Integrated flood risk analysis in a changing climate: A case study from the Korean Han River Basin
- 333 Downloads
This research performed a case study to develop an integrated Flood Risk Index (FRI) considering hydrologic, socio-economic, and ecological components to assess watershed-based flood hazards and vulnerability in the Korean Han River Basin, where flood disasters frequently occur. We used fifteen indicators, which were standardized, weighted, and classified, to create an FRI map. Five categories of flood risk were distinguished: “very high”, “high”, “medium”, “low”, and “very low”. The results in ternary diagrams, illustrating the relative importance of the three components show that urban areas in the Korean Han River Basin have experienced a decrease of 1.0% in terms of the hydrologic component. However, the socio-economic and ecological components have increased by 3.2% and 4.4%, respectively. In rural areas, an increase of 4.8% was found in the hydrologic component alongside decreases in the socio-economic (1.6%) and ecological (2.2%) factors. In addition, the FRI map shows that 20.02% of the total area of the Han River Basin is classified as having “very high” or “high” flood risk; the size of this high-risk zone has increased significantly, by 7.12, since 1990. Despite the relatively small sample size and lack of data, the results presented here provide a quantified assessment of Han River flood risk combined with an integrated view of risk assessment and management for stakeholders and decision-makers.
Keywordsflood risk index hazard vulnerability han river basin
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M., and Wilks, A. R. (1988). The news language, Wadsworth & Brooks/ Cole.Google Scholar
- Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
- Chang, H. J. and Kwon, W. T. (2007). “Spatial variations of summer precipitation trends in South Korea, 1973–2005.” Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 2, Nos. 1–9, DOI: 10.1099/1748-9326/2/4/045012.
- Crichton, D. (1999). “The risk triangle.” Natural Disaster Management, Tudor Rose, London, pp. 102–103.Google Scholar
- Du, J., He, F., and Shi, P. J. (2006). “Integrated flood risk assessment of Xiangjiang River Basin in China.” Ziran Zaihai Xuebao/Journal of Natural Disasters, Vol. 15, No. 6 pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
- Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R., Turner, B. L., Hsieh, W., and Schiller, A., (2005). “Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Kasperson eds., The social contours of risk. Volume II: Risk analysis, corporations & the globalization of risk.” London Earthscan, pp. 245–285.Google Scholar
- KMA (The Korean Meteorological Administration) (2012). URL: http://kma.go.kr (Accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
- Maskrey, A. (1989). Disaster mitigation: A community based approach, Development Guidelines, Oxford, London.Google Scholar
- Shi, P. J. (2003). Natural hazard atlas of China, Science, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- UNISDR (Glossary of the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2012). URL: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng%20home.htm (Accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
- WAMIS (Water Management Information System) (2012). URL: http://wamis.go.kr/eng/ (Accessed September 2012).
- Wang, Z., Wang, K., Xiong, Y., Xu, L., and Yang, X. (2003). “Assessment of the vulnerability of flood-waterlogging disaster and countermeasures of disaster reduction in Hunan Province.” Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 586–592.Google Scholar
- Weisstein, E. W. (2012). Viviani’s theorem. From math world — A Wolfram, Web Resource: URL:http//www.mathworld.wolfram.com/ Vivianis Theorem (accessed July 2012).Google Scholar
- Zheng, N., Takara, K., Yamashiki, Y., and Tachikawa, Y. (2009). Quantitative vulnerability analysis for regional flood hazard, Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ., No. 52 B.Google Scholar