Structural Optimization of Hatch Cover Based on Bi-directional Evolutionary Structure Optimization and Surrogate Model Method
- 14 Downloads
Weight reduction has attracted much attention among ship designers and ship owners. In the present work, based on an improved bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) method and surrogate model method, we propose a hybrid optimization method for the structural design optimization of beam-plate structures, which covers three optimization levels: dimension optimization, topology optimization and section optimization. The objective of the proposed optimization method is to minimize the weight of design object under a group of constraints. The kernel optimization procedure (KOP) uses BESO to obtain the optimal topology from a ground structure. To deal with beam-plate structures, the traditional BESO method is improved by using cubic box as the unit cell instead of solid unit to construct periodic lattice structure. In the first optimization level, a series of ground structures are generated based on different dimensional parameter combinations, the KOP is performed to all the ground structures, the response surface model of optimal objective values and dimension parameters is created, and then the optimal dimension parameters can be obtained. In the second optimization level, the optimal topology is obtained by using the KOP according to the optimal dimension parameters. In the third optimization level, response surface method (RSM) is used to determine the section parameters. The proposed method is applied to a hatch cover structure design. The locations and shapes of all the structural members are determined from an oversized ground structure. The results show that the proposed method leads to a greater weight saving, compared with the original design and genetic algorithm (GA) based optimization results.
Key wordshatch cover structure optimization multi-level optimization bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization response surface method
CLC numberU 663
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- YUAN Y, WANG D Y, LI Z. Optimization of ship structure based on support vector machine [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2013, 35(7): 12–17 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- JANG C D, NA S S. Development of optimum structural design system for double hull oil tankers [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 2000, 37(1): 118–126 (in Korean).Google Scholar
- YANG J M, HWANG C N. Optimization of corrugated bulkhead forms by genetic algorithm [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2002, 10(2): 146–153.Google Scholar
- REN H J, ZHANG Q Y, HU Y M, et al. Optimization of small waterplane area twin-hull ship structure based on parametric sub-model [J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43(11): 88–92 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- ANDRIć J, žANIć V, GRGIć M. Structural optimization of corrugated transverse bulkheads made of stainless steel [J]. Brodogradnja, 2010, 61(1): 18–27.Google Scholar
- QIU WQ, YANG DQ, GAO C, et al. Structural design in cargo tank region for oil tankers based on topology optimization [J]. Ship &Boat, 2016, 162(5): 1–11 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- AKPAN U O, KOKO T S, AYYUB B M, et al. Reliability-based optimal design of steel box structures. II: Ship structure applications [J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2015, 1(3): 1–8.Google Scholar
- SU Z J, XIAO R B, ZHONG Y F. An improved multidisciplinary feasible method using DACE approximation approach [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2005, 16(2): 335–340.Google Scholar
- MUHAMMAD S. Parameterized automated generic model for aircraft wing structural design and mesh generation for finite element analysis [D]. LinkÖping, Sweden: LinkÖping University, 2011.Google Scholar