KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 603–609 | Cite as

Success evaluation factors in construction project management — some evidence from medium and large Portuguese companies

  • Pedro Ribeiro
  • Anabela Paiva
  • João Varajão
  • Caroline Dominguez
Technical Note

Abstract

The construction industry plays a very important role in the Portuguese economy. In 2009, it was among the top five economic sectors, representing 13% of total employment. Nevertheless, project failures are still frequent mainly due to inadequate management practices and to the intrinsic characteristics of projects of the construction industry. Even though Portuguese construction has improved in recent years, cost and schedule overruns, low productivity and final product quality problems are still common. In this context, project management is a crucial tool for improving construction operations and for the overall success of projects. The aim of this article is to contribute to the discussion on success evaluation factors in a field where little has been written — the construction industry. Through a survey of 40 medium and large Portuguese companies several factors were identified which are currently considered in the evaluation of project success, as found in the literature review. The results show that the traditional factors, often referred to as the “Atkinson elements triangle” (cost, time and quality), are still the most relevant for evaluating the success of a project, but others, such as customer involvement and acceptance, have gained importance in recent years.

Keywords

construction industry success factors project management portuguese companies manager profile 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. (1999). “Project management: Cost, time, and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it is time to accept other success criteria.” International Journal of Project management, Elsevier, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belout, A. and Gauvreau, C. (2004). “Factors influencing project success: The impact of human resource management.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao, Y., Chau, K. W., Anson, M., and Zhang, J. P. (2002). “An intelligent decision support system in construction management by data warehousing technique.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol. 2480, pp. 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carú, A., Cova, B., and Pace, S. (2004). “Project success: Lessons from the Andrea Case.” European Management Journal, Elsevier, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 532–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, A. and Chan, A. (2004). “Key performance indicators for measuring construction success.” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Emerald, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chau, K. W. (2004). “A two-stage dynamic model on allocation of construction facilities with genetic algorithm.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 481–490.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chau, K. W., Anson, M., and Zhang, J. P. (2003). “Implementation of visualization as planning and scheduling tool in construction.” Building and Environment, Elsevier, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CII — Construction Industry Institute (2011). Knowledge management, https://www.construction-institute.org/scriptcontent/know.cfm?section=know (retrieved 10-03-2011).Google Scholar
  9. Crespo, A., Palacios, R., Acosta, P., and Mayoral, M. (2010). “A qualitative study of hard decision making in managing global software development teams.” Information Systems Management, Taylor and Francis, Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doloi, H. and Lim, M. Y. (2007). “Measuring performance in Construction Projects-A critical analysis with an australian perspective.” Proc. COBRA-RICS (Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors), London, U.K.Google Scholar
  11. FIEC and EFBWW (2008). “Joint declaration on paritarian funds.” http://www.paritarian-funds-construction.eu/content/files/Warsaw%20declaration.pdf (retrieved in 30-05-2012).Google Scholar
  12. KPMG International (2012). Global engineering and construction companies need to adapt quickly, http://www.big4.com/kpmg/kpmg-global-engineering-and-construction-companies-need-toadapt-quickly (retrieved in 30-05-2012).Google Scholar
  13. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management — A systems approach to planning, scheduling and control, 10th Edition, Wiley, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, J. P. (2007). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM (American Management Association), New York, 3rd Edition.Google Scholar
  15. Munns, A. K. and Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). “The role of project management in achieving success.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Navas, J. R. (2008). Engenharia de gestão de projectos, FCA-Editora de Informática, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen, L. D., Oguniana, S. O., and Xuan Lan, D. T. (2004). “A study on project success factors in large construction projects in vietnam.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Emerald, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paiva, A., Varajão, J., Dominguez, C., and Ribeiro, P. (2011). “Principais aspectos considerados na avaliação do sucesso de projectos de desenvolvimento.” Revista de ciência e tecnologia de Américas-Journal of Science and Technology of the Americas, Interciencia, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 200–204.Google Scholar
  19. Palacios, R. C., Caro, E. T., Crespo, A. G., and Berbis, J. M. (2010). “Identifying technical competences of it professionals. the case of software engineers.” International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology, IGI Global, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pires, B., Teixeira, J.C., and Moura, H. (2007). “Management functions and competitiveness in the Portuguese construction industry.” Proc. 25th CME (Conference Construction Management and Economics), Reading, U. K.Google Scholar
  21. PMI (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge, Project Management Institute, 4th ed.Google Scholar
  22. Ramirez, R., Alarcón, L., and Knights, P. (2004). “Benchmarking system for evaluating management practices in the construction industry.” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Roldão, V. S. (2007). Gestão de projectos — Abordagem instrumental ao Planeamento, Organização e Controlo, Monitor, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
  24. Singh, V., Gu, N., and Wang, X. (2011). “A theoretical framework of a BIM-based multi-disciplinary collaboration platform.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 134–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. TSO (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2 — PRINCE2, 5th edition, Nantwitch, U.K.Google Scholar
  26. Varajão, J., Cardoso, J., Gonçalves, D., and Cruz, J. (2008). “Análise à gestão de projectos de desenvolvimento de software em grandes empresas portuguesas.” Semana Informática, No. 904, pp. 10–12.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, H. J., Zhang, J. P., Chau, K. W., and Anson, M. (2004). “4D dynamic management for construction planning and resource utilization.” Automation in Construction, Elsevier, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. White, D. and Fortune, J. (2002). “Current practice of project management — An empirical study.” International Project Management Journal, Elsevier, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang, J., Shen G., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., and Xue, X. (2011). “Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies.” International Journal of Project Management, Elsevier, Vol. 29, Issue 7, pp. 900–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Ribeiro
    • 1
  • Anabela Paiva
    • 2
    • 3
  • João Varajão
    • 1
    • 2
  • Caroline Dominguez
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of Information SystemsUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal
  2. 2.Dept. of EngineeringUniversity of Trás-so-Montes e Alto DouroVila RealPortugal
  3. 3.University of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal

Personalised recommendations