Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 897–904 | Cite as

Scaling effect for the quantification of soil loss using GIS spatial analysis

  • Geun Sang LeeEmail author
  • In Ho Choi
Article

Abstract

Accurate estimation of soil loss/deposition forced by rainfall events plays a major role in water resources management, which directly affects the quality of agricultural land and water storage capacity in reservoirs. In this paper, the soil loss model, Geographic Information System (GIS) based Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) was used to quantify soil loss in a small basin located in the southern part of Korea. The surface characteristics, such as soil texture, elevation and vegetation type, are needed to run the USLE model. Geospatial data has been successfully used to derive suitable model factors for this purpose. However, it is difficult to select the grid size of elements for the best fit, which is often decided in a subjective and intuitive way. A GIS spatial analysis was performed to investigate the scaling effect to estimate the soil loss in the USLE model using remotely sensed geospatial data. The results showed that the slope length factor (L) and slope steepness factor (S) were sensitive to the grid size; the optimal resolution for quantifying soil loss in the USLE model for the study site was 125 m. This approach presents a method for the selection of a suitable scale for estimating soil loss using remotely sensed geospatial data, which eventually improves the prediction of soil loss on a basin scale.

Keywords

Geographic Information System scaling effect resolution soil loss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bahadur K. C. K. (2009). “Mapping soil erosion susceptibility using remote sensing and GIS: A case of the upper Nam Wa Watershed, Nan Province, Thailand.” Environmental Geology, Vol. 57, No.3, pp. 695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartsch, P. (1998). Modelling soil loss to determine water erosion risk at Camp Williams national guard base, PhD Dissertation, UTAH State University.Google Scholar
  3. Dabral, P. P., Baithuri, N., and Pandey, A. (2008). “Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of north eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing.” Water Resources Management, Vol. 22, No.12, pp. 1783–1798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dissmeyer, G. E. and Foster, G. R. (1981). “Estimating the cover management factor in the USLE for forest conditions.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 36, No.4, pp. 235–240.Google Scholar
  5. El-Swaify, S. A. and Dangler, E. W. (1976). “Erodibilities of selected tropical soils in relation to structural and hydrologic parameters.” Soil Erosion Prediction and Control, In: Foster, G. R. (ed.), Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, USA, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar
  6. Erickson, A. J. (1997). Aids for estimating soil erodibility — K value class and soil loss tolerance, USDA Soil Conservation Service, Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandez, C., Wu, J. Q., McCool, D. K., and Stockle, C. O. (2003). “Estimating water erosion and sediment yield with GIS, RUSLE, and SEDD.” Journal of Soil Water Conservation, Vol. 58, pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
  8. Garde, R. J. and Kathyari, U. C. (1990). “Erosion prediction models for large catchments.” In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Water Erosion, Sedimentation, and Resource Conservation. Dehradun, India, pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
  9. Gilley, J. E., Finkner, S. C., Spomer, R. G., and Mielke, L. N. (1986). “Runoff and erosion as affected by crop.” Transactions of the American Association of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 29, No.1, pp. 157–160.Google Scholar
  10. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (KICT). (1992). The development of selection standard for calculation method of unit sediment yield in river, KICT 89-WR-113 Research Paper (In Korean).Google Scholar
  11. Latifovic, R., Zhu, Z. L., Cihlar, J., Giri, C., and Olthof, I. (2004). “Land cover mapping of North and Central America-Global Land Cover 2000.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 89, No.1, pp. 116–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Martin D. and Saha S. K. (2007). “Runoff and sediment yield modeling from a small agricultural watershed in India using the WEPP model.” PHOTONIRVACHAK-Journal of the Indian society of Remote Sensing, Vol. 35, No.1, pp. 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCool, D. K., Foster, G. R., Mutchler, C. K., and Meyer, L. D. (1989). “Revised slope length factor the universal soil loss equation.” Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Vol. 32, No.5, pp. 1571–1576.Google Scholar
  14. Nearing, M. A. (1997). “A single continuous function for slope steepness influence on soil loss.” Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 61, pp. 917–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ouyang, D. (2001). Modeling sediment and phosphorus loading in a small agricultural watershed, PhD Dissertation, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  16. Renard, K. G. and Foster, G.. R. (1983). “Soil conservation-principles of erosion by water.” Dryland Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, In: Dregne, H. E., Willies, W. O. (eds.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WO, USA, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
  17. Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D. K., and Yoder, D. C. (1998). Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Agriculture, Handbook No. 703, usda, ARS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  18. Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., and Porter, P.J. (1991). “RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 46, No.1, pp. 30–33.Google Scholar
  19. Sharma, T., Satya Kiran, P. V., Singh, T. P., Trivedi, A. V., and Navalgund, R. R. (2001). “Hydrologic response of a watershed to land use changes: A remote sensing and GIS approach.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 22, No.11, pp. 2095–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi, W. Z., Li, Q. Q., and Zhu, C. Q. (2005). “Estimating the propagation error of DEM from higher-order interpolation algorithm.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 26, No.14, pp. 3069–3084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singh, A. (1986). “Change detection in the tropical forest environment of northeastern India using LANDSAT.” Remote Sensing and Tropical Land Management, Plymouth, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., pp. 237–254.Google Scholar
  22. Terrence J., George R., and Kenneth G. (2002). Soil erosion, ISBN 0-471-38369-4, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., pp. 75–119.Google Scholar
  23. Wang, F. and Hall, G. B. (1996). “Fuzzy representation of geographical boundaries in GIS.” International Journal of Geographic Information System, Vol. 10, No.5, pp. 573–590.Google Scholar
  24. Wischmeier, W. H. (1971). “A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 26, pp. 189–193.Google Scholar
  25. Wischmeier, W. H. and Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses — A guide to conservation planning, USDA-Agriculture Handbook No. 537. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Yitayew, M., Pokrzywka, S. J., and Renard, K.G. (1999). “Using GIS for facilitating erosion estimation.” Appl. Eng. Agric., Vo. 15, No.4, pp. 295–301.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Civil Engineers and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Cadastre and Real EstateVision University of JeonjuJeonjuKorea
  2. 2.Dept. of Real EstateNamseoul UniversityCheonanKorea

Personalised recommendations