KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 769–776 | Cite as

Overall cost optimization of prestressed concrete bridge using genetic algorithm

  • Zekeriya Aydın
  • Yusuf Ayvaz
Research Paper


Overall cost optimization of Prestressed Concrete (PC) bridges is investigated in this study. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum span number and optimum cross-sectional properties of multi-span bridges. Considered bridge superstructure is constituted by adjacent simply supported pretensioned prestressed I-girders. Also, considered bridge substructure is constituted by single-column piers and rectangular spread footings. Span number, cross-section dimensions of prestressed girders and the area of Prestressing Steel (PS) are considered as design variables. PC girders, piers and footings are designed according to AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges. A modified hybrid Genetic Algorithm (GA) is used for the optimum design. Working stress, ultimate strength, ductility limits, deflection, and geometry constraints are considered. Total cost of the bridge is taken as optimality criterion. A computer program is coded to perform optimum design and numerical examples from the application are designed. One of these examples is used in this paper. It is concluded that GA can be effectively used in the overall cost optimization of PC bridges.


prestressed concrete genetic algorithm optimization bridge 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AASHTO (2002). Standard specifications for highway bridges, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Aydın, Z. (2006). Optimum design of prestressed concrete bridge girders using genetic algorithm, PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.Google Scholar
  3. Aydın, Z. and Ayvaz, Y. (2010). “Optimum topology and shape design of prestressed concrete bridge girders using a genetic algorithm.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 151–162.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayvaz, Y. and Aydın, Z. (2000). “Optimum design of trusses using a genetic algorithm.” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Engineering using Metaphors from Nature, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, M. Z. and Lounis, Z. (1994). “Optimal design of structural concrete bridge systems.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 120, No. 9, pp. 2653–2674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daloğlu, A. and Aydın, Z. (1999). “Kafes sistemlerin uygulamaya yönelik optimum tasarımı.” Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 951–957 (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  7. Degertekin, S. O., Saka, M. P., and Hayalioglu, M. S. (2008). “Optimal load and resistance factor design of geometrically nonlinear steel space frames via tabu search and genetic algorithm.” Eng. Struct., Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emay International Eng. Cons. Co. (1998). Uzunçay r baraj varyant yolu dinar köprüsü uygulama projesi hesaplar, stanbul (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  9. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., New York, N. Y.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
  11. Jenkins, W. M. (1992). “Plane frame optimum design environment based on genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 118, No. 11, pp. 3103–3112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones, H. L. (1985). “Minimum cost prestressed concrete beam design.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 111, No. 11, pp. 2464–2478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kameshki, E. S. and Saka, M. P. (2001). “Optimal design of nonlinear steel frames with semi-rigid connections using a genetic algorithm.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 79, No. 17, pp. 1593–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumaran, S. S., Muthukumaran, S., and Vinodh, S. (2010). “Optimization of friction welding of tube to tube plate using an external tool.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lounis, Z. and Cohn, M.Z. (1993). “Optimization of precast prestressed concrete bridge girder systems.” PCI J., Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 60–78.Google Scholar
  16. Lounis, Z., Mirza, M. S., and Cohn, M. Z. (1997). “Segmental and conventional precast prestressed concrete I-bridge girders.” J. Bridge. Eng., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pezeshk, S., Camp, C. V., and Clem, D. (2000). “Design of nonlinear framed structures using genetic optimization.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 126, No. 3, pp. 382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajan, S. D. (1995). “Sizing, shapes and topology design optimization of trusses using genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 121, No. 10, pp. 1480–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rajeev, S. and Krishnamoorthy, C. S. (1998). “Genetic algorithm-based methodology for design of reinforced concrete frames.” Comput.-Aided. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saka, M. P. (2007). “Optimum topological design of geometrically nonlinear single layer latticed domes using coupled genetic algorithm.” Comput. Struct., Vol. 85, Nos. 21–22, pp. 1635–1646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarma, K. C. and Adeli, H. (2000). “Fuzzy discrete multicriteria cost optimization of steel structures.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 126, No. 11, pp. 1339–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sirca, G. F. and Adeli, H. (2005). “Cost optimization of prestressed concrete bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Totres, G. G. B., Brotchie, J. F., and Cornell, C. A. (1966). “A program for the optimum design of prestressed concrete highway bridges.” PCI J., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
  24. Yu, C. H., Das Gupta, N. C., and Paul, H. (1986). “Optimization of prestressed concrete bridge girders.” Eng. Optim., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Civil EngineeringNamık Kemal UniversityÇorlu, TekirdağTurkey
  2. 2.Dept. of Civil EngineeringYıldız Technical UniversityEsenler, İstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations