A cell-based smoothed finite element method for three dimensional solid structures
- First Online:
This paper extends further the strain smoothing technique in finite elements to 8-noded hexahedral elements (CS-FEM-H8). The idea behind the present method is similar to the cell-based smoothed 4-noded quadrilateral finite elements (CS-FEM-Q4). In CSFEM, the smoothing domains are created based on elements, and each element can be further subdivided into 1 or several smoothing cells. It is observed that: 1) The CS-FEM using a single smoothing cell can produce higher stress accuracy, but insufficient rank and poor displacement accuracy; 2) The CS-FEM using several smoothing cells has proper rank, good displacement accuracy, but lower stress accuracy, especially for nearly incompressible and bending dominant problems. We therefore propose 1) an extension of strain smoothing to 8-noded hexahedral elements and 2) an alternative CS-FEM form, which associates the single smoothing cell issue with multi-smoothing cell one via a stabilization technique. Several numerical examples are provided to show the reliability and accuracy of the present formulation.
Keywords3D elasticity cell-based smoothed finite element (CS-FEM) convergence stabilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bordas, S., Natarajan, S., Kerfriden, P., Augarde, C. E., Mahapatra, D. R., Rabczuk, T., and Pont, S. D. (2011). “On the performance of strain smoothing for quadratic and enriched finite element approximations (XFEM/GFEM/PUFEM).” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 86, Nos. 4–5, pp. 637–666.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cugnon, F. (2000). Automatisation des calculs éléments nis dans le cadre de la méthode-p, PhD Thesis, Unv. of Liège.Google Scholar
- Fraeijs de Veubeke, B. (2001). “Displacement and equilibrium models in the finite element Method. In ‘Stress analysis’, Zienkiewicz O.C., Holister, G. (eds.) John Wiley and Sons, 1965: Chapter 9 145–197.” Reprinted in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 287–342.Google Scholar
- Johnson, C. and Mercier, B. (1979). “Some equilibrium finite element methods for two-dimensional problems in continuum mechanics.” In: Energy methods in finite element analysis. Wiley-Interscience, Chichester, Sussex, England, pp. 213–224.Google Scholar
- Kelly, D. W. (1979). “Reduced integration to give equilibrium models for assessing the accuracy of finite element analysis.” In Proceedings of Third International Conference in Australia on FEM, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Mijuca, D. and Berkovic, M. (1998). “On the efciency of the primalmixed finite element scheme.” Advances in Computational Structured Mechanics, Civil-Comp Press, pp. 61–69.Google Scholar
- Nguyen-Thoi, T., Liu, G. R., Lam, K. Y., and Zhang, G. Y. (2009). “A face-based smoothed finite element method (FS-FEM) for 3d linear and nonlinear solid mechanics problems using 4-node tetrahedral elements.” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 324–353.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richardson, L. F. (1910). “The approximate arithmetical solution by finite differences of physical problems.” Trans. Roy. Soc. (London), Vol. A210, pp. 307–357.Google Scholar
- Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N. (1987). Theory of elasticity (3rd ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar