Pore size distribution of cement mortar prepared with crushed limestone sand
- 195 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Recently, the use of crushed sand obtained from limestone-quarried is growing especially in the countries where river sand is not quite available. In the paper, the results from an experimental investigation are presented, which evaluates the pore structure of mortar mixtures where fine aggregate is replaced by Crushed Limestone Sand (CLS). The behavior of pore structure of CLS mortar was compared to that of mortars prepared from Nature River Sand (NRS). A Mercury Porosimeter Intrusion (MIP) is adopted to study the behavior of pore size distribution. Both CLS and NRS mortar with four water-cement ratios and five sand-cement ratios are used to determine pore structure. An analytical model was established to compare changes in pore structure for different water cement ratio and volume of sand, and the model was based on the test results.
Keywords
cement mortar pore structure experimental crushed limestone sandPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aly, T. and Sanjayan, J. (2010). “Effect of pore-size distribution on shrinkage of concretes.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 525–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, X., Wu, S., and Zhou, J. (2013). “Influence of porosity on compressive and tensile strength of cement mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 869–874.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Collins, F. and Sanjayan, J. G. (2000). “Effect of pore size distribution on drying shrinking of alkali-activated slag concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1401–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cook, R. A. and Hover, K. C. (1993). “Mercury porosimetry of cementbased materials and associated correction factors.” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cook, R. A. and Hover, K. C. (1999). “Mercury porosimetry of hardened cement pastes.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diamond, S. and Dolch, W. L. (1972). “Generalized log-normal distribution of pore sizes in hydrated cement paste.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 234–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feldman, R. F. (1984). “Pore structure damage in blended cements caused by mercury intrusion.” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gonen, T., Yazicioglu, S., and Demirel, B. (2015). “The influence of freezing-thawing cycles on the capillary water absorption and porosity of concrete with mineral admixture.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, K SCE, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gunnink, B. (1991). “New method for measuring pore size distributions in concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jeong, J., Zollinger, D., Lim, J., and Park, J. (2012). “Age and moisture effects on thermal expansion of concrete pavement slabs.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jiang, J., Sun, G., and Wang, C. (2013). “Numerical calculation on the porosity distribution and diffusion coefficient of interfacial transition zone in cement-based composite materials.” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 134–138.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kayyali, O. (1989). “Strength and porosity of Portland cement paste subjected to chloride penetration.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Khatib, J. M. and Wild, S. (1996). “Pore size distribution of metakaolin paste.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1545–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumar, R. and Bhattacharjee, B. (2003). “Porosity, pore size distribution and in situ strength of concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maslehuddin, M., Sharif, A. M., Shameem, M., Ibrahim, M., and Barry, M. S. (2003). “Comparison of properties of steel slag and crushed limestone aggregate concretes.” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menadi, S., Kenai, S., Khatib, J., and Ait-Mokhtar, A. (2009). “Strength and durability of concrete incorporating crushed limestone sand.” Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moukwa, M. and Aitcin, P. C. (1988). “The effect of drying on cement pastes pore structure as determined by mercury porosimetry.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rukzon, S. and Chindaprasirt, P. (2014). “Use of ternary blend of Portland cement and two pozzolans to improve durability of highstrength concrete.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, K SCE, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 1745–1752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scrivener, K. L. and Nemati, K. M. (1996). “The percolation of pore space in the cement paste/aggregate interfacial zone of concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stark, J. (2011). “Recent advances in the field of cement hydration and microstructure analysis.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 666–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, A., Zhang, C., and Zhang, N. (1999). “The theoretic analysis of the influence of the particle size distribution of cement system on the property of cement.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 29, No. 11, pp. 1721–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, J., Weissinger, E. A., Peethamparan, S., and Scherer, G. W. (2010). “Early hydration and setting of oil well cement.” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1023–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhou, J., Ye, G., and van Breugel, K. (2010). “Characterization of pore structure in cement-based materials using pressurization–depressurization cycling mercury intrusion porosimetry (PDC-MIP).” Cem. Concr. Res., Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar