A fuzzy fault diagnosis method for large radar based on directed graph model
- 87 Downloads
Abstract
To meet the requirement of the real-time, accuracy and multi-target diagnosis of the large radar system, a new fuzzy fault diagnosis method based on directed graph model is proposed in this paper. In this method, the large complex system model is defined using the directed graph model firstly, in which the nodes observing the fault by the hierarchical reconstruction of the directed graph are located, then the fault dependency matrix between these nodes and the fault sources are established. And then, we utilize the sensors’ alarm probabilities under different situations to build the characteristic fault observation matrix in the fault observation space. Finally, the optimized corresponding diagnosis method using a fuzzy function, which describes the similarity between the actual observation vector and the fault’s characteristic vector, is designed. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve high diagnosis efficiency and accuracy. It can be widely used in the real radar system.
Key words
fault diagnosis directed graph radar fuzzy functionCLC number
TP 3-0Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Zhang B Y, Li S H, Yan W. An efficient scheduling method for phased array radars with limited time resources [C]// Proceedings of the IET International Radar Conference. Guilin, China: Institution of Engineering and Technology. 2009: 1–4.Google Scholar
- [2]Mir H S, Wilkinson J D. Task scheduling algorithm for an air and missile defense radar [C]// Proceedings of the IEEE Radar Conference. Rome, Italy: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2008: 1–6.Google Scholar
- [3]Rao N S V. On parallel algorithms for single-fault diagnosis in fault propagation graph systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 1996, 7(12): 1217–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Kokawa M, Miyazaki S, Shingai S. Fault location using digraph and inverse direction search with application [J]. Automatica, 1983, 19(6): 729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Deb S, Parttipati K R, Reghavan V. Multi signal flow graphs: A novel approach for system testability analysis and fault diagnosis [J]. IEEE Aerospace and Electronics Magazine, 1995, 10(5): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Maurya M R, Rengaswamy R. A signed directed graph-based systematic framework for steady-state malfunction diagnosis inside control loops [J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(6): 1790–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Azam M S, Tu F, Pattipati K R. A dependency model-based approach for identifyling and evaluating power quality problems [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2004, 19(3): 1154–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Song Qi-jiang, Xu Min-qiang, Wang Ri-xin. Spacecraft fault diagnosis based on hierarchical digraphs [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(6): 1058–1062 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- [9]Wu Yu-bin, Zhang He-xin, Lü Yong-jia. Application of fault propagation digraph for ground power fault diagnosis [J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2012, 40(1):154–159 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- [10]Sehgal R, Gandhi O P, Angra V. Fault location of tribo-mechanical systems — A graph theory and matrix approach [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 70(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar