KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 247–253 | Cite as

Decision of the water shortage mitigation policy using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

  • Si-Jung Choi
  • Joong Hoon KimEmail author
  • Dong-Ryul Lee
Water Engineering


Many regions has been facing formidable freshwater management and planning challenges. Concerns about limited water allocations, conservation of environmental and water qualities and policies for sustainable water use have been increased because rising water demand would cause water shortage in the near future. Therefore, it is necessary to look into possible alternative water resources management plans to mitigate the potential water shortage. However, it is not straightforward to predict and analyze the various situations likely to be occurred in the future. Also, finding an optimal solution among many alternatives to mitigate the water shortage is a complex task. In this study, a methodology of predicting and analyzing the water resources situations in the future using the K-WEAP (Korea Water Evaluation and Planning system) is presented and an optimal alternative is determined using the MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) that takes into account the economic, environmental, and social sectors. The proposed methodology is applied to the Nakdong River basin in South Korea to calculate water budget and possible water shortage. An optimal water shortage mitigation policy for the study basin is also suggested to help decision maker develop long-term water resources management strategies.


sustainable water supply water shortage mitigation MCDA K-WEAP Nakdong River basin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmoud, M. R., Fahmy, H., and Labadie, J. W. (2002). “Multicriteria siting and sizing of desalination facilities with geographic information system.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 128, No. 2, pp. 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belton, V. and Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. An intergrated approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Messachusetts.Google Scholar
  3. Choi, D. J. and Park, H. K. (2000). “Analysis of water privatization scenarios with mulit-criteria decision techniques.” Journal of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 175–187.Google Scholar
  4. Duckstein, L., Treichel, W., and El Magnouni, S. (1994). “Ranking ground-water management alternatives by multicriterion analysis.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 120, No. 4, pp. 546–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flug, M, Seitz, H. L. H., and Scott, J. F. (2000). “Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goicoechea, A., Stakhiv, E. Z., and Li, F. (1992). “Experimental evaluation of multiple criteria decision models for application to water resources planning.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
  7. Joubert, A. and Pollard, S. (2000). “Using multi-criteria decision analysis in catchment management: A case study of the Sand River, Mpumulanga, South Africa.” African Journal of Aquatic Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Joubert, A., Stewart, T. J., and Eberhard, R. (2003). “Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town.” Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. KMOCT (2006). National water resources plan (2006–2020), Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation.Google Scholar
  10. KMOST (2007). Building of value evaluation system of water resources and water related technology, Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, H. J. and Shim, M. P. (2002). “Decision making for priority of water allocation during drought by analytic hierarchy process.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Statistics Working Paper.Google Scholar
  13. Park, T. S. (2002). “The evaluation perspective of stream weight in AHP.” Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raskin, P., Hansen, E., Zhu, Z., and Stavisky, D. (1992). “Simulation of water supply and demand in the aral sea region.” Water International, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ridgley, M. A. (1993). “A multicriteria approach to allocation water during drought.” Resources and Optimization, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar
  16. Roy, B., Slowinski, R., and Treichel, W. (1992). “Multicriteria programming of water supply systems for rural areas.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
  17. Stockholm Environment Institute-Boston Center. (2001). K-WEAP User guide, SEI-US.Google Scholar
  18. Tecle, A., Fogel, M., and Duckstein, L. (1988). “Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 114, No. 14, pp. 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thiessen, E. M. and Loucks, D. P. (1992). “Computer assisted negotiation of multiobjective water resources conflicts.” Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 163–177.Google Scholar
  20. Yasin, A. -Z., Muhammad, S., Kdeb, A. -J., and Atef, A. -K. (2002). “Application of decision support system for sustainable management of water resources in Azaq Basin-Jordan.” Water International, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 532–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Specialist, Water Resources Research DepartmentKorea Institute of Construction TechnologyGoyangKorea
  2. 2.School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Water Resources Research DepartmentKorea Institute of Construction TechnologyGoyangKorea

Personalised recommendations