Advertisement

Pressure-Based Approach to Estimating the Injection Start and End in Single and Split Common Rail Injection Processes

  • Jiaqi Zhai (翟佳琦)
  • Yaozong Duan (段耀宗)
  • Dong Han (韩东)
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Fuel injection timing is an important control parameter for engine combustion optimization and emissions control. However, the actual fuel injection timing is different from the nominal one commanded by the electronic control unit, due to the system hydraulic lag or the possible communication malfunction. In this study, a simple estimate approach based on the injector inlet pressure is proposed to capture four critical characteristic instants at the start and end of injection. The critical characteristic moments estimated using this pressure-based approach are validated against those determined by the actual injection rate profiles, in the context of different single or split injection processes. The comparison revealed that the characteristic injection moments estimated by the injector inlet pressures and those determined by the actual injection rate profiles have a satisfactory agreement, certifying the broad applicability and reliability of this pressure-based approach in the detection of the real fuel injection start and end time.

Key words

injector inlet pressure common rail injection system injection diagnostics single injection split injection 

CLC number

TK 428 

Document code

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    MOHAN B, YANG W M, CHOU S K. Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—A review [J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 28: 664–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    LI T, MORIWAKI R, OGAWA H, et al. Dependence of premixed low-temperature diesel combustion on fuel ignitability and volatility [J]. International Journal of Engine Research, 2012, 13(1): 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    HAN D, ICKES A M, BOHAC S V, et al. HC and CO emissions of premixed low-temperature combustion fueled by blends of diesel and gasoline [J]. Fuel, 2012, 99: 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    JING W, WU Z Y, ROBERTS W L, et al. Spray combustion of biomass-based renewable diesel fuel using multiple injection strategy in a constant volume combustion chamber [J]. Fuel, 2016, 181: 718–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    YANAI T, AVERSA C, DEV S, et al. Investigation of fuel injection strategies for direct injection of neat n-butanol in a compression ignition engine [J]. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, 9(3): 1512–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    CATANIA A E, FERRARI A, MANNO M. Development and application of a complete common-rail injection system mathematical model for hydrodynamic analysis and diagnostics [C]//ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Spring Technical Conference. Chicago, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    PLAMONDON E, SEERS P. Development of a simplified dynamic model for a piezoelectric injector using multiple injection strategies with biodiesel/diesel-fuel blends [J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 131: 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    PAYRI R, SALVADOR F J, MARTÍ-ALDARAVÍ P, et al. Using one-dimensional modeling to analyse the influence of the use of biodiesels on the dynamic behavior of solenoid-operated injectors in common rail systems: Detailed injection system model [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2012, 54(1): 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D’AMBROSIO S, FERRARI A. Effects of pilot injection parameters on low temperature combustion diesel engines equipped with solenoid injectors featuring conventional and rate-shaped main injection [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2016, 110: 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D’AMBROSIO S, FERRARI A. Effects of exhaust gas recirculation in diesel engines featuring late PCCI type combustion strategies [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2015, 105(2): 1269–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    BUSCH S, ZHA K, WAREY A, et al. On the reduction of combustion noise by a close-coupled pilot injection in a small-bore direct-injection diesel engine [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2016, 138(10): 102804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    LI T, SUZUKI M, OGAWA H. Effect of two-stage injection on unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions in smokeless low-temperature diesel combustion with ultra-high exhaust gas recirculation [J]. International Journal of Engine Research, 2010, 11(5): 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    REHMAN S. Sensors based measurement techniques of fuel injection and ignition characteristics of diesel sprays in DI combustion system [J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016, 55(3): 2391–2402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    SEQUERA A J, PARTHASARATHY R N, GOLLAHALLI S R. Effect of fuel injection timing in the combustion of biofuels in a diesel engine [C]//International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference. Denver, USA: AIAA, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    MARCHI A, NOURI J, YAN Y, et al. Spray stability of outwards opening pintle injectors for stratified direct injection spark ignition engine operation [J]. International Journal of Engine Research, 2010, 11(6): 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    HAN D, DUAN Y Z, WANG C H, et al. Experimental study on injection characteristics of fatty acid esters on a diesel engine common rail system [J]. Fuel, 2014, 123: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    HAN D, WANG C H, DUAN Y Z, et al. An experimental study of injection and spray characteristics of diesel and gasoline blends on a common rail injection system [J]. Energy, 2014, 75: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    CATANIA A E, FERRARI A, MANNO M, et al. Experimental investigation of dynamics effects on multiple-injection common rail system performance [J]. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2008, 130(3): 032806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    HAN D, DUAN Y Z, WANG C H, et al. Experimental study of the two-stage injection process of fatty acid esters on a common rail injection system [J]. Fuel, 2016, 163: 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    HAN D, LI K, DUAN Y Z, et al. Numerical study on fuel physical effects on the split injection processes on a common rail injection system [J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 134: 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiaotong University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiaqi Zhai (翟佳琦)
    • 1
  • Yaozong Duan (段耀宗)
    • 1
  • Dong Han (韩东)
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Power Machinery and Engineering of Ministry of EducationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations