Journal of Transportation Security

, Volume 10, Issue 1–2, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Risk and economic assessment of expedited passenger screening and TSA PreCheck

  • Mark G. StewartEmail author
  • John Mueller


The Transportation Security Administration’s PreCheck program allows airline passengers assessed as low risk to be directed to faster screening lanes. The paper assesses the scenario of a terrorist plot to down an airliner with a passenger-borne bomb. There are four main conclusions. First, we find that the layered system currently in place reduces the risk of such an attack by 98% - and probably by quite a bit more. Second, this level of risk reduction is very robust: security remains high even when the parameters that make it up are varied considerably. In particular, because of the large array of other security layers, overall risk reduction is relatively insensitive to how effective checkpoint screening is. Third, under most realistic combinations of parameter values PreCheck actually increases risk reduction, perhaps up to 1%, while under the worst assumptions, it lowers risk reduction by some 0.3%. Fourth, the co-benefits of the PreCheck program are very substantial: by greatly reducing checkpoint costs and by improving the passenger experience, this benefit can exceed several billion dollars per year. We also find that adding random exclusion and managed inclusion to the PreCheck program has little effect on the program’s risk reducing capability one way or the other. TSA PreCheck thus seems likely to bring efficiencies to the screening process and great benefits to passengers, airports, and airlines while actually enhancing security.


Aviation security Terrorism PreCheck Risk Cost-benefit analysis Passenger screening Airports 



This research was supported by the United States Department of Homeland Security through the National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) under Agreement No. 2010-ST-061-RE0001-06. However, any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect views of the United States Department of Homeland Security or the University of Southern California.


  1. Aaronson T (2013) The terror factory. Ig Publishing, BrooklynGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahms M (2006) Why terrorism does not work. Int Secur 31(2):42–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahms M (2011) Does terrorism really work? Evolution in the conventional wisdom since 9/11. Def Peace Econ 22(6):583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aratani, L. (2015), Change in TSA screening may mean longer waits at TSA checkpoints.The Washington PostGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum P (2016) Violence in the skies: a history of aircraft hijacking and bombing. Summersdale Publishers, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayles F (1996) Planes don’t blow up aviation experts assert. Int Herald TribuneGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckner C (2015) Risk-based security and the aviation system: operational objectives and policy challenges, issue brief # 2015–02. The George Washington University, U.S, Center for Cyber & Homeland SecurityGoogle Scholar
  8. Blalock G, Vrinda K, Simon DH (2007) The impact of post-9/11 airport security measures on the demand for air travel. J Law Econ 50(4):731–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BTS (2016) Operating revenue: all U.S. carriers - all regions, bureau of transportation statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Cha EJ, Ellingwood BR (2012) Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence hazards. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 104:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DHS (2016) Budget-in-brief fiscal year 2016. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Elias B (2009) Airport and aviation security: U.S. policy and strategy in the age of global terrorism. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher KC (2011) Aviation security: case for risk-based passenger screening. Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, California Scholar
  14. Fletcher KC (2015) Risk-based security: assessing the path forward for TSA Pre✓®, written testimony of TSA chief risk officer Ken Fletcher for a house committee on homeland security, subcommittee on transportation security hearing, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. GAO (2014) Aviation security: rapid growth in expedited passenger screening highlights need to plan effective security assessments, report number GAO-15-150, government accountability office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. GAO (2015) Aviation security, TSA's managed inclusion process expands passenger expedited screening, but TSA has not tested its security effectiveness, statement of Jennifer A. Grover, Director, homeland security and justice, testimony before the subcommittee on transportation security, committee on homeland security, house of representatives, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. GBTA (2016) Satisfaction significantly higher for business travelers enrolled in TSA PreCheck, global business travel association, news releaseGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillen D, Morrison WG (2015) Aviation security: costing, pricing, finance and performance. J Air Transp Manag 48:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gkritza K, Niemeier D, Mannering F (2006) Airport security screening and changing passenger satisfaction: an exploratory assessment. J Air Transp Manag 12(5):213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Global Terrorism Database (2016) National consortium for the study of terrorism and responses to terrorism (START), University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  21. Grant M, Stewart MG (2012) A systems model for probabilistic risk assessment of improvised explosive device attack. Int J Intel Defence Support Syst 5(1):75–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant M, Stewart MG (2015) Probabilistic risk assessment for improvised explosive device attacks causing significant building damage. J Perform Constr Facil 29(5):B4014009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawley K, Means N (2012) Permanent emergency: inside the TSA and the fight for the future of American security. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Holguin-Veras J, Xu N, Bhat C (2012) An assessment of the impacts of inspection times on the airline Industry’s market share after September 11th. J Air Trans Manag 23(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IATA (2013) Joint press release: ACI and IATA collaborate to deliver smart security, international air transport association, press release no. 70,Google Scholar
  26. Jackson BA, LaTourette T (2015) Assessing the effectiveness of layered security for protecting the aviation system against adaptive adversaries. J Air Trans Manag 35:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson BA, Chan EW, LaTourrette T (2012a) Assessing the security benefits of a trusted traveler program in the presence of attempted attacker exploitation and compromise. J Trans Secur 5:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson BA, LaTourrette T, Chan EW, Lundberg R, Morral AR, Frelinger DR (2012b) Efficient aviation security. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobson SH, Karnani T, Kobza JE, Ritchie L (2006) A cost-benefit analysis of alternative device configurations for aviation checked baggage security screening. Risk Anal 26(2):297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenney M (2010) ‘Dumb’ yet deadly: local knowledge and poor tradecraft among Islamist militants in Britain and Spain. Stud Conflict Terrorism 31:1–22Google Scholar
  31. Kriel, R. and Cruickshank, P. (2016) Source: 'Sophisticated' laptop bomb on Somali plane got through X-ray machine, CNN Google Scholar
  32. Landau S, Weisbrod G, Gosling G, Williges C, Pumphrey M, Fowler M (2015) Passenger value of time, benefit-cost analysis, and airport capital investment decisions, volume 1: guidebook for valuing user time savings in airport capital investment decision analysis, contractors guidebook for ARCP 03–19, transportation research board of the national academiesGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee AJ, Jacobson SH (2011) The impact of aviation checkpoint queues on optimizing security screening effectiveness. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(8):900–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martonosi SE, Barnett A (2006) How effective is security screening of airline passengers? Interfaces 36(6):545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathew JK, Hubbard SM and Bullock DM (2016) Impact of security reconfiguration and expedited security at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky airport on reducing passenger wait time, Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  36. McLay LA, Lee AJ, Jacobson SH (2010) Risk-based policies for airport security checkpoint screening. Transp Sci 44(3):333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morral AR, Price CC, Oritz DS, Wilson B, LaTourrette T, Mobley BW, McKay S, Willis HH (2012) Modeling terrorism risk to the air transportation system. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  38. Mueller J (2016) Terrorism since 9/11: the American cases. Accessed 20 May 2016
  39. Mueller J, Stewart MG (2011) Terror, security, and money: balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mueller J, Stewart MG (2012) The terrorism delusion: America’s overwrought response to September 11. Int Secur 37(1):81–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mueller J, Stewart MG (2014) Evaluating counterterrorism spending. J Econ Perspect 28(3):237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mueller J, Stewart MG (2016a) Chasing ghosts: the policing of terrorism. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Mueller J, Stewart MG (2016b) Conflating terrorism and insurgency, lawfare.comGoogle Scholar
  44. Mullainathan, S. and Thaler, R.H. (2016) Waiting in line for the illusion of security. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  45. OMB (1992) Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs (revised), Circular No. A-94, October 29, 1992. Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Poole, R.W. (2008) Towards risk-based aviation security policy, discussion paper no. 2008-23, OECD/ITF round table on security, risk perception and cost-benefit analysis, international transport forum, 11-12Google Scholar
  47. Poole RW (2015) Fresh thinking on aviation security. J Air Trans Manag 48:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Price JC, Forrest JS (2013) Practical aviation security: predicting and preventing future threats. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  49. Reuters (2015) US airport screenings fail to detect mock weapons in 95% of tests, The Guardian, 3Google Scholar
  50. Sewell EC, Lee AJ, Jacobson SH (2013) Optimal allocation of aviation security screening devices. J Transp Secur 6:103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart MG, Melchers RE (1997) Probabilistic risk assessment of engineering systems. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2008) A risk and cost-benefit assessment of U.S. Aviation Security Measures, J Trans Secur, 1(3):143–159.Google Scholar
  53. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2011) Cost-benefit analysis of advanced imaging technology fully body scanners for airline passenger security screening. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 8(1):Article 30Google Scholar
  54. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2013a) Terrorism risks and cost-benefit analysis of aviation security. Risk Anal 33(5):893–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2013b) Aviation security, risk assessment, and risk aversion for public decisionmaking. J Policy Anal Manage 32(3):615–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2014a) Risk and cost-benefit analysis of police counter-terrorism operations at Australian airports. J Policing Intell Counter Terrorism 9(2):98–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2014b) Cost-benefit analysis of airport security: are airports too safe? J Air Trans Manag 35:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2015) Responsible policy analysis in aviation security with an evaluation of PreCheck. J Air Trans Manag 48(September):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stewart MG, Mueller J (2016) Risk-based passenger screening: risk and economic assessment of TSA PreCheck, increased security at reduced cost?, Research report no. 283.06.2016, Centre for Infrastructure Performance and Reliability, the University of NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  60. Stewart MG, Ellingwood BR, Mueller J (2011) Homeland security: a case study in risk aversion for public decision-making. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 15(5/6):367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stone CA, Zissu A (2007) Registered traveler program: the financial value of registering the good guys. Rev Policy Res 24(5):443–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sunstein CR (2002) The cost-benefit state: the future of regulatory protection. ABA Publishing, American Bar Association, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Treverton GF, Adams JL, Dertouzous J, Dutt A, Everingham SF, Larson EV (2008) The costs of responding to the terrorist threats. In: Keefer P, Loayza N (eds) Terrorism, economic development, and political openness. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. TSA (2014) Written testimony of TSA administrator John Pistole for a senate committee on commerce, science, and transportation hearing titled “TSA oversight: confronting America's transportation security challenges”Google Scholar
  65. TSA (2016) TSA releases 2015 statistics, national press release. Transportation Security Administration, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  66. von Winterfeldt D, O’Sullivan TM (2006) Should We protect commercial airplanes against surface-to-air missile attacks by terrorists? Decis Anal 3(2):63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walsh B (2009) Why it’s not easy to detonate a bomb on board. TimeGoogle Scholar
  68. Willis HH, LaTourette T (2008) Using probabilistic terrorism risk-modeling for regulatory benefit-cost analysis: application to the western hemisphere travel initiative in the land environment. Risk Anal 28:325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wong S, Brooks N (2015) Evolving risk-based security: a review of current issues and emerging trends impacting security screening in the aviation industry. J Air Trans Manag 48:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Infrastructure Performance and ReliabilityThe University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  2. 2.Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Department of Political ScienceOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Cato InstituteWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations