled-frame structure to removal of two adjacent columns.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 30, pp. 2478–2491, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.019. Simqke_GR. v.2.7. Available from: [Accessed May, 2014].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tagel-Din, H. and Meguro, K. (2000). “Applied element method for dynamic large deformations analysis of structures.” Struct. Eng. Earthquake Eng. Int. J. Jpn. Soc. Civil Eng. (JSCE), Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 215s–24s, [].Google Scholar
  18. Tagel-Din, H. and Rahman, N. (2004). “Extreme loading: Breaks through finite element barriers.” Struct Eng., Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 32–40.Google Scholar
  19. UFC, 4-023-03 (2009). Unified Facilities Criteria, Department of Defense, Design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Wibowo, H., Reshotkina, S., and Lau, D. (2009). Modelling progressive collapse of RC bridges during earthquakes, CSCE annual general conference. GC-176-1-11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Structural Engineering Dept.Cairo UniversityGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations