KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 1757–1766 | Cite as

Simplified model and seismic response of integrated nuclear containment system based on frequency adaptive lumped-mass stick modeling approach

  • Huseok Lee
  • Yu-Chen Ou
  • Hwasung Roh
  • Jong Seh LeeEmail author
Structural Engineering


Finite element analysis based on solid elements can be used in the seismic analysis of integrated nuclear containment systems, which include structural components (nuclear containment building) and non-structural components (reactor vessel, steam generator, etc.). However, this solid element based FE modeling requires long computational times or high costs to acquire the analysis results; this is due to the large number of nodes and the resulting large matrix during the integration and assembly of all elements. These long computational times present several difficulties for seismic engineers in the preliminary design steps since the large number of earthquake data are used in the analysis and several design parameters need be changed. This paper presents a new simplified modeling technique for an integrated nuclear containment system, named “frequency adaptive Lumped Mass Stick (LMS) model”. This technique consists of a smaller number of stick elements and lumped masses, and it determines the amount of lumped masses to be identical to the frequencies of the original or actual structures. The frequency adaptive LMS modeling technique is applied to all structural and non-structural components of the nuclear containment building system. The integrated system is obtained considering the connecting boundary conditions of each component. Seismic analysis of the integrated system is performed using the simplified model and the results are compared to those of the solid based finite element model.


integrated nuclear containment system non-structural components simplified model frequency adaptive lumped mass finite element model seismic response 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahn, K. I., Park, S. Y., Cho, S.W. (2006). “MELCOR 1.8.4 sensitivity analysis of the severe accident evolution during the APR 1400 LOCA.” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 33, No.1, pp. 71–83, DOI:  10.1016/j.anucene.2005.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bose, M. K., Soni, R. S., Mahajan, S. C., Kakodkar, A. (1996). “Strain energy concept for developing lumped mass stick mode of complex structures.” Proceeding of 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 1507.Google Scholar
  3. Cho, S. G. Joe, Y. H. (2005). “Seismic fragility analyses of nuclear power plant structures based on the recorded earthquake data in Korea.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 235, Nos. 17–19, pp. 1867–1874, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.05.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choi, I., Choun, Y., Ahn, S., Seo, J. (2008). “Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure for near-fault earthquakes.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 238, No. 6, pp. 1382–1391, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra, A. K. (2006). Dynamics of structures, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., D’Ambrisi, A., De_Stefano, M. (2011). “Fragility analysis and seismic record selection.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 3, pp. 379–390, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943–541X.0000115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan, F. Ahmadi, G. (1990). “Floor response spectra for base-isolated multi-storey structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 377–388, DOI:  10.1002/eqe.4290190307.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirama, T., Goto, M., Hasegawa, T., Kanechika, M., Kei, T., Mieda, T., Abe, H., Takiguchi, K., and Akiyama, H. (2005). “Seismic proof test of a Reinforced Concrete Containment Vessel (RCCV): Part 1: Test model and pressure test.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 235, No. 13, pp. 1335–1348, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang, Y. N., Whittaker, A. S., Luco, N. (2010). “Seismic performance assessment of base-isolated safety-related nuclear structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 13, pp. 1421–1442, DOI:  10.1002/eqe.1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeremiœ, B., Tafazzoli, N., Ancheta, T., Orboviœ, N., Blahoianu, A. (2013). “Seismic behavior of NPP structures subjected to realistic 3D, inclined seismic motions, in variable layered soil/rock, on surface or embedded foundations.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 265, pp. 85–94, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, N. Song, K. (1999). “Seismic capability evaluation of the prestressed: Reinforced concrete containment, Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant Units 5 and 6.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 129, No. 3, pp. 367–379, DOI:  10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00108-9.Google Scholar
  12. Leonardo, T. S., Richard, S. O., Sener, T., Diego, P. R. (2007). “Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 237, Nos. 12–13, pp. 1474–1485, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.10.006.Google Scholar
  13. Paskalov, A., Saudy, A., Elgohary, M. (2007). “Response of ACR-1000TM nuclear power plant to eastern north America high frequency input motions.” Proceeding 19th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMIRT-19), Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Regulatory Guide (1973). Design response spectra for seismic design of nuclear power plants, Regulatory Guide 1.60-revision 1.0, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Regulatory Guide (1974). Instrumentation for earthquakes, Regulatory Guide 1.12, revision 1.0, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Reinhorn, A. M., Lavan, O., Cimellaro, G. P. (2009). “Design of controlled elastic and inelastic structures.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 469–479, DOI:  10.1007/s11803-009-9126-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roh, H., Lee, H., Lee. J. S. (2013). “New lumped-mass stick model based on modal characteristics of structures: development and application to nuclear containment building.” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 307–317, DOI:  10.1007/s11803-013-0173-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryu, J., Seo, C., Kim, J., Yun, C. (2010). “Seismic response analysis of soil-structure interactive system using a coupled three-dimensional FE-IE method.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 240, No. 8, pp. 1949–1966, DOI:  10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.03.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Seo, J. T. (2011). Experience on APR1400 construction, IAEA TWG-LWR, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  20. Standard Review Plan-Section 3.7.1. (2007). “Seismic design parameters.” NUREG-0800, U.S. NRC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Varma, V., Reddy, G. R., Vaze, K. K., Kushwaha, H. S. (2002). “Simplified approach for seismic analysis of structures.” International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 207225, DOI:  10.1142/S021945540200052X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Varpasuo, P. (1996). “The seismic reliability of VVER-1000 NPP prestressed containment building.” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 160, No. 3, pp. 387–398, DOI:  10.1016/0029-5493(95)01116-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huseok Lee
    • 1
  • Yu-Chen Ou
    • 2
  • Hwasung Roh
    • 3
  • Jong Seh Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Dept. of Civil and Environmental EngineeringHanyang UniversityAnsanKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil and Construction EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipei City 106Taiwan
  3. 3.Dept. of Civil EngineeringChonbuk National UniversityJeonjuKorea

Personalised recommendations