Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1563–1571 | Cite as

Integrated flood risk analysis in a changing climate: A case study from the Korean Han River Basin

  • Sun-Kwon Yoon
  • Jong-Suk Kim
  • Young-Il MoonEmail author
Water Engineering

Abstract

This research performed a case study to develop an integrated Flood Risk Index (FRI) considering hydrologic, socio-economic, and ecological components to assess watershed-based flood hazards and vulnerability in the Korean Han River Basin, where flood disasters frequently occur. We used fifteen indicators, which were standardized, weighted, and classified, to create an FRI map. Five categories of flood risk were distinguished: “very high”, “high”, “medium”, “low”, and “very low”. The results in ternary diagrams, illustrating the relative importance of the three components show that urban areas in the Korean Han River Basin have experienced a decrease of 1.0% in terms of the hydrologic component. However, the socio-economic and ecological components have increased by 3.2% and 4.4%, respectively. In rural areas, an increase of 4.8% was found in the hydrologic component alongside decreases in the socio-economic (1.6%) and ecological (2.2%) factors. In addition, the FRI map shows that 20.02% of the total area of the Han River Basin is classified as having “very high” or “high” flood risk; the size of this high-risk zone has increased significantly, by 7.12, since 1990. Despite the relatively small sample size and lack of data, the results presented here provide a quantified assessment of Han River flood risk combined with an integrated view of risk assessment and management for stakeholders and decision-makers.

Keywords

flood risk index hazard vulnerability han river basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anselmo, V., Galeati, G., Palmieri, S., Rossi, U., and Todini, E. (1996). “Flood risk assessment using an integrated hydrological and hydraulic modelling approach: A case study.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 175, No. 1, pp. 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bae, D. H., Jung, I. W., and Chang, H. (2008). “Long-term trend of precipitation and runoff in Korean River Basins.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 22, No. 14, pp. 2644–2656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, R. A., Chambers, J. M., and Wilks, A. R. (1988). The news language, Wadsworth & Brooks/ Cole.Google Scholar
  4. Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chang, H. J. (2008). “Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River Basin, South Korea.” Water Research, Vol. 42, No. 13, pp. 3285–3304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, H. J., Franczyk, J., and Kim, C. (2009). “What is responsible for increasing flood risks? The case of Gangwon Province, Korea.” Natural Hazards, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang, H. J. and Kwon, W. T. (2007). “Spatial variations of summer precipitation trends in South Korea, 1973–2005.” Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 2, Nos. 1–9, DOI:  10.1099/1748-9326/2/4/045012.
  8. Chung, Y. S., Yoon, M. B., and Kim, H. S. (2004). “On climate variations and changes observed in South Korea.” Climatic Change, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crichton, D. (1999). “The risk triangle.” Natural Disaster Management, Tudor Rose, London, pp. 102–103.Google Scholar
  10. Du, J., He, F., and Shi, P. J. (2006). “Integrated flood risk assessment of Xiangjiang River Basin in China.” Ziran Zaihai Xuebao/Journal of Natural Disasters, Vol. 15, No. 6 pp. 38–44.Google Scholar
  11. Fedeski, M. and Gwilliam, J. (2007). “Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: The development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung, I. W., Chang, H. J., and Bae, D. H. (2013). “Spatially-explicit assessment of flood risk caused by climate change in South Korea.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 233–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasperson, J., Kasperson, R., Turner, B. L., Hsieh, W., and Schiller, A., (2005). “Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Kasperson eds., The social contours of risk. Volume II: Risk analysis, corporations & the globalization of risk.” London Earthscan, pp. 245–285.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, J. S. and Jain, S. (2011). “Precipitation trends over the Korean peninsula: Typhoon-induced changes and a typology for characterizing climate-related risk.” Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 6, No. 3, 034033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, J. S., Jain, S., and Moon, Y. I. (2011). “Atmospheric teleconnectionbased conditional streamflow distributions for the Han River and its sub-watersheds in Korea.” International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1466–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J. S., Jain, S., and Yoon, S. K. (2012b). “Warm season streamflow variability in the Korean Han River Basin: Links with atmospheric teleconnections.” International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 635–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, H. J., Lee, J. W., Yoon, K. S., and Cho, Y. S. (2012a). “Numerical analysis of flood risk change due to obstruction.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. KMA (The Korean Meteorological Administration) (2012). URL: http://kma.go.kr (Accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
  19. Lim, K. S. and Lee, D. R. (2009). “The spatial MCDA approach for evaluating flood damage reduction alternatives.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lord, E. (1950). “Power of the modified t-test (u-test) based on range.” Biometrika, Vol. 37, Nos. 1–2, pp. 64–77.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Maskrey, A. (1989). Disaster mitigation: A community based approach, Development Guidelines, Oxford, London.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, V., Scheuer, S., and Haase, D. (2009). “A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde River, Germany.” Natural Hazards, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ni, J., Sun, L., Li, T., Huang, Z., and Borthwick, A. G. L. (2010). “Assessment of flooding impacts in terms of sustainability in mainland China.” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 91, No. 10, pp. 1930–1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nirupama, N. and Simonovic, S. P. (2007). “Increase of flood risk due to urbanisation: A Canadian example.” Natural Hazards, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rossi, G., Harmancioglu, N., and Yevjevich, V. (1994). Coping with floods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi, P. J. (2003). Natural hazard atlas of China, Science, Beijing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  27. Shi, P. J., Ge, Y., Yuan, Y., and Guo, W. P. (2005). “Integrated risk management of flood disasters in metropolitan areas of China.” Water Resources Development, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 613–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sinaga, T. P. T., Nugroho, A., Lee, Y. W., and Suh, Y. (2011). “GIS mapping of tsunami vulnerability: Case study of the Jembrana Regency in Bali, Indonesia.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teng, W. H., Hsu, M. H., Wu, C. H., and Chen, A. S. (2006). “Impact of flood disasters on Taiwan in the last quarter century.” Natural Hazards, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNISDR (Glossary of the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction) (2012). URL: http://www.unisdr.org/eng/library/lib-terminology-eng%20home.htm (Accessed October 2012).Google Scholar
  31. WAMIS (Water Management Information System) (2012). URL: http://wamis.go.kr/eng/ (Accessed September 2012).
  32. Wang, Y., Li, Z., Tang, Z., and Zeng, G. (2011). “A GIS-based spatial multi-criteria approach for flood risk assessment in the Dongting Lake Region, Hunan, Central China.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 25, No. 13, pp. 3465–3484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, Z., Wang, K., Xiong, Y., Xu, L., and Yang, X. (2003). “Assessment of the vulnerability of flood-waterlogging disaster and countermeasures of disaster reduction in Hunan Province.” Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 586–592.Google Scholar
  34. Weisstein, E. W. (2012). Viviani’s theorem. From math world — A Wolfram, Web Resource: URL:http//www.mathworld.wolfram.com/ Vivianis Theorem (accessed July 2012).Google Scholar
  35. Zheng, N., Takara, K., Yamashiki, Y., and Tachikawa, Y. (2009). Quantitative vulnerability analysis for regional flood hazard, Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst. Kyoto Univ., No. 52 B.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Research DepartmentAPEC Climate CenterBusanKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil EngineeringUniversity of SeoulSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations