KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 595–606 | Cite as

Development of a large basin rainfall-runoff modeling system using the object-oriented hydrologic modeling system (OHyMoS)

  • Giha Lee
  • Sunmin Kim
  • Kwansue Jung
  • Yasuto Tachikawa
Article

Abstract

Development of basin-scale rainfall-runoff modeling systems is essential for integrated water resources management in terms of both assessing management alternatives and real-time resource management. This study developed a distributed rainfall-runoff modeling system based on the Object-oriented Hydrologic Modeling System (OHyMoS) for a large river basin (the Daechung Dam basin, South Korea; 3,994 km2) that is highly regulated by multipurpose dams. We applied three hydrologic element modules to simulate hillslope runoff, channel runoff, and dam reservoir outflow and then linked these modules together under OHyMoS to simultaneously predict discharges at eight specific outlets. This newly developed rainfall-runoff modeling system generally provided acceptable hydrographs during the typical Korean rainy period from 1 June to 30 September, although the simulated hydrographs for extreme flood events during typhoons and local heavy rainfall were underestimated compared to measured hydrographs. The developed modeling system can be used for water resources planning and management in the Daechung Dam basin and also readily extended to other large basins, such as the whole Geum River basin (9,835 km2) that includes the Daechung Dam basin, by incorporating sub-basin models into the system.

Keywords

basin scale hydrologic element modules OHyMoS rainfall-runoff modeling regulated basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (2002). “Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development.” Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthel, R., Nickel, D., Meleg, A., Trifkovic, A., and Braun, J. (2005). “Linking the physical and the socio-economic compartments of an integrated water and land use management model on a river basin scale using an object-oriented water supply model.” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Vol. 30, Nos. 6–7, pp. 389–397.Google Scholar
  3. Brath, A., Montanari, A., and Toth, E. (2004). “Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 291, Nos. 3–4, pp. 232–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter, T. M. and Georgakakos K. P. (2006). “Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologic model ensemble simulations on operational forecast scales.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 329, No. 30, pp. 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1992). “Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resources Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1015–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., and Gupta, V. K. (1994). “Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 158, Nos. 3–4, pp. 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eckhardt, K. and Arnold, J. G. (2001). “Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 251, Nos. 1–2, pp. 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ichikawa, Y., Hirano, K., Shiiba, M., Tachikawa, Y., and Takara, K. (1999). “Development of a dam model based on structural modeling system.” Proc. of the 54th Annual Conference of JSCE, Hiroshima, Japan, pp. 592–593 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  9. Ichikawa, Y., Shiiba, M., Tachikawa, Y., and Takara, K. (2000). “Objectoriented hydrological modeling system.” Proc. of 4th International Conference Hydroinformatics 2000, Iowa, USA, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, S., Tachikawa, Y., Nakakita, E., and Takara, K. (2009). “Climate change impact on water resources management in the Tone River Basin, Japan.” Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 52B, pp. 587–606.Google Scholar
  11. Leavesley, G. H., Markstrom, S. L., Brewer, M. S., and Viger, R. J. (1996). “The modular modeling system (MMS) — The physical process modeling component of a database-centered decision support system for water and power management.” Water Air and Soil Pollution, Vol. 90, Nos. 1–2, pp. 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leavesley, G. H., Markstrom, S. L., Restrepo, P. J., and Viger, R. J. (2002). “A modular approach to addressing model design, scale and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modeling.” Hydrological Processes, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, G., Tachikawa, Y., and Takara, K. (2009). “Interaction between topographic and process parameters due to the spatial resolution of DEMs in distributed rainfall-runoff modeling.” Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, Nol. 14, No. 10, pp. 1059–1069.Google Scholar
  14. Marino, M. A. and Simonovic, S. P. (2001). Integrated water resources management, IAHS Pub. No. 272, IAHS.Google Scholar
  15. Reed, M., Cuddy, S. M., and Rizzoli, A. E. (1999). “A framework for modeling multiple resource management issues — An open modeling approach.” Environmental Modeling and Software, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 503–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reed, S., Koren, V. I., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., Moreda, F., Seo, D.-J., and DMIP Participants (2004). “Overall distributed model intercomparison project results.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 298, No. 1, pp. 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reggiani, P. and Schellekens, J. (2005). “Rainfall-runoff modeling: Distributed models in encyclopedia of hydrological sciences.” Andersonm, M. G. and McDonnell, J. J. (Ed.), John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, Vol. 3, pp. 1967–1983.Google Scholar
  18. Sayama, T., Tachikawa, Y., Takara, K., and Ichikawa, Y. (2006). “Development of a real-time distributed flood prediction system in a flow regulated river basin.” Proc. of the 3rd APHW Conference 2006, Bangkok, Thailand, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  19. Senarath, S., Ogden, F. L., Downer, C. W., and Sharif, H. O. (2000). “On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models.” Water Resources Research, Vo. 36, No. 6, pp. 1495–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shiiba, M., Ichikawa, Y., Ikebuchi, S., Tachikawa, Y., and Takasao, T. (1996). “Scale-up of a runoff model using GIS and an object-oriented hydrological modeling system.” In HydroGIS’ 96, IAHS Publ. 235, Kovar, K. and Nachtnebel, H. P. (Eds.), IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp. 63–70.Google Scholar
  21. Shrestha, R., Tachikawa, Y. and Takara, K. (2006). “Input data resolution analysis for distributed hydrological modeling.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 319, Nos. 1–4, pp. 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh, V. P. and Frevert D. K. (2002). Mathematical models of large watershed hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, M. B., Seo, D. J., Koren, V. I., Reed, S. M., Zhang, Z., Duan, Q., Moreda, F., and Cong, S. (2004). “The Distributed Model Intercomparison Project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 298, No. 1, pp.4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sydelko, P. J., Hlohowskyj, I., Majerus, K., Christiansen, J. H., and Dolph, J. (2001). “An object-oriented framework for dynamic ecosystem modeling: Applications for integrated risk assessment.” The Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 274, Nos. 1–3, pp. 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tachikawa, Y., Ichikawa, Y., Takara, K., and Shiiba, M. (2000). “Development of a macro scale distributed hydrological model using an object-oriented hydrological modeling system.” Proc. of 4th International Conference Hydroinformatics 2000, Iowa, USA, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  26. Tachikawa, Y., Nagatani, G., and Takara, K. (2004). “Development of stage-discharge relationship equation incorporating saturated-unsaturated flow mechanism.” Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, No. 48, pp. 7–12 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  27. Takasao, T. and Shiiba, M. (1988). “Incorporation of the effect of concentration of flow into the kinematic wave equations and its applications to runoff system lumping.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 102, Nos. 1–4, pp. 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Takasao, T., Shiiba, M., and Ichikawa, Y. (1996). “A runoff simulation with structural hydrological modeling system.” Journal of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 47–55.Google Scholar
  29. Vieux, B. E. (2004). Distributed hydrological modeling using GIS, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  30. Whelan, G., Castleton, K. J., Buck, J. W., Hoopes, B. L., Pelton, M. A., Strenge, D. L., Gelston, G. M., and Kickert, R. N. (1997). Concepts of a framework for risk analysis in multimedia environmental systems, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: PNNL-11748.Google Scholar
  31. Zhao, R. J. (1992). “The Xinanjiang model applied in China.” Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 135, Nos. 1–4, pp. 371–381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giha Lee
    • 1
  • Sunmin Kim
    • 2
  • Kwansue Jung
    • 3
  • Yasuto Tachikawa
    • 4
  1. 1.Research Associate, Construction & Disaster Research Center, Dept. of Civil EngineeringChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Urban and Environmental EngineeringKyoto UniversityUji, KyotoJapan
  3. 3.Dept. of Civil EngineeringChungnam National UniversityDaejeonKorea
  4. 4.Dept. of Urban and Environmental EngineeringKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations