KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 887–897 | Cite as

The relationship between communication and construction safety climate in China

  • Pin-Chao Liao
  • Guangpu Lei
  • Dongping Fang
  • Wei Liu
Construction Management
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Cultivating a good safety climate is critical to the improvement of safety performance in construction. Previous research has demonstrated that communication is important in strengthening the safety climate. However, few studies have addressed the role of jobsite communication in safety or investigated its relationship with the safety climate. Attempts to optimize communication to improve the safety climate appear to lack both adequate theoretical and empirical bases, as well as consensus on its importance. Therefore, this study identifies the relationship between communication and construction safety climate. The authors surveyed four subcontractors employed on two construction projects, which were administered by different Chinese state-owned enterprises. Models of the safety communication structure and safety climate were developed through social network analysis. Interviews were conducted to confirm and summarize the findings. The results indicate that a positive safety climate could be associated with higher communication density and degree centrality, as well as with lower betweenness centrality. To enhance the jobsite safety climate, this study recommends the following best practices: (1) Construction safety leaders (e.g., site managers) should communicate more frequently with construction workers when high organizational centrality is detected. (2) Additional communication channels should be established to bridge communication gaps among individuals. The findings validate the importance of communication as a way to manage the safety climate of Chinese construction projects.

Keywords

safety climate communication social network analysis construction 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alba, R. D. (1982). “Taking stock of network analysis: A decade’s results.” Research Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 1, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis, Harvard: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Boyd, D. M. and Ellison, N. B. (2007). “Social network sites: Denition, history, and scholarship.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 210–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, D. and Xiao, H. (2010). “Understanding chinese and british construction: a problem of metaphors.” Proc. 26th Annual Conf. of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010, September 6, 2010–September 8, 2010, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM, Leeds, United Kingdom, pp. 371–380.Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, D. and Harary, F. (1956). “Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory.” Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chinowsky, P., Diekmann, J., and Galotti, V. (2008). “Social network model of construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 134, No. 10, pp. 804–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinowsky, P. S., Diekmann, J., and O’Brien, J. (2010). “Project organizations as social networks.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 452–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cigularov, K., Chen, P., and Rosecrance, J. (2010). “The effects of error management climate and safety communication on safety: A multilevel study.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1498–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, M. D. and Phillips, R. A. (2004). “Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship.” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Denison, D. R. (1996). “What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A natives point of view on a decade of paradigm wars.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 619–654.Google Scholar
  11. Ding, R. G., Liu, F., Sun, T., and Sun, H. (2010). “The study on project governance based on social network analysis–An example of large construction project supervision.” China Soft Science, Vol. 6, pp. 132–140.Google Scholar
  12. Edelson, J., Neitzel, R., Meischke, H., Daniell, W., Sheppard, L., Stover, B., and Seixas, N. (2009). “Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.” Annals of Occupational Hygiene, Vol. 53, pp. 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evia, C. (2011). “Localizing and designing computer-based safety training solutions for Hispanic construction workers.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 6, pp. 452–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang, D., Chen, Y., and Wong, L. (2006). “Safety climate in construction industry: A case study in Hong Kong.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, No. 6, pp. 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fang, D., Huang, X., and Hinze, J. (2005). Construction safety management, Water & Power Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  16. Gadd, S. (2002). Safety culture-A review of the literature, HSL Shefeld, U.K.Google Scholar
  17. Guldenmund, F. W. (2000). “The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research.” Safety Science, Vol. 34, Nos. 1–3, pp. 215–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). “Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange.” Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 323–342.Google Scholar
  19. Hofmann, D. A. and Morgeson, F. P. (1999). “Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, S. and Hickey, S. (2004). Improving driver/signaler safety critical communications — Report on conduct surveys, Technical report 10/TO14/AEAR/49/TRT, AEA Technology Rail, Derby, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  21. Katsanis, C. J. (2006). “Network organizations: Structural and strategic implications.” Proc. 2nd Specialty Conf. on Leadership and Management in Construction, PM Publishing, Louisville, CO, pp. 108–115.Google Scholar
  22. Katzenbach, J. and Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams, Havard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Kines, P., Andersenb, LPS., Spangenberga, S., Mikkelsena, KL., Dyreborga, J., and Zoharc, D. (2010). “Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication.” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  25. Krebs, V. E. (2004). Managing the connected organization, August 1, 2009, www.orgnet.com.Google Scholar
  26. Lan, H. (2010). “Application of information tracking in construction safety management.” Operative Economy & Science, Vol. 2, pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
  27. Li, P., Xi, Y., and Yao, X. (2008). “Where does help come from: A case study of network analysis in an academic group.” Connections, Vol. 28, pp. 73–87.MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang, C., Zhi-ri, L., and Xi, L. (2005). “The demonstration of enterpirise interior communication and organization reengineering.” Journal of Central South University (Social Science), Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 640–645.Google Scholar
  29. Liu, W. H. (2008). “Construction safety management requires coordination between communication and organization.” Electric Safety Technology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
  30. Loosemore, M. and Andonakis, N. (2007). “Barriers to implementing OHS reforms — The experiences of small subcontractors in the Australian construction industry.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M., and Flin, R. (2003). “Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments.” Safety Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 641–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moreno, J. L. (1960). The sociometry reader, The Free Press, Glencoe, IL.Google Scholar
  33. Morton, S. C., Dainty, A. R. J., Burns, N. D., Brookes, N. J., and Backhouse, C. J. (2006). “Managing relationships to improve performance: A case study in the global aerospace industry.” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, No. 16, pp. 3227–3241.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Neal, A., Grifn, M. A., and Hart, P. M. (2000). “The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior.” Safety Science, Vol. 34, Nos. 1–3, pp. 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson, S. (2007). “Managing the risk of subcontractor defaults.” Proc. the State Bar of Texas Construction Law Section’s 20th Annual Construction Law Conf., March 1, San Antonio, Texas.Google Scholar
  36. Park, J. (2011). “The use of a social network analysis technique to investigate the characteristics of crew communications in nuclear power plants — A feasibility study.” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 96, No. 10, pp. 1275–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., and Fong, D. (1999). “Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider, B. (1987). “The people make the place.” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 437–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, J. and Levitt, R. (2004). Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries, Project Management Institute, Newton Square, PA.Google Scholar
  41. Urban, J. (1996). “Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: Implications for complex team decision making.” Human Factors, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (2005). Investigation report of refinery explosion and fire for Bp, Washington, DC, www.csb.gov/bp-america-refinery-explosion/ Google Scholar
  43. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, S. and Song, S. (2009). “A study of safety communication issues based on Johari Window.” Electric Safety Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
  45. Xie, F. (2003). Research on construction safety performance measurement, Master’s Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  46. Xue-sheng, D., En-yuan, W., Xue-qiu, H., Li, L., and Da-zhao, S. (2009). “The role of effective communication of safety information in enhancing safety culture.” China Safety Science Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 78–84.Google Scholar
  47. Zhang, H., Chen, J., Jia, G., and Mao, R. (2009). “The performance setting for construction project based on social network analysis.” Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 21, No. 21, pp. 176–180.Google Scholar
  48. Zohar, D. (2010). “Thirty years of safety climate research: Reflections and future directions.” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 1517–1522.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pin-Chao Liao
    • 1
  • Guangpu Lei
    • 1
  • Dongping Fang
    • 1
  • Wei Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Construction ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.China State Construction Engineering CorporationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations