Toward the implementation of a universal angle-based optical indoor positioning system
There is an emerging market today for indoor positioning systems capable of working alongside global navigation satellite systems, such as the global positioning system, in indoor environments. Many systems have been proposed in the literature but all of them have fundamental flaws that hold them back from widescale implementation. We review angle-of-arrival (AOA) and angle-difference-of-arrival (ADOA) optical indoor positioning systems which have been proven to be robust, accurate, and easily implementable. We build an AOA/ADOA optical indoor positioning system out of a simple commercial high-speed camera and white light light emitting diodes (LEDs) which operate over a working area of 1 m3, and compare its performance to other indoor positioning methods. The AOA and ADOA systems achieve positioning with low errors of 1.2 and 3.7 cm, respectively.
Keywordsangle-of-arrival (AOA) angle-difference-of-arrival (ADOA) indoor positioning optical positioning
This work was supported in part by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and Western Economic Diversification Canada.
- 1.Leveson I. The economic value of GPS: preliminary assessment. Leveson Consulting. 2015, https://doi.org/www.gps.gov/governance/advisory/meetings/2015-06/leveson.pdf Google Scholar
- 2.Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard. 4 ed, 2008Google Scholar
- 6.Kim Y, Hwang J, Lee J, Yoo M. Position estimation algorithm based on tracking of received light intensity for indoor visible light communication systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Ubiquitous & Future Networks. Dalian, China: IEEE, 2011, 131–134Google Scholar
- 12.Rahaim M, Prince G B, Little T D C. State estimation and motion tracking for spatially diverse VLC networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps). Anaheim, CA, USA: IEEE, 2012, 1249–1253Google Scholar
- 24.Wu J, Zhu J, Yu Z, Zhuge J. Three-dimensional temperature field compensation technology for large-scale ultrasonic positioning system. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement & Control, 2016, 39(12): 0142331216648375Google Scholar
- 25.Zhao X, Xiao Z, Markham A, Trigoni N, Ren Y. Does BTLE measure up against WiFi? A comparison of indoor location performance. In: Proceedings of20th EuropeanWireless Conference on European Wireless. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2014, 1–6Google Scholar
- 26.Infsoft GmbH. Indoor Positioning, Tracking and Indoor Navigation with Wi-Fi. 2017, https://doi.org/www.infsoft.com/technology/sensors/wifi, accessed: 24-Jan-2018
- 31.Wu D, Ghassemlooy Z, Zhong W D, Khalighi M A, Minh H L, Chen C, Zvanovec S, Boucouvalas A C. Effect of optimal Lambertian order for cellular indoor optical wireless communication and positioning systems. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif.), 2016, 55(6): 066114Google Scholar
- 32.Li L, Hu P, Peng C, Shen G, Zhao F. Epsilon: a visible light based positioning system. In: Proceedings of 11th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Seattle,WA, USA: ACM, 2014, 331–343Google Scholar